AUFAMILY Forums: SEC Football:Economy Of A Win - AUFAMILY Forums

Jump to content



Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic
  • Bookmark

SEC Football:Economy Of A Win Saturday Down South

#1 User is offline   BZ770 

  • ALUM 2000
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members-Media Access
  • Posts: 2,567
  • Joined: 24-September 03

Posted 09 February 2012 - 02:39 PM

http://www.saturdayd...ll-economy-win/

Quote

Editors’ Note: This is a guest post written by Aaron Caldwell of So Fried Sports, a site created to give SEC fans the most relevant, up-to-date football, basketball and baseball coverage. From written content to a daily online video show with expert analysis, So Fried Sports has everything you need to stay informed. Want a laugh or two? Check out their ‘So Crazy’ page.

Given the current climate in this country regarding how much money is paid to our elected officials, big company moguls and Nicholas Cage for being in horrible movie, after horrible movie with no end in sight – IT’S THE END TIMES EVERYONE! NOOOO NOT THE BEES!! (“Wickerman Bees”…You Tube it now, thank me later), I took a gander at the athletic budgets of all SEC schools. Specifically, I examined the football budgets for the 2010-2011 season of the public SEC schools (these are the latest records released from the NCAA on SEC athletic budgets). My focus is primarily on the amount each school spends on their football program and approximately how much bang for their buck they got in terms of SEC conference wins from this past football season.

Technically, Ole Miss wins the battle of wins per dollar spent as they won precisely zero conference games. Thus, their $17,764,174.00 of football expenses equals $0.00 of dollars spent per win (Glass half full!). As for the schools that won conference games this past year, the highest dollar amount per win for 2011 belongs to the Volunteers of Tennessee. The University of Tennessee’s football expenses for 2010-2011 totaled $19,135,650.00. Given the Vols 1-7 conference record for this past year, it obviously follows that they paid $19,135,650.00 per win.

The most “economical” football team in the SEC for 2011, with football expenses of $21,492,741 (Seventh in the SEC), is Louisiana State University. Yup, one of the top teams in the country in the top college football conference in America is in the bottom half of the SEC in terms of football expenses. With their 8-0 record in the SEC, they paid approximately $2,686,592.63 per win. That’s $461,455.66 less than the second place University of Georgia (7-1) who paid $3,148,048.29 per win out of their operating expenses of $22,036,338.00.

How about the BCS National Champion Alabama Crimson Tide? They check in at almost two million dollars more per win than their championship game foe, LSU. The cash register for the University of Alabama (7-1) rings a total of $31,580,059.00 spent on football in 2010-2011, which would equate to $4,511,437.00 per win in 2011.

The highest budget for football expenses for the 2010-2011 season was Auburn University at $39,069,676.00. Coming in at 4-4 in SEC play last year would place them behind Tennessee at $9,767,419.00 per win.

Money builds excellent weight rooms, adds seating in already mega stadiums and does increase the chances of finding BCS bliss. However, when looking at the budgets for football in the SEC (Western Division champ and BCS Championship player LSU coming in seventh in football expenses, Eastern Division Champ Georgia at sixth, and previous two time champion Florida going 3-5 despite having the third highest amount spent on football in the SEC) winning the spending game money doesn’t always equal winning more games.




9 Million for an SEC win and well worth it.

#2 User is offline   hqsi99 

  • Trainer
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members-Media Access
  • Posts: 153
  • Joined: 18-October 10

Posted 20 February 2012 - 09:27 AM

Someone should probably tell this guy that dividing by zero does not get you zero. Division by zero is either treated as undefined or infinite. Neither of which bodes well for Ole Miss.

#3 User is offline   quietfan 

  • BOT Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members-Media Access
  • Posts: 7,115
  • Joined: 02-October 03

Posted 20 February 2012 - 10:47 AM

View Posthqsi99, on 20 February 2012 - 09:27 AM, said:

Someone should probably tell this guy that dividing by zero does not get you zero. Division by zero is either treated as undefined or infinite. Neither of which bodes well for Ole Miss.

Yep, he lost me there too. ...not sure he knows what he means anyway:

Quote

Technically, Ole Miss wins the battle of wins per dollar spent as they won precisely zero conference games. Thus, their $17,764,174.00 of football expenses equals $0.00 of dollars spent per win (Glass half full!).

"Dollars per win" means dividing by zero, "wins per dollar" is indeed zero.

#4 User is offline   AUtiger98 

  • Street Agent
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members-Media Access
  • Posts: 475
  • Joined: 14-September 09

Posted 20 February 2012 - 12:44 PM

I would guess a nice chunk of our budget was used to promote the National Championship. New signs, news marketing material, coaches incentives reached in 2011. If so WELL WORTH EVERY PENNY!!!!

#5 User is offline   bdc81 

  • Asst Coach
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members-Media Access
  • Posts: 268
  • Joined: 01-December 07

Posted 20 February 2012 - 02:50 PM

This is a non profit venture, I don't care about how much per game.
If we pay all of our bills, achieve our goals and, some left over for the university and future development, and have a clean bill of health from the NCAA then it was a successful year.
I'm certain the cost per win was a lot more in 1981 than 1983, but it paid dividends!


Little doc

#6 User is offline   cptau 

  • Professor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members-Media Access
  • Posts: 926
  • Joined: 17-July 09

Posted 20 February 2012 - 04:37 PM

It costs as much to win a game as to lose a game. His math does not work. You could total the team's football costs for the year and divide by 12. Then multiple the per game expense by number of wins and the per game expense by loss. Thus Ole Miss paid a ton of money to lose a lot of games and a lot less cash to win a few games........


For Bama, paying the Sabear's salary puts their expenses way up per game. And they were still paying for 2 head coaches last year. Mike Shula's contract ran to the end of 2011.
I doubt they sent Shula a BCS ring and he probably would not want it.

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic
  • Bookmark



1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users