AUFAMILY Forums: Tougher NCAA sanctions? - AUFAMILY Forums

Jump to content



Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic
  • Bookmark

Tougher NCAA sanctions?

#1 User is offline   quietfan 

  • BOT Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members-Media Access
  • Posts: 7,115
  • Joined: 02-October 03

Posted 12 February 2012 - 02:21 PM

Of course, passing tougher sanctions and actually applying/enforcing them are two different things:

http://www.al.com/sp...new_severe.html

Quote

NCAA panel proposes new severe penalties for violations

The panel formed by the NCAA to propose stiffer penalties for major rules violations has suggested punishments that would get the immediate attention of all universities.

USA Today obtained the proposals that for the worst offenders include postseason bans of three or more years, fines that could reach $1 million or more, season-long suspensions for coaches and 10-year show-cause penalties for coaches and administrators.

The plan has been delivered to the NCAA membership -- that is, schools and conferences -- for feedback. Then, the plan will go to the Division I board of directors in late April. If approved, the penalties would go into effect in August.

"In terms of 'What's going to be the impact here,' it should be significant," Julie Roe Lach, the NCAA's vice president of enforcement, told USA Today. "I think they (the changes) will get people's attention."

The group pulling together the plan is chaired by Oregon State president Ed Ray. NCAA president Mark Emmert has promised a more nimble and effective organization--and one that more severely punishes rule breakers.

Ray's panel laid out proposed sanctions aimed at hitting hard those who commit academic fraud, willfully provide illicit benefits for athletes and for programs found guilty of a lack of institutional control.

The proposed penalties, according to documentation obtained by USA Today, include:

• A postseason ban of three or more years in severe cases or standard length of one or two years.

• A fine of up to 5 percent of a program's budget. The standard would be 1-3 percent, the paper reports.

• A loss of up to half of a team's scholarships, while the standard would be 12-1/2 percent to 25 percent.

• Season-long coach suspensions. The standard would be 20-50 percent.

• Up to 10 years in which a coach or administrator would have a show-cause penalty attached to his record, far more than the standard two to five years.

• Probationary periods of as many as six to 10 years, above the standard two to six years.


Nevertheless, I can think of one or two programs (Don't think I need to name them. :rolleyes: ) that I would still like to see take a forced 1-2 year hiatus and return irrelevant to college football for years to come, a la SMU!

#2 User is offline   TalisiTiger'sAcolyte 

  • AU Fan
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 11
  • Joined: 04-February 12

Posted 12 February 2012 - 02:47 PM

Too bad none of that will apply to Emmert's 'boy' in West Vance.

#3 User is offline   Tigermike 

  • BOT Chairman
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 31,441
  • Joined: 22-September 03

Posted 12 February 2012 - 03:14 PM

View PostTalisiTiger, on 12 February 2012 - 02:47 PM, said:

Too bad none of that will apply to Emmert's 'boy' in West Vance.


Or to the school in Columbus, Ohio.

Or the school in Los Angeles, California.
Posted ImagePosted ImagePosted Image

#4 User is offline   CJ Bas 

  • Rogue Booster
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members-Media Access
  • Posts: 753
  • Joined: 09-June 11

Posted 12 February 2012 - 05:58 PM

If they start imposing those kind of sanctions on most teams but ignore the worst offenders, like bama, then the majority could get extremely po'ed (finally)at the NCAA's playing favorites.

#5 User is offline   Tigermike 

  • BOT Chairman
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 31,441
  • Joined: 22-September 03

Posted 12 February 2012 - 06:28 PM

View PostCJ Bas, on 12 February 2012 - 05:58 PM, said:

If they start imposing those kind of sanctions on most teams but ignore the worst offenders, like bama, then the majority could get extremely po'ed (finally)at the NCAA's playing favorites.


Not everyone has gotten as good as Bammer at hiding their shenanigans.
Posted ImagePosted ImagePosted Image

#6 User is offline   cptau 

  • Professor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members-Media Access
  • Posts: 926
  • Joined: 17-July 09

Posted 12 February 2012 - 07:48 PM

The NCAA must be very unhappy at how fast some programs seem to recover from major probation and sanctions. USCw seems ready to be back as a top ten program. OSU maybe better off now with a coaching change.

Which brings up the question as to why it took UAT 8 years to recover. Self imposed sanctions from constantly making the wrong choices?

#7 User is offline   WarTiger 

  • BOT Chairman
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 15,809
  • Joined: 21-September 03

Posted 12 February 2012 - 08:18 PM

View Postcptau, on 12 February 2012 - 07:48 PM, said:

The NCAA must be very unhappy at how fast some programs seem to recover from major probation and sanctions. USCw seems ready to be back as a top ten program. OSU maybe better off now with a coaching change.

Which brings up the question as to why it took UAT 8 years to recover. Self imposed sanctions from constantly making the wrong choices?

the sanctions that usc received won't be felt for another year or two. Believe me they won't be competing for much once those sanctions start to kill their depth.
2010 SOUTHEASTERN CONFERENCE CHAMPIONS
2010 BCS NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
Posted Image
"We are Auburn. That’s all that matters, not what somebody on the outside thinks or doesn’t think. We are not defined or limited by the perceptions of others. We don’t need a T-shirt from Wal Mart boasting about things that never were to boost our ego. We don’t use our battle cry as a taunt to prop up our self-esteem. Our sense of worth isn’t determined by the number of stickers and flags we can put on our car." - Never To Yield Foundation

#8 User is offline   tiger88 

  • BOT Chairman
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members-Media Access
  • Posts: 9,530
  • Joined: 21-September 03

Posted 12 February 2012 - 09:53 PM

Maybe they're gearing up to go thigh deep on bama.

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic
  • Bookmark



1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users