You want to tell an Auburn graduate, on an Auburn board, the he's an idiot for pointing out that YOU WERE WRONG , and then you tell me to go back to elementary school and start over ?
It's clear that all you're doing is trying to deflect away from the updyke trial and try to equivocate that which has absolutely nothing at all to do w/ this case. Maybe it's YOU who can't see how idiotic your claim is, and that's why you come off as a blithering moron. I don't know, and I care less.
Yes, there are delays in how the judicial system . Thanks for the 411, captain obvious. But 4 punks holding up a trailer is a far more complex case, and took place AFTER your boy updyke committed his crime. One punk has ALREADY BEEN SENTENCED, and updyke has yet to actually go to trial. You said you didn't want to hijack the thread, but that's EXACTLY what you wanted to do, and that's the point. I even quoted to you specifically the part which showed you to be wrong ( or a liar - pick one ).
Next time in T'loser, keep all your windows down. You might get a degree tossed in there as you drive though campus.
So what you are saying is that all the professionals in journalism that use phrases such as "held up a bank, held up a convenient store, held up a jewelry store", or any of the various descriptions of the building in which the victims of a robbery occurred are wrong? There are people present during those robberies.