AURaptor

Verified Member
  • Content count

    33,765
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    18

AURaptor last won the day on August 17 2016

AURaptor had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

576 Sterling

About AURaptor

  • Rank
    Not impossible. Just a bit unlikely.

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://randi.org

Profile Information

  • Interests
    C'mon, really ?
  • Location
    Somewhere in the 'verse.
  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

2,502 profile views
  1. I've noticed a reoccurring theme w/ some organizations, that when the federal $ is threatened to be taken away, they rally around and the free market ' somehow ' ponies up the $ anyways. Doesn't that only prove the point ? These are not proper functions of govt spending. Even if they're in our moral wheel house, that's not what govt is for.
  2. That's because I'm not lying, and you know I'm not lying. * Thanks for admitting I didn't lie.
  3. Not lying. That's EXACTLY what the story said. See, the problem is, you're so damn partisan, that anything anyone else says, regardless of who says it, what is said, if it in ANY way, remotely puts Trump in a favorable or less than negative light, you accuse them of LYING. Even if the info is passed on verbatim, and haven't changed 1 damn word.
  4. * I never SAID the NYT story stated that Obama wiretapped Trump. All I am showing is that it's reasonable to infer that Trump, SEEING a story in the NYT which says info about him came from wiretaps , that Obama was in some way complicit. I AM NOT LYING - You are taking my words out of context and inventing meaning to things I NEVER SAID Others in the business disagree. Like Ari Fleischer and John Crudele ( NY Post ) , the writer of this linked story, Did the New York Times Already Tell Us Trump Was 'Wiretapped'? http://nation.foxnews.com/2017/03/09/did-new-york-times-already-tell-us-trump-was-wiretapped ( not sure how the link got mixed up w/ another one ... oh well ) And btw... I'll continue to point out derogatory and baseless ad hominems for as long as they occur.
  5. Proper function of govt is what is important here. There's no case to be made, at all. Anyone w/ a brain should know this. This is nothing more than the piling on of all things RUSSIA ! because Hillary lost, and Trump won. PERIOD.
  6. Maybe. But if the NYT reports that Trump was wiretapped, and then Trump takes that report at face value... DID the NYT clarify or retract that claim ? If so, I've not heard of it. And if Trump wants to infer that TRUMP TOWERS , not just some aspect of his campaign, got wiretapped from what the NYT posted, then fine. But don't come and try spin it as if he came up w/ the claim he was wiretapped out of thin air, because he didn't. That's what so many are missing, or pretending doesn't exist.
  7. Jihad tv, aka Al Jazeera , bit it on comcast due to poor ratings. Despite Hillary giving it the " real news " seal of approval.
  8. What does that have to do with anything?
  9. Just another example of belligerent snowflakes demanding everyone think like them, or be silent.
  10. Or not. When ever I read the words " could, may, might ",... in association w/ govt funding, I automatically assume that the opposite is every bit as likely to be true. COULD be that funding to these programs is redundant, and that simply eliminating one or more of these lines of funding can still achieve the desired goals. Report: Redundant federal programs waste billions WASHINGTON — Redundant federal programs are leading to billions in waste, congressional auditors say, and the government is slow to adopt reforms to fix the problem. The White House says President Obama recognizes the problem and will propose eliminating redundant programs in the budget plan he releases Wednesday. Among the 31 areas of duplicative spending, spelled out in a report by the Government Accountability Office obtained by USA TODAY:
  11. Were they going to endorse the BLM, Islamists loving Left ? Seriously. Do keep beating this drum. It's all you have.
  12. What difference, at this point, does it make ?