Verified Member
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

501 Sterling

About creed

  • Rank
  • Birthday 01/02/1959

Contact Methods

  • Website URL

Profile Information

  • Interests
    Everything Auburn, running, and fishing.
  • Location
    Cataula, Georgia
  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

2,437 profile views
  1. I really don't get into politics like most on here, but after watching the news for a few minutes yesterday, the issues of non-government controlled hospitals having various levels of unpreparedness makes sense. Some of these hospitals have their own supply depots that run as a separate business and their goal is to minimize inventory levels to reduce costs. I think it would be difficult for the government to mandate business rules to non-government hospitals entities that contradict their for-profit mandate. So my question is, should hospitals be owned/controlled by non-government entities? Isn't the health of the citizens one of the cornerstones of our democracy?
  2. Was there really a vote to remove the president or a vote to impeach? Am I confused? Aren't both two different things?
  3. I wonder what the local merchant is thinking about in stadium alcohol sales. Will it eat into their after game sales and profits? Do they think it's a good or bad move for their business. Thoughts.
  4. Not sure about that, but I hate walking through campus after game and feel like I've entered a slum in Mumbai.
  5. Here's how I see it. The value of providing alcohol on game days will be measured by the consumer. The right product that engages the customer to participate in stadium alcohol consumption will generate $'s for the university, vendors, insurance companies, security and cleaning services. It all depends on the right product for the customer. Tuscaloosa = PBR, Schlitz or Boones Farm for the ladies Auburn = Heineken, Sam Adams or a nice Cali Chardonnay for the ladies LOL... Just to add. If the consumer doesn't participate, then in stadium alcohol sales will probably be eliminated from the game day experience.
  6. Pro: I get to choose. Con: More trash, where people who don't no how to clean up after themselves will leave in the stands or throw somewhere on campus. (My big pet peeve)
  7. There's more to the story than just increased revenue. Independent thinking suggest there's just as many pros as there are cons. How about a game of listing your pro and con.
  8. Not leaning one way or the other and just looking for feedback, but some would say this is not what our representatives, be it federal or state, should be working on by creating legislation to make legal what the NCAA says is not legal.
  9. Not sure why but something tells me college football is being prepared to be controlled by another organization other than the ncaa and their respective universities. My guess is this organization is already in place. If you think hard enough you can probably figure out who has the money, power, structure, and policies and procedures to manage college football not named the ncaa.
  10. Sometimes people should leave their opinions silent when they may not know the entire story and/or haven't walked in the same shoes as the person they're opining about.
  11. All you perfect posters on here should just leave your comments at Thank you Boobee and good luck in the future.
  12. Imagine this. College football becomes a league of "few" enforceable NCAA rules and the Ivy league schools decide to get back into "real" college football. Facilities? No problem, just take half a billion and build something spectacular. Coaching? Hire a Nick Saban for 20 million a year. Players? Chargers...shh, how about a Bentley and an education that will get you +100k if you don't make the NFL. TV? Pay the networks to broadcast the IVY channel. Games? Pay visiting teams more than they make from a home game. and still have more endowment dollars than the richest SEC league school.
  13. creed

    NFL Thread

    Pretty interesting super bowl so far. 2star Garoppolo against 3star Mahomes.