Jump to content


Platinum Donor
  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


I_M4_AU last won the day on April 1 2020

I_M4_AU had the most liked content!

About I_M4_AU

Profile Information

  • Location
    Mountains of North Carolina
  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

3,643 profile views

I_M4_AU's Achievements

Grand Master

Grand Master (14/14)

  • Dedicated Rare
  • First Post
  • Posting Machine Rare
  • Collaborator
  • Conversation Starter

Recent Badges



  1. Not the same thing. Can she be removed as easily as she was *voted* in? The rest can be agree to disagree.
  2. I agree the DOJ and courts should be more independent from the Executive Branch, but these days is appears not to be the case. I trust the states to know what is right for their particular citizens then a Federal employee. Similar to the Covid responses from the different states. What is good for Los Angeles is not good for Bozeman, Montana.
  3. No, I wouldn’t because each state gets to decide what ID is required and even though every state would then require an ID, it would not be worth the federal government *pre-clearing* re-forms as that would greatly depend on what party would be in charge of Congress. It could change ever two years. Consistency is what is required in voting.
  4. Florida has been mass-transferring residents with coronavirus out of nursing homes with outbreaks and into local hospitals since Sunday, regardless of whether they show signs of the virus. https://www.sun-sentinel.com/coronavirus/fl-ne-coronavirus-nursing-homes-mass-transfers-20200513-vdpc2txp7jeztepngt3dsk3eve-story.html This article was from May 13, 2020 about the same time Rachel transferred her mother to her sister’s home. The northern states under Democratic rule followed Gov. Cuomo’s rule of putting the elderly back in nursing homes with covid. Cuomo killed thousands of elderly in NY and he was never under investigation for wrongdoing for that horrific act. He’s a Democrat and Rachel is from a Democratic run state. There will be no investigation. This statement is the reason some on here dislike what-aboutisms. Trump and his character has nothing to do with Rachel and her character. The difference is, however, Trump was elected and, therefore, can and was voted out because of his character. Rachel was appointed even though she exhibited bad character and can not be voted out.
  5. Character should still matter. The health official responsible for overseeing nursing homes in Pennsylvania — where nearly 70 percent of the state’s coronavirus-related deaths have occurred — has reportedly moved her elderly mother out of a facility as deaths skyrocketed. Health Secretary Dr. Rachel ­Levine said Tuesday that her 95-year-old mother requested to be moved out of a personal-care home, the ABC affiliate in Harrisburg ­reported. “My mother requested, and my sister and I as her children complied, to move her to another location during the COVID-19 outbreak,” said Levine, ­according to ABC27. “My mother is 95 years old. She is very intelligent and more than competent to make her own decisions,” Levine added. After criticism from some state lawmakers for the move, Levine argued she’s working to ensure the health and safety of all state residents, according to the report. In March, Levine ordered long-term care facilities in the state to continue to accept coronavirus patients who had been discharged from hospitals but un­able to return to their homes, the Bucks County Courier Times reported. https://nypost.com/2020/05/13/pennsylvania-health-official-moved-mother-from-nursing-home/ Anybody that panics and puts coronavirus patients back in nursing homes, but then, two months later, makes provision for her own mother to leave those facilities is an elitist. This behavior is typical for politicians they should not be for health care officials.
  6. I agree with most of this statement, the problem is the bolded word. A lot of people will disagree just to disagree.
  7. You probably missed my first sentence of my post saying anybody that riots puts their own life in danger. My post was not trying to make Babbitt into a reasonable person, it was to question the *left hand not knowing what the right hand is doing* with regard to the chaotic events that took place right before she was shot. The mob mentality of the Jan. 6th riot was on full display there. The rioters were not trying to breach the secured area as long as the police officers were there, it was only after they started to leave did they attempt the breach. My questions are; who gave that order and why? It’s pretty simple and has nothing to do with whether Babbitt was being a reasonable person. She wasn’t as she was caught up in the mob mentality of the moment.
  8. Yes he did, it seems like he should read “The Art of the Deal”. I forget who the author is.
  9. People that riot are risking bodily harm and/or death. There are some questions, with regard to the actions of the Capitol Police that should be cleared up, but it seems they won’’t be. Moments before Babbitt was shot there were Police Officers protecting the doors that Babbitt was trying to crawl through. They were (it seems) commanded away. The window was then broken and she was shot by a Police Officer on the other side of the divide. Why were the Police guarding the door called away and who called them away? This, it seemed, was taken as permission to go through the doors by the rioters. This first video shows the shot. The Capitol Police Officer that shot Babbitt already had his gun drawn and was waiting for her to enter the restricted area. In this video you can see one officer raise his weapon and then give a thumbs up to someone on the other side of the doorway. The first 30 seconds of this video shows the Police Officers stepping away from the doors of the restricted area as one protester yells “They’re leaving”. Babbitt is then shot and those police officers return as they were not even down the stairs yet. Very strange behavior. I doubt we ever find out the reason the officers were commanded away from their post.
  10. Which side is using this baseless claim to overhaul our voting rights? If it was baseless, why change the voting rules?
  11. ‘I would be your president’: Clinton blames Russia, FBI chief for 2016 election loss’ https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/hillary-clinton-blames-russian-hackers-and-comey-for-2016-election-loss/2017/05/02/e62fef72-2f60-11e7-8674-437ddb6e813e_story.html Talk April 28, 2019 Why Stacey Abrams is still saying she won. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/04/28/magazine/stacey-abrams-election-georgia.html You have your head stuck up your a$$.
  12. Exactly, it was a war on democracy. Democracy being defined as *your side didn’t win*. That’s the point.
  13. Hillary Clinton has, for the last four years, blamed the loss on Russia (essentially saying she was cheated out to the Presidency) Stacy Abrams has spent the last four year saying she was the rightful governor of Georgia. She even gave a speech at the DNC espousing the same. In the governors race is Virginia the out going Governor even agreed she had been cheated out of the victory.
  • Create New...