Why don't you poll them and find out? In fact, gather their signatures while you're at it. Make sure to tell them no current or future funding will be in jeopardy regardless of their answers.
LOL. There is no "science of AGW". There is belief, similar to that of a cult as you have just alluded via your verbiage, which you embrace, worshipping knelt at the altar. There are giant leaps of faith, assumptions and unsubstantiated claims that bridge over to the delusion of AGW and CAGW. However, belief isn't science, and neither is consensus even if it swaddles you like a warm blanket. Yes, I am embarrassed by folks, especially pompous, snarky pseudointellectuals who are more driven by ideology than proof. Feel free to happily pay your carbon tithes, enjoy your Beyond Meat smorgasbords (perhaps with a side of bug snacks), and perhaps consider moving to a 15 minute city in the future. None of it will do squat to alter the climate but at least you can continue to virtue signal. That's something.
BTW, I could have sworn you were done with your discussions with me. Are you also not a man of your word? That's a shame.