Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Weagle99

  • Birthday 06/03/1981

Profile Information

  • Location
    Moody, AL
  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Weagle99's Achievements


Contributor (5/14)

  • Dedicated Rare
  • First Post
  • Collaborator
  • Reacting Well
  • Week One Done

Recent Badges



  1. Grant Loy doesn't show up in the transfer portal; Cord Sandberg does. Any chance you have them confused?
  2. While I understand where you're coming from, I don't agree. Bo has played football for half his life, and at the highest level possible. In my opinion this makes him uniquely qualified to at least have some say. If he's not qualified, who is?
  3. Found this on the Ducks sub on reddit: They're saying that the BOT meeting is just to rubber stamp his extension.
  4. If you have a membership, his articles are available here: https://scout.com/college/auburn/Article/StatTigers-Upon-Further-Review-Miss-State-at-Auburn-Game-108305098
  5. This is not relevant to the conversation. My point isn't that I called out the coaches for making a bad hire when it was done. My point is that the administration knew of his history and chose to ignore it. Whether or not I publicly objected to the hire on a forum does not change the fact that it was a bad decision.
  6. I have to respectfully disagree. This was someone who was directly responsible for us being on probation for years, regardless of how long ago it was. He was a known cheater and we put him in a position of responsibility in the program. This was, in my opinion, an inexcusably bad hire.
  7. Why was he employed to begin with? Does no one remember this? https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/sports/1991/10/21/players-tapes-reveal-payments-at-auburn/a8d35ad0-6609-4586-8549-27227ea015f4/?utm_term=.bbbefa3970ae
  8. From the article: "Greg Sankey is essentially making fun of the Auburn to the SEC East discussion. Says it’s not talked about except int he media. — Dan Wolken (@DanWolken) May 30, 2017" and "Sankey on the Auburn to the SEC East: "It's not on the agenda." Sankey is making fun of the entire discussion brought up by Pat Dye. — Matthew Stevens (@matthewcstevens) May 30, 2017" Can someone explain why that's "making fun of Auburn". I'm not sure I see it. Sankey only said that it wasn't on the agenda to discuss; what makes this "making fun of Auburn"?
  9. Whenever someone mentions alot, I think of this: http://hyperboleandahalf.blogspot.com/2010/04/alot-is-better-than-you-at-everything.html?m=1
  • Create New...