Verified Member
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

16 Good

About savorytiger

  • Rank

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Does Joe even play in the 2nd half?
  2. He gave up a first down to land that hit, and then got sent out of the game. Also, I'm just starting to wonder if the refs are purposefully just not throwing as many flags this game in general. Lots of missed calls already for both sides.
  3. We're going to end up being the only team to hold them under 35 all year...
  4. He saw the UGA performance and actually came back. Hopefully that means there's something real there that he liked.
  5. I really enjoyed Gary talking about not seeing a hold while watching at a video of Derrick getting his eye gouged.
  6. 22nd while he's the only one with a 2000 birthday is impressive.
  7. The US is in a pretty divided state. I think it's just as likely that if the situation was reversed (Democratic president, democratic nominee) that Republicans would feel the same way. Is there really any evidence that one side or the other is "more" partisan than the other? Would it be a huge waste of time to try to debate that? Probably :P.
  8. I see where you're coming from, but it seems more reasonable that Democrats would disagree with a nomination based on a difference in beliefs than Republicans supporting a nominee even if there is proof of sexual assault...
  9. Against my usual instincts I clicked on the link, and even the article mentions that the original estimate of the contract was $3B, Trump claimed at some point it had reached $4B, and then after the "deal" (article calls it "informal") they now say it's worth $5B. It's all too handwavy for me, and I wouldn't mind learning some details about the deal. If they took out some unnecessary additions to the planes, then that's a good thing. If something else was promised to Boeing, then we judge based on what was promised.
  10. Cool, so next time instead of assuming no one else knows anything either, you'll actually try to learn about the issue at hand so you can prove them wrong. Glad I could help :).
  11. It's sad that your only argument is to try to drag everyone else down to your level of ignorance.
  12. Um... Peter Strzok was fired for this, so that's not true. I'll also welcome any scrutiny into the evidence brought forth by him. Even without any evidence of bias the evidence that comes out of this investigation should be viewed carefully.
  13. Are you saying disliking Trump carries the same amount of bias and possibility of having it affect the person's job performance as being a Klan member? Would you doubt the entire police department if the sheriff was removed immediately after they found out he was a Klan member?
  14. How can you say he hasn't done enough? Trump even dedicated his golf trophy to Puerto Rico!
  15. There's too much in this thread to address all of it, but the Obama quote refers to vote tampering in particular. There's more to influencing an election than changing the votes themselves. The most widely referenced form is social media which Facebook has admitted happened: (which has a link to the FB white paper on the issue which I admit I have not read because who actually has the time for that?). Now if you actually listened or watched the Comey or Sessions testimony, you'll see that they all reference Russian interference into the 2016 elections as a fact. Not one person denied it. You'd think that if some one says something untrue in these hearings that the other side would point it out. Whether collusion occurred is a much different matter and Senator Cotton was not challenged when he said that they (the Senate committee) have not seen any evidence of it. Oh, and the Senate just voted 97-2 to raise sanctions with Russia in response to the interference to our 2016 elections. EDIT: going to try to refrain from that stuff even in the smack talk forum.