Null



DKW 86

Admin Emeritus
  • Content Count

    25,872
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

2,692 Sterling

About DKW 86

  • Rank
    IAM4 Member
  • Birthday 02/11/1962

Contact Methods

  • AIM
    davidkward86
  • Website URL
    http://www.facebook.com/#!/david.k.ward.3

Profile Information

  • Location
    Decatur, AL

Recent Profile Visitors

2,851 profile views
  1. I dont think they have thought all this thru. I really dont. You come at the Trump, you best not miss. Why are the Democrats committing constitutional suicide? Daniel McCarthy I wonder why they chose this route. If Bolton et al do get called to testify, doesnt that PROVE that the second charge was crazy? All he did on thies was exert Executive Privilege. Like Obama and every president before him. This is not nefarious. Charging him with crimes not committed is just crazy. Was Trump "planning" to withhold funds for an investigation? Maybe. Did he actually do that? Nope. Did Trump Exert Executive privilege? Yes. The HOR way around that was to go to the courts because the charges were so serious!!!!!!! <er> THEY THEN SAT ON THE IMPEACHMENT CHARGES FOR A MONTH, thereby proving there was no reason for secret hearings and Obstruction of Congress Charges. This bunch of dild%^s is going to screw all this up. Just watch.
  2. Yes...It seems to have lit a fire under the Bernie Supporters...
  3. Yea, sure...If you had 10,000 Dems and Progressives in a room you might get a handful that were mildly upset. Brother, I am sorry, but saying that there was anything more than a whiff in the MSM or even in the second tier media is just nutz. Whatever Obama did when he was droning half the middle east did one thing, it kept the world from all out war and kept our troops from full scale warfare. But the droning did so much damage to our relations in the ME, we wont recover for decades. We were droning down whole wedding parties, schools, etc The collateral damage was huge. And all but a very very few were fine with it at the time. I think we need to get out of the ME and let the Russians and the Europe deal with them. They are 50 or more years from democracy or freedom. It is just not in them now and might not be then.
  4. FISA Court Not Apolitical in Addressing Spying Abuses Against Trump Campaign The news of whom the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) Court has just appointed to oversee FBI fixes is nothing short of breathtaking. On Jan. 10, the FISA court posted an order naming anti-Trump lawyer David Kris to “assist the court” in assessing the FBI’s response to the court-ordered cleanup of lapses and abuses identified by Department of Justice Inspector General (IG) Michael Horowitz. In a report released in December 2019, the IG found that FBI officials violated rules, policies, and law in their applications to wiretap Trump 2016 presidential campaign volunteer Carter Page. Horowitz testified that the FISA surveillance process needs to be fixed “from top to bottom.” To some, the appointment of Kris to help with the job is as mysterious as to why the FISA court’s judges failed to flag the FBI abuses on their own. It would seem more important than ever to have an apolitical person, or a balanced group of people, conducting oversight of these politically sensitive matters. Kris’s vocal criticisms of President Donald Trump present numerous, obvious conflicts of interest. On Twitter, Kris called Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) “a politicized, dishonest [Intelligence Community] overseer who attempts to mislead,” and wrote that Trump and his advisers should be “worried” that the “walls are closing in” regarding the Mueller probe. Kris also bought into the now-disproven conspiracy theory about Trump colluding with Russia and Putin But even more importantly, since that time, Kris has advocated for Trump’s removal. “Do we want to be a country in which elected officials can use their governmental power to attack political opponents? If not, it’s pretty simple: Trump has to go,” Kris wrote on Twitter in October 2019. Specifically, Kris criticized what he said was Trump using government powers against political opponents, seeming to dismiss the possibility that the government had used its powers improperly against Trump. In addition, Kris writes for the blog “Lawfare” and has called Lawfare’s Editor-in-Chief Benjamin Wittes “incisive.” Wittes is the man who wrote of the need for an “insurance policy” against Trump prior to Trump’s election: Wittes also is a friend of former FBI Director James Comey, who was referred for criminal charges for mishandling and leaking government information in his anti-Trump efforts. (The Justice Department declined to prosecute, with officials stating they didn’t believe Comey meant any harm.) Horowitz flagged 17 mistakes in the FBI’s surveillance applications against Page and testified, “I think it’s fair for people to … look at all these 17 events and wonder how it could be purely incompetence.” Likewise, one could look at the FISA court’s appointment of Kris to help fix things … and wonder whether it could be purely incompetence. The latest FISA court action could be construed as a moment of chilling clarity in the ongoing questions about how these abuses could have occurred, and the challenges with fixing them.
  5. Summation: A member of a bipartisan group in the HOR has asked the Senate to use formal rules of evidence used for 200+ years be formally adopted for Impeachment. If we went by 200 years of jurisprudence, the charge of Obstruction of Congress would be tossed before the trial part even started and no witnesses that the HOR suddenly now wants, but did not even depose, would also be tossed. Grownups and all their logic be damned. This is going nowhere and thanks to a rushed Impeachment process likely should not be going anywhere. Why did the HOR not wait until the courts had spoken? Politics. They never took this serious and the grownups know why.
  6. I will likely support whomever comes out of the primaries short of Biden. He is just too old and too damaged. He has said and done things that more than make my skin crawl. I like Pete, but he may be too young. I like Tulsi, but the DNC seems to want to destroy her for standing up to them in 2016. I like Warren but she just doesnt age well in the campaign. I like Bernie, but I am afraid the DNC will stop him yet again.
  7. Boeing’s 737 Max Software Outsourced to $9-an-Hour Engineers It remains the mystery at the heart of Boeing Co.’s 737 Max crisis: how a company renowned for meticulous design made seemingly basic software mistakes leading to a pair of deadly crashes. Longtime Boeing engineers say the effort was complicated by a push to outsource work to lower-paid contractors. The Max software -- plagued by issues that could keep the planes grounded months longer after U.S. regulators this week revealed a new flaw -- was developed at a time Boeing was laying off experienced engineers and pressing suppliers to cut costs. Increasingly, the iconic American planemaker and its subcontractors have relied on temporary workers making as little as $9 an hour to develop and test software, often from countries lacking a deep background in aerospace -- notably India. Boeing 737 Max prepares for take off during testing in 2016. Photographer: Mike Kane/Bloomberg Related: Pilots Flagged Software Problems on Boeing Jets Besides Max In offices across from Seattle’s Boeing Field, recent college graduates employed by the Indian software developer HCL Technologies Ltd. occupied several rows of desks, said Mark Rabin, a former Boeing software engineer who worked in a flight-test group that supported the Max. The coders from HCL were typically designing to specifications set by Boeing. Still, “it was controversial because it was far less efficient than Boeing engineers just writing the code,” Rabin said. Frequently, he recalled, “it took many rounds going back and forth because the code was not done correctly.” Boeing’s cultivation of Indian companies appeared to pay other dividends. In recent years, it has won several orders for Indian military and commercial aircraft, such as a $22 billion one in January 2017 to supply SpiceJet Ltd. That order included 100 737-Max 8 jets and represented Boeing’s largest order ever from an Indian airline, a coup in a country dominated by Airbus. Based on resumes posted on social media, HCL engineers helped develop and test the Max’s flight-display software, while employees from another Indian company, Cyient Ltd., handled software for flight-test equipment. Costly Delay In one post, an HCL employee summarized his duties with a reference to the now-infamous model, which started flight tests in January 2016: “Provided quick workaround to resolve production issue which resulted in not delaying flight test of 737-Max (delay in each flight test will cost very big amount for Boeing).” Boeing said the company did not rely on engineers from HCL and Cyient for the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System, which has been linked to the Lion Air crash last October and the Ethiopian Airlines disaster in March. The Chicago-based planemaker also said it didn’t rely on either firm for another software issue disclosed after the crashes: a cockpit warning light that wasn’t working for most buyers. “Boeing has many decades of experience working with supplier/partners around the world,” a company spokesman said. “Our primary focus is on always ensuring that our products and services are safe, of the highest quality and comply with all applicable regulations.” In a statement, HCL said it “has a strong and long-standing business relationship with The Boeing Company, and we take pride in the work we do for all our customers. However, HCL does not comment on specific work we do for our customers. HCL is not associated with any ongoing issues with 737 Max.” Recent simulator tests by the Federal Aviation Administration suggest the software issues on Boeing’s best-selling model run deeper. The company’s shares fell this week after the regulator found a further problem with a computer chip that experienced a lag in emergency response when it was overwhelmed with data. Engineers who worked on the Max, which Boeing began developing eight years ago to match a rival Airbus SE plane, have complained of pressure from managers to limit changes that might introduce extra time or cost. “Boeing was doing all kinds of things, everything you can imagine, to reduce cost, including moving work from Puget Sound, because we’d become very expensive here,” said Rick Ludtke, a former Boeing flight controls engineer laid off in 2017. “All that’s very understandable if you think of it from a business perspective. Slowly over time it appears that’s eroded the ability for Puget Sound designers to design.” Rabin, the former software engineer, recalled one manager saying at an all-hands meeting that Boeing didn’t need senior engineers because its products were mature. “I was shocked that in a room full of a couple hundred mostly senior engineers we were being told that we weren’t needed,” said Rabin, who was laid off in 2015. Boeing 737 Max Timeline Boeing could take three more months to fix the latest software glitch on the 737 Max, its best-selling model. (Source: TicToc) The typical jetliner has millions of parts -- and millions of lines of code -- and Boeing has long turned over large portions of the work to suppliers who follow its detailed design blueprints. Starting with the 787 Dreamliner, launched in 2004, it sought to increase profits by instead providing high-level specifications and then asking suppliers to design more parts themselves. The thinking was “they’re the experts, you see, and they will take care of all of this stuff for us,” said Frank McCormick, a former Boeing flight-controls software engineer who later worked as a consultant to regulators and manufacturers. “This was just nonsense.” Sales are another reason to send the work overseas. In exchange for an $11 billion order in 2005 from Air India, Boeing promised to invest $1.7 billion in Indian companies. That was a boon for HCL and other software developers from India, such as Cyient, whose engineers were widely used in computer-services industries but not yet prominent in aerospace. Rockwell Collins, which makes cockpit electronics, had been among the first aerospace companies to source significant work in India in 2000, when HCL began testing software there for the Cedar Rapids, Iowa-based company. By 2010, HCL employed more than 400 people at design, development and verification centers for Rockwell Collins in Chennai and Bangalore. That same year, Boeing opened what it called a “center of excellence” with HCL in Chennai, saying the companies would partner “to create software critical for flight test.” In 2011, Boeing named Cyient, then known as Infotech, to a list of its “suppliers of the year” for design, stress analysis and software engineering on the 787 and the 747-8 at another center in Hyderabad. The Boeing rival also relies in part on offshore engineers. In addition to supporting sales, the planemakers say global design teams add efficiency as they work around the clock. But outsourcing has long been a sore point for some Boeing engineers, who, in addition to fearing job losses say it has led to communications issues and mistakes. Moscow Mistakes Boeing has also expanded a design center in Moscow. At a meeting with a chief 787 engineer in 2008, one staffer complained about sending drawings back to a team in Russia 18 times before they understood that the smoke detectors needed to be connected to the electrical system, said Cynthia Cole, a former Boeing engineer who headed the engineers’ union from 2006 to 2010. “Engineering started becoming a commodity,” said Vance Hilderman, who co-founded a company called TekSci that supplied aerospace contract engineers and began losing work to overseas competitors in the early 2000s. U.S.-based avionics companies in particular moved aggressively, shifting more than 30% of their software engineering offshore versus 10% for European-based firms in recent years, said Hilderman, an avionics safety consultant with three decades of experience whose recent clients include most of the major Boeing suppliers. With a strong dollar, a big part of the attraction was price. Engineers in India made around $5 an hour; it’s now $9 or $10, compared with $35 to $40 for those in the U.S. on an H1B visa, he said. But he’d tell clients the cheaper hourly wage equated to more like $80 because of the need for supervision, and he said his firm won back some business to fix mistakes. HCL, once known as Hindustan Computers, was founded in 1976 by billionaire Shiv Nadar and now has more than $8.6 billion in annual sales. With 18,000 employees in the U.S. and 15,000 in Europe, HCL is a global company and has deep expertise in computing, said Sukamal Banerjee, a vice president. It has won business from Boeing on that basis, not on price, he said: “We came from a strong R&D background.” Still, for the 787, HCL gave Boeing a remarkable price – free, according to Sam Swaro, an associate vice president who pitched HCL’s services at a San Diego conference sponsored by Avionics International magazine in June. He said the company took no up-front payments on the 787 and only started collecting payments based on sales years later, an “innovative business model” he offered to extend to others in the industry. The 787 entered service three years late and billions of dollars over budget in 2011, in part because of confusion introduced by the outsourcing strategy. Under Dennis Muilenburg, a longtime Boeing engineer who became chief executive in 2015, the company has said that it planned to bring more work back in-house for its newest planes. Engineer Backwater The Max became Boeing’s top seller soon after it was offered in 2011. But for ambitious engineers, it was something of a “backwater,” said Peter Lemme, who designed the 767’s automated flight controls and is now a consultant. The Max was an update of a 50-year-old design, and the changes needed to be limited enough that Boeing could produce the new planes like cookie cutters, with few changes for either the assembly line or airlines. “As an engineer that’s not the greatest job,” he said. Rockwell Collins, now a unit of United Technologies Corp., won the Max contract for cockpit displays, and it has relied in part on HCL engineers in India, Iowa and the Seattle area. A United Technologies spokeswoman didn’t respond to a request for comment. Boeing 737 Max airplanes at the company’s manufacturing facility in Renton, Washington. Photographer: David Ryder/Bloomberg Contract engineers from Cyient helped test flight test equipment. Charles LoveJoy, a former flight-test instrumentation design engineer at the company, said engineers in the U.S. would review drawings done overnight in India every morning at 7:30 a.m. “We did have our challenges with the India team,” he said. “They met the requirements, per se, but you could do it better.” Multiple investigations – including a Justice Department criminal probe – are trying to unravel how and when critical decisions were made about the Max’s software. During the crashes of Lion Air and Ethiopian Airlines planes that killed 346 people, investigators suspect, the MCAS system pushed the planes into uncontrollable dives because of bad data from a single sensor. That design violated basic principles of redundancy for generations of Boeing engineers, and the company apparently never tested to see how the software would respond, Lemme said. “It was a stunning fail,” he said. “A lot of people should have thought of this problem – not one person – and asked about it.” Boeing also has disclosed that it learned soon after Max deliveries began in 2017 that a warning light that might have alerted crews to the issue with the sensor wasn’t installed correctly in the flight-display software. A Boeing statement in May, explaining why the company didn’t inform regulators at the time, said engineers had determined it wasn’t a safety issue. “Senior company leadership,” the statement added, “was not involved in the review.”
  8. 1) It was already finalized before they rolled it out. The author means the second iteration. The first iteration was finalized, blessed, certified, and killed people. 2) That is why you dont rush it into service and you test test and re test.
  9. All they had to do was take some more time and they would have gotten the software glitch out. Funny, for a little bit more time they could have saved all this and already gotten the engine issues fixed. All this so they could rush a plane into service slightly faster...
  10. Any number of people from authors to a huge number of NON-American Journalists. Is this really that hard for you? Or are you just trying to be contrarian? There were LEs out there looking into the first assault. Tartaglione was just cleared. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/08/16/epsteins-ex-cellmate-cleared-after-probe-into-earlier-suicide-attempt-lawyer.html
  11. This guy is lying on national television and folks, he is doing an admirable job. its still lies, but he seems convincing.
  12. Yes, it was. But there were plenty of people still looking into that. That video wanted by several legal entities.
  13. I posted this on FB. Do we all realize that there are people DEAD because of how bad this schmuck is at his job? That is blood money, pure and simple. I got a thumbsdown for that? lmbo...
  14. So is it out of office or impeach. Wish you would make up your mind.
  15. Surveillance Video Outside Jeffrey Epstein’s Cell Was Deleted In Clerical Error, Jail Says So the FBP cannot even save a video tape of one of the most important jail birds they have had in custody in the last 5 years?