bigbird

I'm not sure why we continued to run IZ against their alignment, they were giving us the edge all night. However, we rarely called designated outside runs except the jet sweeps. If we had called a buck sweep with KMart, he would've scored almost every time. KMart needs to consistently be a part of this offense. I agree that we should've worked on our RZ game. Wildcat is not the answer against MSU, LSU, UGA, or UA. Fades, rubs, China, slant, digs need to be a part of our RZ arsenal Our passing was better, but routes were still long developing and would've been exposed against a pass rush. Our tree still seems limited to post, and deep outs. I'm not confident in us being able to get 5 yards on 3rd and 4 passing the ball like Clemson does with Renfrow.

Not sure

Only if you want to get beat. Good receiver's will slow down and look, just to get the DB to turn, and when they do, they accelerate leaving the DB 5 yards behind.

Those 2 passes were both back shoulder throws that were just 50/50. When you are in phase, running full speed, and the wr stops and pivots into the ball, its hard for a DB to turn and find the ball. That's what makes that play almost impossible to defend. That's why DBs are taught to turn into the wr and play the ball through the catch. We were in position, just couldn't make they play. The DB played throught the "basket" just like you're taught. Clemson just made the plays. Thats how it goes sometimes.

Its a lot of people's pet peeve. This isn't a shot at anyone, but the problem is the level of understanding of the position and what is actually occurring during the play. The corner and whether he plays the ball or the man is completely dictated on his position relative to the receiver. That positioning is dictated by what type of coverage, which technique, and what leverage is being applied.

Exactly

Because we dont run the read-option. The only options we run are RPOs.

37. So when we hit that number, please start another thread to let us know its time. Thanks for the cooperation.

US: 45 them: 0 I want a shutout!

Big time get!

The wNBA

If the 4-2-5 was such a failure, then why do we run it 90% of the time?

But we'd lose 1/3 of the site including Golf

I'm not saying every year, but that is what happens. Tamu, OM, MSU, AU, LSU, ARK are all gonna snipe at least 1 game year from someone they shouldn't. Look, I'm as frustrated as most at the lack of preparedness, the poor player utilization, and inability to adjust both yearly as well as in-game. To me, there should be zero excuses for those 3 things. However, there are things that mitigate poor records like injuries and youth.

Fair choices, but again if they played in the SECw, they would all have between 1-3 losses a year...IMO. I agree about dabo/Clemson being what Gus/Auburn should be as far as stability in the program