Verified Member
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


AFTiger last won the day on November 6 2009

AFTiger had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

103 Sterling

About AFTiger

  • Rank
    Supersonic Auburn Fan

Contact Methods

  • Website URL

Profile Information

  • Location
    Birmingham, AL
  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Yes. AGW is a hoax. No science, just computer models that don't reflect reality. There is ample evidence that climate change is natural and man caused. You just reject any study whose findings do not agree with your firmly held beliefs. I have been trying to educate you for some time now but you will not listen to facts.
  2. Well we must acknowledge that the IPCC is political organization and your favorite web site Skeptical Science is agenda driven. The problem with the consensus argument is that is depends the opinion of the reviewer. Reviewers read the same extract and come to different interpretations. All scientists will say that humans contribute but differ on the extent. From esteemed climate scientist Dr. Roy Spencer: "For decades now those of us trying to publish papers which depart from the climate doom-and-gloom narrative have noticed a trend toward both biased and sloppy peer review of research submitted for publication in scientific journals."
  3. Inside the AGW alarmist's shouting is a myopic version of facts. Ignored is the effects of planetary mechanics and the effect on climate. There also a determined attempt to block anything contrary to their belief system. Clinging to much debunked 97% consensus is a good example of their attachment to flawed science. Over 450 Peer-Reviewed Scientific Papers Challenging Man-Made Global Warming
  4. sci·en·tif·ic meth·od noun a method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses. "criticism is the backbone of the scientific method" Facts are funny things. Add them all up and climate change is natural.
  5. Are these so climate scientists real scientists. They clearly don't believe in the scientific method. There are some differences between Lysenko and Will Happer. Lysenko didn’t just criticise his opponents, he had his opponents executed, or had them deported to socialist death camps. As far as I know President Trump doesn’t plan to allow Will Happer to execute anyone, though some people might suffer acute public embarrassment when Will Happer finds mistakes in their work. Climategate is full of climate scientists expressing outrage at having their work reviewed, and discussing strategies to evade freedom of information requests for data and method, but the sums of money expected for addressing the climate “crisis” – billions, even trillions of dollars – in my opinion make opposition to review utterly unacceptable.
  6. I forget, what was Colin Sexton's suspension?
  7. Take away Media Matters tax exemptions for a start.
  8. If you don't like him, there are plenty of other opinion shows. Just try to avoid CNN or MSNBC. They are garbage and will make your brain atrophy.
  9. From the ever demented racist Don Lemon and terminally stupid Chris Cuomo They want Fox News eliminated and only their voiced heard.
  10. Political affiliation has nothing to do with ideology. I was wonder if you held the same outrage for leftist commentators who say outrageous things.
  11. I assume that you will liberal hosts accountable for their stupid statements.