AFTiger

Verified Member
  • Content count

    4,424
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

AFTiger last won the day on November 6 2009

AFTiger had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

59 Sterling

About AFTiger

  • Rank
    Supersonic Auburn Fan

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://

Profile Information

  • Location
    Birmingham, AL
  • Gender
    Not Telling
  1. secsports.com has it starting at noon.
  2. Homer, politics has nothing to do with my conclusions. Al Gore introduced politics to climate science years ago. If you have to modify actual data to justify projections then you have introduced bias to the conclusions. You have chosen to ignore the scientific method and have chosen to accept the religion of AGW. As far as projections are concerned, global warming is based on climate models and the models are wrong. From a real scientist: http://www.drroyspencer.com/2014/02/95-of-climate-models-agree-the-observations-must-be-wrong/
  3. Home, Alexva, when you resort to calling us names, you belong in the smack talk, not here. Anyway about that data manipulation:
  4. Ah the anti-science folks weigh in. You can manipulate data to say anything you want. Such as pasting instrumental temperatures to paleo derived estimates to create a graph that resembles a hockey stick.
  5. https://www.epa.gov/climate-indicators/climate-change-indicators-high-and-low-temperatures Depends on where you start your charting. When you omit the hottest weather from the 1930s it looks bad. When you include that data, today's weather looks pretty good.
  6. EXCLUSIVE: Study Finds Temperature Adjustments Account For ‘Nearly All Of The Warming’ In Climate Data A new study found adjustments made to global surface temperature readings by scientists in recent years “are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data.” “Thus, it is impossible to conclude from the three published [global average surface temperature (GAST)] data sets that recent years have been the warmest ever – despite current claims of record setting warming,” according to a studypublished June 27 by two scientists and a veteran statistician. The peer-reviewed study tried to validate current surface temperature datasets managed by NASA, NOAA and the UK’s Met Office, all of which make adjustments to raw thermometer readings. Skeptics of man-made global warming have criticized the adjustments. Climate scientists often apply adjustments to surface temperature thermometers to account for “biases” in the data. The new study doesn’t question the adjustments themselves but notes nearly all of them increase the warming trend. Basically, “cyclical pattern in the earlier reported data has very nearly been ‘adjusted’ out” of temperature readings taken from weather stations, buoys, ships and other sources. More: http://dailycaller.com/2017/07/05/exclusive-study-finds-temperature-adjustments-account-for-nearly-all-of-the-warming-in-climate-data/
  7. Here we go again. Leftist hate of successful people. The entire system is broken by years of interference by well meaning idiots. How about cutting out the the abuse of medicaid. BTW, If the rich pay most of the taxes, why can't they have a tax break?
  8. Ok. How about the rest? The individual with a $2,000 monthly premium and a $6,000 deductible?
  9. So it sounds like you actually believed Obama care worked.
  10. Protesting a bill about which they knew nothing. Seriously?
  11. What specifically in the bill were they protesting. Wheelchairs are always good camera fodder.
  12. Unlike many, I get it from legitimate scientists. The cartoons illustrate it well.
  13. We hear from the science denier.