au_bsci_04 407 Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 Updates from his Twitter: - Announcement date August 8th. - Top 12 April 11th. - Says he and Dylan Humble (@humble10) are a package deal. Keith says @Humble10 is an account for TD Moultry. The header pick for that account looks like TD & I found tweets referencing TD w/ that handle. If they do end up a package deal that may not be good for us if TD is really leaning to Bama. I thought so, but couldn't immediately verify. I think most schools would be fine with a package deal of 2 highly rated recruits. Agree on bama. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aujeff11 6,243 Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 Updates from his Twitter: - Announcement date August 8th. - Top 12 April 11th. - Says he and Dylan Humble (@humble10) are a package deal. Issuing ultimatums is not a good way to win friends and influence people. Maybe Jax State will be a good place for the buddy system? We will take both in a heartbeat. Why anybody even believes the package deal talk is ridiculous. That stuff never materializes out that way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ellitor 33,062 Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 Updates from his Twitter: - Announcement date August 8th. - Top 12 April 11th. - Says he and Dylan Humble (@humble10) are a package deal. Keith says @Humble10 is an account for TD Moultry. The header pick for that account looks like TD & I found tweets referencing TD w/ that handle. If they do end up a package deal that may not be good for us if TD is really leaning to Bama. I thought so, but couldn't immediately verify. I think most schools would be fine with a package deal of 2 highly rated recruits. Agree on bama. Also confirmed in al.com & SECC.com articles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikey 16,545 Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 Ah, so the "buddy deal" is not with a kid named Dylan Humble as stated above, but actually with T.D. Moultry, another of our top LB targets. So are we still "in great shape" with those four top LB prospects or has our list of four that we are in great shape with dwindled down to one or two? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarDamnEagleWDE 12,737 Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 Ah, so the "buddy deal" is not with a kid named Dylan Humble as stated above, but actually with T.D. Moultry, another of our top LB targets. So are we still "in great shape" with those four top LB prospects or has our list of four that we are in great shape with dwindled down to one or two? AU's list has at least 8 to 10 Lbers on it. This class of LBers is loaded. Looks like Britt has shoot up AU's list and AU is pushing for a commit. Going to sign one hell of a LBer class, on paper, this year. You can count on that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ellitor 33,062 Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 (edited) Ah, so the "buddy deal" is not with a kid named Dylan Humble as stated above, but actually with T.D. Moultry, another of our top LB targets. So are we still "in great shape" with those four top LB prospects or has our list of four that we are in great shape with dwindled down to one or two? Well it appears we may have lost good shape status w/ Moultry but we can still land him. On the other hand we appear to be in good shape w/ KJ per reports. If true that would mean we are still in good shape w/ 4 of the 9 in the T-Will LB recruiting thread: Ignont, Benton KJ, & Wooten. Edited March 22, 2016 by ellitor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarDamnEagleWDE 12,737 Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 Ah, so the "buddy deal" is not with a kid named Dylan Humble as stated above, but actually with T.D. Moultry, another of our top LB targets. So are we still "in great shape" with those four top LB prospects or has our list of four that we are in great shape with dwindled down to one or two? Well it appears we may have lost good shape status w/ Moultry but we can still land him. On the other hand we appear to be in good shape w/ KJ per reports. If true that would mean we are still in good shape w/ 4 of the 9 in the T-Will LB recruiting thread: Ignont, Benton KJ, & Wooten. AU is still in good shape with TD. Just me on this. If AU can get 5 of it's top 6 at Lber, AU will take 5. So I'm told. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mustache eagle 2,388 Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 Updates from his Twitter: - Announcement date August 8th. - Top 12 April 11th. - Says he and Dylan Humble (@humble10) are a package deal. Issuing ultimatums is not a good way to win friends and influence people. Maybe Jax State will be a good place for the buddy system? We will take both in a heartbeat. Why anybody even believes the package deal talk is ridiculous. That stuff never materializes out that way. i always get a kick out of the whole "package deal" thing ... in my uneducated opinion, it almost "guarantees" that the 2 kids WON'T play in college together ... they will eventually say they had to do what was right for themselves (as they should). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
au_bsci_04 407 Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 The funny twist to this is that they say they will announce for the same school but on different days. Just kind of feels like a set-up. Will be pleasantly surprised to sign both! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aujeff11 6,243 Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 The funny twist to this is that they say they will announce for the same school but on different days. Just kind of feels like a set-up. Will be pleasantly surprised to sign both! ;)/> Seemingly, one would think that a recruit would love for his choice to be just as unknown as the previous one so the guessing game can be played out among the fans.In this case, the recruit that commits first would be essentially announcing where the second guy is playing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thaitopher 807 Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 The funny twist to this is that they say they will announce for the same school but on different days. Just kind of feels like a set-up. Will be pleasantly surprised to sign both! ;)/> Seemingly, one would think that a recruit would love for his choice to be just as unknown as the previous one so the guessing game can be played out among the fans.In this case, the recruit that commits first would be essentially announcing where the second guy is playing. Good to see you posting again on the recruiting forum Jeff. Although, not as snarky this time as you often are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ellitor 33,062 Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 The funny twist to this is that they say they will announce for the same school but on different days. Just kind of feels like a set-up. Will be pleasantly surprised to sign both! ;)/> Seemingly, one would think that a recruit would love for his choice to be just as unknown as the previous one so the guessing game can be played out among the fans.In this case, the recruit that commits first would be essentially announcing where the second guy is playing. That'seven assuming they pick the same school. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUpreacherman22 3,873 Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 Ah, so the "buddy deal" is not with a kid named Dylan Humble as stated above, but actually with T.D. Moultry, another of our top LB targets. So are we still "in great shape" with those four top LB prospects or has our list of four that we are in great shape with dwindled down to one or two? Well it appears we may have lost good shape status w/ Moultry but we can still land him. On the other hand we appear to be in good shape w/ KJ per reports. If true that would mean we are still in good shape w/ 4 of the 9 in the T-Will LB recruiting thread: Ignont, Benton KJ, & Wooten. Currently, those are my top 4 in this class. That would be an Amazing Haul if we land all 4 of those kids! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aujeff11 6,243 Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 The funny twist to this is that they say they will announce for the same school but on different days. Just kind of feels like a set-up. Will be pleasantly surprised to sign both! ;)/> Seemingly, one would think that a recruit would love for his choice to be just as unknown as the previous one so the guessing game can be played out among the fans.In this case, the recruit that commits first would be essentially announcing where the second guy is playing. That'seven assuming they pick the same school. According to B Matthews, they are planning on picking the same school. Planning being the operative word. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aujeff11 6,243 Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 The funny twist to this is that they say they will announce for the same school but on different days. Just kind of feels like a set-up. Will be pleasantly surprised to sign both! ;)/> Seemingly, one would think that a recruit would love for his choice to be just as unknown as the previous one so the guessing game can be played out among the fans.In this case, the recruit that commits first would be essentially announcing where the second guy is playing. Good to see you posting again on the recruiting forum Jeff. Although, not as snarky this time as you often are. :)/> Take cover when it happens again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUbritt 611 Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 He looks to have a good frame to pack some serious muscle. I agree, he does have a good name. Oh, did you say 'frame'? Welcome back, Jeff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cole256 17,039 Posted March 22, 2016 Share Posted March 22, 2016 I mean if they are a package who cares? They are both high level Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
au_bsci_04 407 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 The funny twist to this is that they say they will announce for the same school but on different days. Just kind of feels like a set-up. Will be pleasantly surprised to sign both! ;)/> Seemingly, one would think that a recruit would love for his choice to be just as unknown as the previous one so the guessing game can be played out among the fans.In this case, the recruit that commits first would be essentially announcing where the second guy is playing. That'seven assuming they pick the same school. According to B Matthews, they are planning on picking the same school. Planning being the operative word. Yes, but what we are saying is that's only an issue if you believe this is straight up. They may have all the intentions in the world to be a package deal, but as many have said that rarely pans out. In the event it doesn't, the suspense to see if it does is just as much of a game as everything else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ellitor 33,062 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 The funny twist to this is that they say they will announce for the same school but on different days. Just kind of feels like a set-up. Will be pleasantly surprised to sign both! ;)/> Seemingly, one would think that a recruit would love for his choice to be just as unknown as the previous one so the guessing game can be played out among the fans.In this case, the recruit that commits first would be essentially announcing where the second guy is playing. That'seven assuming they pick the same school. According to B Matthews, they are planning on picking the same school. Planning being the operative word. Yes & I know. In the line of reporters reporting it BMatt is about 6th. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ellitor 33,062 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 The funny twist to this is that they say they will announce for the same school but on different days. Just kind of feels like a set-up. Will be pleasantly surprised to sign both! ;)/> Seemingly, one would think that a recruit would love for his choice to be just as unknown as the previous one so the guessing game can be played out among the fans.In this case, the recruit that commits first would be essentially announcing where the second guy is playing. That'seven assuming they pick the same school. According to B Matthews, they are planning on picking the same school. Planning being the operative word. Yes, but what we are saying is that's only an issue if you believe this is straight up. They may have all the intentions in the world to be a package deal, but as many have said that rarely pans out. In the event it doesn't, the suspense to see if it does is just as much of a game as everything else. Yup & another factor could be KJ does not appear to be high on Bama right now. Not sure if they are not high on him or what but that's where things appear to be right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarDamnEagleWDE 12,737 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 The funny twist to this is that they say they will announce for the same school but on different days. Just kind of feels like a set-up. Will be pleasantly surprised to sign both! ;)/> Seemingly, one would think that a recruit would love for his choice to be just as unknown as the previous one so the guessing game can be played out among the fans.In this case, the recruit that commits first would be essentially announcing where the second guy is playing. That'seven assuming they pick the same school. According to B Matthews, they are planning on picking the same school. Planning being the operative word. Yes, but what we are saying is that's only an issue if you believe this is straight up. They may have all the intentions in the world to be a package deal, but as many have said that rarely pans out. In the event it doesn't, the suspense to see if it does is just as much of a game as everything else. Yup & another factor could be KJ does not appear to be high on Bama right now. Not sure if they are not high on him or what but that's where things appear to be right now. uat can only take one or two more LBer's in this class. I think uat likes Britt but has at least 3 to 4 LBers ahead of Britt. From reading the bol site anyways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aujeff11 6,243 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 The funny twist to this is that they say they will announce for the same school but on different days. Just kind of feels like a set-up. Will be pleasantly surprised to sign both! ;)/> Seemingly, one would think that a recruit would love for his choice to be just as unknown as the previous one so the guessing game can be played out among the fans.In this case, the recruit that commits first would be essentially announcing where the second guy is playing. That'seven assuming they pick the same school. According to B Matthews, they are planning on picking the same school. Planning being the operative word. Yes & I know. In the line of reporters reporting it BMatt is about 6th. My OP was that package deals never materializes the way we hoped they would materialize. In this case, I was saying if both recruits want a legitimate decision day, they are not going to be a package deal.So what's the problem? As far as I can tell, the only assumption that I'm making is that the two recruits want the decision day suspense and coverage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ellitor 33,062 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 (edited) The funny twist to this is that they say they will announce for the same school but on different days. Just kind of feels like a set-up. Will be pleasantly surprised to sign both! ;)/> Seemingly, one would think that a recruit would love for his choice to be just as unknown as the previous one so the guessing game can be played out among the fans.In this case, the recruit that commits first would be essentially announcing where the second guy is playing. That'seven assuming they pick the same school. According to B Matthews, they are planning on picking the same school. Planning being the operative word. Yes & I know. In the line of reporters reporting it BMatt is about 6th. My OP was that package deals never materializes the way we hoped they would materialize. In this case, I was saying if both recruits want a legitimate decision day, they are not going to be a package deal.So what's the problem? As far as I can tell, the only assumption that I'm making is that the two recruits want the decision day suspense and coverage. Lol. No problem I was just pointing out there were 5 other reporters who publicly said what BMatt did before BMatt so I thought it was interesting you referenced BMatt. That's all.Speaking respectfully I don't see anything stated or implied in your OP about package deals not coming out the way they are wanted. That's why I as well as BCSI in post #43 both replied the way we did. You implied it later in your BMatt post clearly but we just did not see it in the OP. That could be our mistake. Either way, no worries. Edited March 23, 2016 by ellitor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aujeff11 6,243 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 The funny twist to this is that they say they will announce for the same school but on different days. Just kind of feels like a set-up. Will be pleasantly surprised to sign both! ;)/> Seemingly, one would think that a recruit would love for his choice to be just as unknown as the previous one so the guessing game can be played out among the fans.In this case, the recruit that commits first would be essentially announcing where the second guy is playing. That'seven assuming they pick the same school. According to B Matthews, they are planning on picking the same school. Planning being the operative word. Yes & I know. In the line of reporters reporting it BMatt is about 6th. My OP was that package deals never materializes the way we hoped they would materialize. In this case, I was saying if both recruits want a legitimate decision day, they are not going to be a package deal.So what's the problem? As far as I can tell, the only assumption that I'm making is that the two recruits want the decision day suspense and coverage. Lol. No problem I was just pointing out there were 5 other reporters who publicly said what BMatt did before BMatt so I thought it was interesting you referenced BMatt. That's all.Speaking respectfully I don't see anything stated or implied in your OP about package deals not coming out the way they are wanted. That's why I as well as BCSI in post #43 both replied the way we did. You implied it later in your BMatt post clearly but we just did not see it in the OP. That could be our mistake. Either way, no worries. Yesterday morning at 7:38 I said:"We will take both in a heartbeat. Why anybody even believes the package deal talk is ridiculous. That stuff never materializes out that way." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
augolf1716 21,093 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 Well OK then glad we got that settled Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now