Jump to content

Don't know if anyone noticed...


ClaytonAU

Recommended Posts

Gus relinquished all play calling duty to Rhett last night for the remainder of the season. Seems as if we crash and burn on offense Rhett will be the scapegoat. Thoughts? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites





  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

OK. How about the other side of it. If we do not crash and burn but instead light it up, then Rhett isn't a scapegoat, he's a good OC in the SEC!

(I put zero stock in the "Rhett's gonna be a scapegoat" stuff. These coaches and players are looking for W's, not for excuses is what I think.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Gus now has his scapegoat if the td's don't start showing up in mass quantities for AU. It seems likely that some coaching changes will be called for at year end as AU likely ends up 8-4 or 7-5 again based on what we've seen so far (obviously pure speculation) which simply ain't good enough.

Enter Briles who is still unlikely to be a hot commodity as a head coach so soon after the issues at Baylor. He and Gus like each other, Gus keeps his job, AU doesn't have to pay yet another "former head coach" to leave and admit they made a mistake extending his contract, the power brokers are appeased that better things are ahead now with Briles being on AU campus. Scapegoat is booted and everybody moves forward. The only one hosed is lashlee.  Scarbinsky's article today on the scapegoat theory doesn't seem so far fetched to me.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we stink on offense, indeed gives Malzahn a scapegoat, and we bring in a Briles.  If we light it up,  Rhett likely gets a HC job somewhere, and we bring in a Briles. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Say what you will, but last night was the first time all year I remember really playing with some pace on offense.  Yeah, we need to put some drives in the end zone, but overall the offense was much smoother (re: getting plays in, running fast, etc).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rhett has only been around Gus. He was basically trained by Gus. He's gonna call games like Gus. We shouldn't expect anything to change. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, doug3020 said:

Rhett has only been around Gus. He was basically trained by Gus. He's gonna call games like Gus. We shouldn't expect anything to change. 

 

Ya know how talented students can surpass the master? Let's wait and see if Rhett is a talented student.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CleCoTiger said:

 

Ya know how talented students can surpass the master? Let's wait and see if Rhett is a talented student.

Did I miss something when Gus lurched around all offseason saying he was gonna be "more involved" in the offense this year? Reading b/w the lines that would insinuate that Rhett was calling plays last year....I'm pretty sure we weren't setting offensive records (positively) last year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, doug3020 said:

Did I miss something when Gus lurched around all offseason saying he was gonna be "more involved" in the offense this year? Reading b/w the lines that would insinuate that Rhett was calling plays last year....I'm pretty sure we weren't setting offensive records (positively) last year. 

Rhett called the aTm game last season, a 26-10 win by our Tigers. Other than that, playcalling has been a two headed collaborative monster for the most part with Rhett telling Malzahn what he thought and Malzahn making the final call.

On edit...

For whatever reason, perhaps all the other responsibilities as a head coach getting in the way of study, Malzahn seems to have recognized that he (at least for now) has lost some mojo as a play caller. Whether it's that or outside pressure, what was being done wasn't working all that great against teams like Clemson and aTm so kudos to Gus for openly making the change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CleCoTiger said:

Rhett called the aTm game last season, a 26-10 win by our Tigers. Other than that, playcalling has been a two headed collaborative monster for the most part with Rhett telling Malzahn what he thought and Malzahn making the final call.

On edit...

For whatever reason, perhaps all the other responsibilities as a head coach getting in the way of study, Malzahn seems to have recognized that he (at least for now) has lost some mojo as a play caller. Whether it's that or outside pressure, what was being done wasn't working all that great against teams like Clemson and aTm so kudos to Gus for openly making the change.

I'll let you have your sunshine w Gus and Rhett. I'll happily eat crow if things change. We all want Auburn to win, bottom line. Read Stats upon further review concerning last nights play calling. WDE. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know who calls the plays and who doesn't but I thought the play calling was a little better last night,still could have been a lot better but we seemed to move the ball better at least between the 20's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully we'll have a new OC/QB coach next year. We sure need one. However, 6 FG's and no TD's won't cut it when we face Arkansas, Ole Miss, Miss. State and Alabama.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, doug3020 said:

I'll let you have your sunshine w Gus and Rhett. I'll happily eat crow if things change. We all want Auburn to win, bottom line. Read Stats upon further review concerning last nights play calling. WDE. 

I read Stat's post almost as soon as it went up. There are remaining issues to be sure, especially that 80+ percent run calls on first down that allow opposing D's to load up to stop the run on first down and be right 80+ percent of the time. Gotta make 'em pay. Maybe Rhett will learn to trust Sean and the receivers to do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CleCoTiger said:

I read Stat's post almost as soon as it went up. There are remaining issues to be sure, especially that 80+ percent run calls on first down that allow opposing D's to load up to stop the run on first down and be right 80+ percent of the time. Gotta make 'em pay. Maybe Rhett will learn to trust Sean and the receivers to do that.

Holding my breath.....

Edit: I have nothing against running the football on first down. I do have a problem with running the same freaking running play 80% of the time on first down. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scapegoat schmakegoat, I don't buy it from Scarbinsky or Jack Crowe. The simple fact is, RL makes $600K a year as the OC  and he should be able to run this offense. Gus shouldn't have to, he needs to run the entire program.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, IronMan70 said:

Scapegoat schmakegoat, I don't buy it from Scarbinsky or Jack Crowe. The simple fact is, RL makes $600K a year as the OC  and he should be able to run this offense. Gus shouldn't have to, he needs to run the entire program.

I need more likes so I can give you one! :)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, weagl1 said:

I think that is the first step towards Gus saving his own job as he brings in Art Briles as OC for 2017.  

I approve this message

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, CleCoTiger said:

I need more likes so I can give you one! :)

 

yep....agree....

I could be wrong but I don't believe Gus makes decisions about serous things to "save his job" or find a scapegoat.  That's what children do...not mature adults.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's just too much smoke for something not to have happened for Gus to just flip a switch and hand over the reigns to RL. Nuheisel (sp) tweets out Briles to Auburn earlier this week. Crowe sends out info yesterday morning. Gus makes it public last night. The LSU game was considered the biggest of Gus's career (job wise). Why all of a sudden completely put your job in someone else's hands when you've preached all offseason you needed to be more involved? I just don't see it adding up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scarbinsky's story (see that thread) would seem to potentially shed lots of light on this situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something doesn't sit well with me about this. Not that it's Rhett calling the shots, although I'd feel better if it was somebody who was more proven and had history backing them. But the fact that Gus worked his butt off for years proving to the world how great of a play caller he is and then AU pays him $4 million a year to NOT call the offense? The whole reason we hired him was his offense and his playcalling --that's what makes him worth $4 million/year, right? So we are stuck in a position where our best playcaller doesn't have time to get mentally prepared to call the plays. That seems counterproductive to me. I know it's how football staffs work but this is why there were segments of the board asking why we have someone so under-qualified as the head of our offense back when our staff was being filled out in 2012.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...