Jump to content

BLM reveal their true nature.


AURaptor

Recommended Posts





57 minutes ago, metafour said:

This is what your education system is pumping out these days.  Way to go cultural Marxists and socialists.

 

And at our ' elite ' levels of education, no less. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did some research into the video.  This is heavily edited footage from a college debate competition.  These students come from the University of West Georgia, and the event happened at Harvard.  The topic of the debate was on renewable energy, and instead of sticking to the topic, the students decided on taking a strategy called Kritik, which basically allows them to take any position that may or may not pertain to the topic at hand and leave it up to the other team to actually defeat their proposition.  If the other team fails to do that, they the lose debate.  

Do they believe in what they're saying and are they a part of the BLM movement?  Who knows.  You could argue that they decided to use this as a winning strategy in the debate (which probably largely depends on flustering the other team with the topic).  

I'm sure you guys will be happy to believe whatever you want on this.  Just trying to inject some facts in probably the wrong place to do it :P.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some citation would be helpful.  Sounds very far fetched, ... West GA students, up at Harvard, to debate renewable energy, but instead, going off on a pointless tangent about race and such ? :gofig: 

Possible, I suppose, but in light of the other bits of evidence concerning BLM, it does seem to fall strangely in sync with what they really believe. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, savorytiger said:

Did some research into the video.  This is heavily edited footage from a college debate competition.  These students come from the University of West Georgia, and the event happened at Harvard.  The topic of the debate was on renewable energy, and instead of sticking to the topic, the students decided on taking a strategy called Kritik, which basically allows them to take any position that may or may not pertain to the topic at hand and leave it up to the other team to actually defeat their proposition.  If the other team fails to do that, they the lose debate.  

Do they believe in what they're saying and are they a part of the BLM movement?  Who knows.  You could argue that they decided to use this as a winning strategy in the debate (which probably largely depends on flustering the other team with the topic).  

I'm sure you guys will be happy to believe whatever you want on this.  Just trying to inject some facts in probably the wrong place to do it :P.

If you want to "inject some facts" you may want to point out that these two have a long history of advocating the same asinine (and completely racist) militant BLM viewpoint; which kind of renders the whole "but it was just a debate" argument pretty irrelevant as it is obvious that these are indeed their REAL thoughts.  At what point do you open your eyes and realize that trying to spin all these terrorist BLM idiots as anything other than racist terrorists is not only beyond pathetic, but also incredibly frightening?

 

rEq1Ghl.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

" But.... that's CANADIAN BLM ?? "   Is that what we can expect to hear from the supporters of this nonsense ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...