TexasTiger 12,811 Posted September 16, 2017 Share Posted September 16, 2017 In bite sized tweets you may be able to understand: https://mobile.twitter.com/renato_mariotti/status/909046433931841537 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DKW 86 7,411 Posted September 16, 2017 Share Posted September 16, 2017 Quote That is huge news. It means that Mueller has concluded that specific foreign individuals committed a crime by making a "contribution" in connection with an election. It also means that he has evidence of that crime that convinced a federal magistrate judge of two things.First, that there was good reason to believe that the foreign individual committed the crime. Second, that evidence of the crime by making a contribution. on Facebook. Why is that big news? Until now, Mueller's efforts to obtain information about Russian interference in the e be seen as an effort to gain counterintelligence or to investigate a matter unlikely to result in charges. Now we know he believes that he's close to charging specific foreign people with a crime. Can he do that? Yes, if they committed a crime in the U.S. That is a landslide leap of faith and conjecture. It may or may not mean anything. Looking for evidence doesnt mean you find it. This guy doesnt "KNOW" why Mueller is doing anything. He especially is offering some extraordinary claims and leaps in logic. Lets quit all the mental masturbation and let it play out. This doesnt mean that anyone colluded anything about an election or that an election was hacked. So far ZERO evidence of that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaltyTiger 7,764 Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 On 9/16/2017 at 0:37 PM, TexasTiger said: In bite sized tweets you may be able to understand: https://mobile.twitter.com/renato_mariotti/status/909046433931841537 You once again reflect a mean spirit. Trying to insinuate that I am stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Proud Tiger 4,261 Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 46 minutes ago, SaltyTiger said: You once again reflect a mean spirit. Trying to insinuate that I am stupid. Just his normal MO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaltyTiger 7,764 Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 4 minutes ago, Proud Tiger said: Just his normal MO Thanks for the kind words PT....Stupid Lives Matter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasTiger 12,811 Posted September 19, 2017 Author Share Posted September 19, 2017 2 hours ago, SaltyTiger said: You once again reflect a mean spirit. Trying to insinuate that I am stupid. ❄️ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GiveEmElle 1,559 Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 On 9/16/2017 at 2:14 PM, DKW 86 said: That is a landslide leap of faith and conjecture. It may or may not mean anything. Looking for evidence doesnt mean you find it. This guy doesnt "KNOW" why Mueller is doing anything. He especially is offering some extraordinary claims and leaps in logic. Lets quit all the mental masturbation and let it play out. This doesnt mean that anyone colluded anything about an election or that an election was hacked. So far ZERO evidence of that. So Mueller is investigating a crime that there is zero evidence of happening? A FISA warrant was issued based on zero evidence? A home was raided based on zero evidence? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DKW 86 7,411 Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 29 minutes ago, GiveEmElle said: So Mueller is investigating a crime that there is zero evidence of happening? A FISA warrant was issued based on zero evidence? A home was raided based on zero evidence? Where did you get THAT idea from? I specifically stated that there was NO EVIDENCE of collusion. There is obviously evidence of money issues, investment issues, and maybe even perjury. Collusion? So far zilch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GiveEmElle 1,559 Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 2 hours ago, DKW 86 said: Where did you get THAT idea from? I specifically stated that there was NO EVIDENCE of collusion. There is obviously evidence of money issues, investment issues, and maybe even perjury. Collusion? So far zilch. Sounded like you were saying there was no evidence of collusion or election hacking. The FBI has clearly stated there is evidence of hacking and this current investigation is in regards to collusion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaltyTiger 7,764 Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 So Trump could be right http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/09/19/trump-vindicated-manafort-wiretap-report-could-boost-trumps-claim-after-months-media Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasTiger 12,811 Posted September 19, 2017 Author Share Posted September 19, 2017 22 minutes ago, SaltyTiger said: So Trump could be right http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/09/19/trump-vindicated-manafort-wiretap-report-could-boost-trumps-claim-after-months-media Man, you bend over backwards for this guy. http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2017/09/19/trump_obama_wiretapping_accusations_not_vindicated_by_manafort_news.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DKW 86 7,411 Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 3 hours ago, GiveEmElle said: Sounded like you were saying there was no evidence of collusion or election hacking. The FBI has clearly stated there is evidence of hacking and this current investigation is in regards to collusion. There isnt...so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homersapien 11,354 Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 7 minutes ago, DKW 86 said: There isnt...so far. Well, actually we don't know that. Mueller doesn't provide updates on what he has. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaltyTiger 7,764 Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 1 hour ago, TexasTiger said: Man, you bend over backwards for this guy. http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2017/09/19/trump_obama_wiretapping_accusations_not_vindicated_by_manafort_news.html I am not bending backwards for anyone Tex...simply read the articles Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasTiger 12,811 Posted September 19, 2017 Author Share Posted September 19, 2017 6 minutes ago, SaltyTiger said: I am not bending backwards for anyone Tex...simply read the articles BS. You posted and said he could be right. Keep grasping at straws. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DKW 86 7,411 Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 Mueller is off chasing some very questionable financial transactions. Collusion and Hacking, he has moved on from. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/06/technology/facebook-russian-political-ads.html?mcubz=0 Quote The revelations can only add to the political skirmishing in Washington over Russia’s role in the election. Mr. Trump has often dismissed the Russian hacking story as “fake news” and bristled at any implication that Mr. Putin had helped him win. To date, while news reports have uncovered many meetings and contacts between Trump associates and Russians, there has been no evidence proving collusion in the hacking or other Russian activities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaltyTiger 7,764 Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 28 minutes ago, TexasTiger said: BS. You posted and said he could be right. Keep grasping at straws. grasping at straws??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasTiger 12,811 Posted September 19, 2017 Author Share Posted September 19, 2017 22 minutes ago, SaltyTiger said: grasping at straws??? Looking for evidence Trump's not an erratic, unhinged liar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaltyTiger 7,764 Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 3 minutes ago, TexasTiger said: Looking for evidence Trump's not an erratic, unhinged liar. Doing nothing of the sort and you know it Tex. Simply made a statement and you went off on me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasTiger 12,811 Posted September 19, 2017 Author Share Posted September 19, 2017 17 minutes ago, SaltyTiger said: Doing nothing of the sort and you know it Tex. Simply made a statement and you went off on me. You could work for Kellyanne. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaltyTiger 7,764 Posted September 19, 2017 Share Posted September 19, 2017 22 minutes ago, TexasTiger said: You could work for Kellyanne. Maybe Trumps 2nd term I will consider doing that, only if the Mueller investigation is over though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasTiger 12,811 Posted September 19, 2017 Author Share Posted September 19, 2017 3 hours ago, SaltyTiger said: Maybe Trumps 2nd term I will consider doing that, only if the Mueller investigation is over though. War Eagle, Salty! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GiveEmElle 1,559 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 On 9/19/2017 at 0:32 PM, DKW 86 said: There isnt...so far. So the FBI is wrong? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DKW 86 7,411 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 FBI has never said they had proof collusion nor "election hacking." The FBI has said that there may be money issues dealing with Manaforte, BUT no one has indicted nor arrested him for anything so far even though the wiretap etc has been ongoing since 2015 or so. I am going to say this for the umpteenth time. As of now, there is no proof of anything. The VIPS report pretty soundly scientifically debunked the BS hacking allegations. Collusion? Nothing so far. Money laundering etc: We will see. The FBI et all have been chasing that case for quite some time now and so far....nothing. That could change tomorrow tho. Hacking and Colluding? I think that is pretty soundly been debunked by VIPS. They are scientifically, soundly, professionally showing us that the allegations make ZERO sense versus the real evidence. Its been over a year now? Why hasnt anyone in law enforcement seen the server yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaltyTiger 7,764 Posted September 24, 2017 Share Posted September 24, 2017 5 hours ago, DKW 86 said: FBI has never said they had proof collusion nor "election hacking." The FBI has said that there may be money issues dealing with Manaforte, BUT no one has indicted nor arrested him for anything so far even though the wiretap etc has been ongoing since 2015 or so. I am going to say this for the umpteenth time. As of now, there is no proof of anything. The VIPS report pretty soundly scientifically debunked the BS hacking allegations. Collusion? Nothing so far. Money laundering etc: We will see. The FBI et all have been chasing that case for quite some time now and so far....nothing. That could change tomorrow tho. Hacking and Colluding? I think that is pretty soundly been debunked by VIPS. They are scientifically, soundly, professionally showing us that the allegations make ZERO sense versus the real evidence. Its been over a year now? Why hasnt anyone in law enforcement seen the server yet? DKW, please be a bit less point blank ....this type of information upsets Elle, Homer, and Tex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.