Sign in to follow this  
tigerbrotha12

No names missing from official roster

Recommended Posts





Encouraging, but I am sure the law firm Auburn hired told them to leave them on for now as it could be construed as admission of guilt.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I want to be encouraged by this. 

I wonder if the NCAA is going to fast track any decisions on the current known players who are implicated in this conundrum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, AUTigersfan89 said:

I want to be encouraged by this. 

I wonder if the NCAA is going to fast track any decisions on the current known players who are implicated in this conundrum.

I don't think fast track is their vocabulary. They are one of the only entities in this country that manages to be slower than our government.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, wdefromtx said:

I don't think fast track is their vocabulary. They are one of the only entities in this country that manages to be slower than our government.

The one thing that we have on our side is that we are not alone and are gathering associates every day with all of this mess

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 2 players might have to repay, miss some games, but still be on team potentially.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Hopsing said:

The 2 players might have to repay, miss some games, but still be on team potentially.

That would be a gift from the heavens at this point

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, au_bsci_04 said:

Would it?

Who knows.....could be rolling the dice on being called for playing ineligible players if something develops over the next few months. Technically I guess one could say that AU has been "warned" about possibility of problems.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was assuming, in this hypothetical,  the penalty would be to give the money back - like the Bama players and they didn't lose their eligibility, right? That's how I understand it but could be off. I'll admit I'm not up to speed on how all of this works. Did the Bama guys not play in any games between getting money and paying it back? Could our guys potentially have this as the punishment? 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Tiger said:

I was assuming, in this hypothetical,  the penalty would be to give the money back - like the Bama players and they didn't lose their eligibility, right? That's how I understand it but could be off. I'll admit I'm not up to speed on how all of this works. Did the Bama guys not play in any games between getting money and paying it back? Could our guys potentially have this as the punishment? 

long ways to go but I think AU has the bases covered at least I hope so. It really doesn't matter cause AU has got to get a grip on the AD department

  • Like 2
  • Love 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this