Jump to content

‘The guy’s a f—ing yenta’: Trump’s loose lips draw fire


Recommended Posts





40 minutes ago, homersapien said:

Even President Donald Trump's supporters concede he can't keep a secret.

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/06/01/trump-secrets-white-house-security-leaks-617961

And the clown show continues....

 

What is the big deal about a silly jobs report Brother Homer? We idiots do not need President Trump nor Barry leaking that info. Open your eyes and see how well things are clicking.

Just days before his controversial Friday tweet hinting that an upcoming monthly jobs report would be favorable,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Had no idea Trump was a Jewish woman  he/she is more of a shadchan. I do love Fiddler On The Roof..............couldn't resist

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, homersapien said:

Even President Donald Trump's supporters concede he can't keep a secret.

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/06/01/trump-secrets-white-house-security-leaks-617961

And the clown show continues....

 

Indeed it does, but for the record, we are speaking about separate issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, augolf1716 said:

Had no idea Trump was a Jewish woman  he/she is more of a shadchan. I do love Fiddler On The Roof..............couldn't resist

 

Excuse me here, but Trump would be a shiksa?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, AUFAN78 said:

Indeed it does, but for the record, we are speaking about separate issues.

I am speaking about the POTUS disclosing information prematurely, which has the potential of moving markets.  It's an affront to proper process and opens the door to corruption and/or loss of confidence in free markets.

Don't know what you are talking about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, SaltyTiger said:

What is the big deal about a silly jobs report Brother Homer? We idiots do not need President Trump nor Barry leaking that info. Open your eyes and see how well things are clicking.

Just days before his controversial Friday tweet hinting that an upcoming monthly jobs report would be favorable,

Didn't read the article did you? You missed the point. Completely.

"But after the tweet appeared to move the stock markets, it drew rebukes from former U.S. officials in both parties who stressed that rules preventing disclosure of jobs numbers are crucial to preventing insider trading and maintaining the stock market’s integrity."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, homersapien said:

I am speaking about the POTUS disclosing information prematurely, which has the potential of moving markets.  It's an affront to proper process and opens the door to corruption and/or loss of confidence in free markets.

Don't know what you are talking about.

I was speaking to the bitch, moan and whine clown show. You know, the butthurt one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, AUFAN78 said:

I was speaking to the bitch, moan and whine clown show. You know, the butthurt one. 

So, nothing about actual substance.

Let's try this:

Do you think it's acceptable for the POTUS to play loose with such confidential information - confidential for a good reason - simply to brag or hype himself?

Do you simply reject the following as being false or unfounded?

"But after the tweet appeared to move the stock markets, it drew rebukes from former U.S. officials in both parties who stressed that rules preventing disclosure of jobs numbers are crucial to preventing insider trading and maintaining the stock market’s integrity." 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/1/2018 at 9:19 PM, SaltyTiger said:

What is the big deal about a silly jobs report Brother Homer? We idiots do not need President Trump nor Barry leaking that info. Open your eyes and see how well things are clicking.

Just days before his controversial Friday tweet hinting that an upcoming monthly jobs report would be favorable,

" rules preventing disclosure of jobs numbers are crucial to preventing insider trading and maintaining the stock market’s integrity." 

That's the "big deal". 

If you don't get that, you'd apparently be OK with financial oligarchs trading on inside information - coming from the POTUS, no less. 

Is that what you'd call a free market?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, homersapien said:

So, nothing about actual substance.

Let's try this:

Do you think it's acceptable for the POTUS to play loose with such confidential information - confidential for a good reason - simply to brag or hype himself?

Do you simply reject the following as being false or unfounded?

"But after the tweet appeared to move the stock markets, it drew rebukes from former U.S. officials in both parties who stressed that rules preventing disclosure of jobs numbers are crucial to preventing insider trading and maintaining the stock market’s integrity." 

 

Exactly. I was eluding to your and and handful of others constant drivel.  In your words, "nothing of actual substance."  I think you nailed it. Thanks!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, AUFAN78 said:

Exactly. I was eluding to your and and handful of others constant drivel.  In your words, "nothing of actual substance."  I think you nailed it. Thanks!  

Linking an article is "drivel"?  This topic is "drivel"?

Denial is a comfortable place, huh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, homersapien said:

Linking an article is "drivel"?  This topic is "drivel"?

Denial is a comfortable place, huh?

Drivel is drivel. Linked by partisan source for political gain even more so don't ya think? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, AUFAN78 said:

Drivel is drivel. Linked by partisan source for political gain even more so don't ya think? 

Are you implying a) it didn't happen or  b) it happened, but it doesn't matter?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, homersapien said:

Are you implying a) it didn't happen or  b) it happened, but it doesn't matter?

 

It likely only matters to a partisan crowd. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, AUFAN78 said:

It likely only matters to a partisan crowd. 

Didn't read the piece?  There are a lot of Republicans upset by this, for the obvious reasons. 

You seem to fit Trumps definition of 'loyal' - mindless support.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...