Congressman Ellison Accused

[AUDub 11,136]

24 minutes ago, Proud Tiger said:

It is refreshing to see that others see that. But they don't care. Their egos and presumed self superiority are incurable. It is what it is.

So why do we keep this guy around again? Mental drain on the forum.

[HVAU 673]

41 minutes ago, AUDub said:

So why do we keep this guy around again? Mental drain on the forum.

This seems apropos...

 

[CCTAU 3,294]

21 pages on the Kavanaugh thread with not ONE piece of evidence!

Only three pages for Ellison with a LOT of evidence. (Possibly a video)

This pretty much sums up the feigned outrage!

[AUDub 11,136]

12 minutes ago, CCTAU said:

21 pages on the Kavanaugh thread with not ONE piece of evidence!

Only three pages for Ellison with a LOT of evidence. (Possibly a video)

This pretty much sums up the feigned outrage!

Ellison has very few defenders, and if she releases the evidence she claims she has, he'll have none. 

Plus, we're talking about a guy running for state AG vs a SCOTUS appointment. Is it any wonder one gets more attention than the other? 

[TexasTiger 12,827]

4 minutes ago, AUDub said:

Ellison has very few defenders, and if she releases the evidence she claims she has, he'll have none. 

Plus, we're talking about a guy running for state AG vs a SCOTUS appointment. Is it any wonder one gets more attention than the other? 

He’s looking for “outrage” not rationality.

[Proud Tiger 4,261]

52 minutes ago, CCTAU said:

21 pages on the Kavanaugh thread with not ONE piece of evidence!

Only three pages for Ellison with a LOT of evidence. (Possibly a video)

This pretty much sums up the feigned outrage!

Yep you see whole lot of rationalization, hypocrisy and patting self on the back . For example, they jump on the news of a committee staffer being excused because of a previous charge but think it's OK for Booker and Brown to actually vote. I guess it boosts their inflated opinion of themselves.

[homersapien 11,357]

8 minutes ago, Proud Tiger said:

Yep you see whole lot of rationalization, hypocrisy and patting self on the back . For example, they jump on the news of a committee staffer being excused because of a previous charge but think it's OK for Booker and Brown to actually vote.

Using your standard and considering his record, it would be unacceptable for someone like Trump to be making a nomination to the SCOTUS in the first place.