Sessions out!

[TexasTiger 12,800]

12 hours ago, Mikey said:

When will someone from the Trump team be indicted for colluding with Russians during the election process?

Back on point, I've been disappointed in Trump's relations with Jeff Sessions. Sessions backed Trump from the very beginning and stayed loyal. If Trump runs again, I'll vote for him again because the Dems will nominate some left-wing idiot, but I don't like the way Sessions was treated.

Soon. Roger Stone.

 

12 hours ago, AU64 said:

But where is the collusion between DT with Russia?  Isn't that the purpose of the inquiry....not to punish DTs friends for non-political misdeeds.

We’ll see. They’re probably connected. Follow the money. Of course, cultists don’t want fellow cult members held accountable, even when they’re criminals.

[TexasTiger 12,800]

[homersapien 11,352]

23 hours ago, SaltyTiger said:

Trump will be in his second term by then.

Gonna build on that huge popular vote advantage, huh?

[AU64 10,122]

1 hour ago, TexasTiger said:

 We’ll see. They’re probably connected. Follow the money. Of course, cultists don’t want fellow cult members held accountable, even when they’re criminals.

Probably connected?    Based on what?  Speculation is the basis for an investigation?  ....been looking going on two year and have virtually blackmailed some guys to get them to turn on DT ….apparently without results.

If they want to chase crooks...go to it but don't stop at DT....how about turning their guns on the NJ Senator and the FOB group.  Lots of them out there....but dem cultists can't abide  the fact that some of their favorites are covered with slime.    So worry about the cost of the first lady's hotel room but no concerns over the dozens/ hundreds people on Mueller's unbudgeted snipe hunt. 

[TexasTiger 12,800]

13 minutes ago, AU64 said:

Probably connected?    Based on what?  Speculation is the basis for an investigation?  ....been looking going on two year and have virtually blackmailed some guys to get them to turn on DT ….apparently without results.

If they want to chase crooks...go to it but don't stop at DT....how about turning their guns on the NJ Senator and the FOB group.  Lots of them out there....but dem cultists can't abide  the fact that some of their favorites are covered with slime.    So worry about the cost of the first lady's hotel room but no concerns over the dozens/ hundreds people on Mueller's unbudgeted snipe hunt. 

You’re doing the speculation. Mueller will find what he finds. Relax, Francis.

[Mikey 16,545]

2 hours ago, homersapien said:

Gonna build on that huge popular vote advantage, huh?

Popular vote doesn't matter. Let New York and California each add 10 million new voters. Thanks to the wisdom of the founding fathers, it won't make a tiny bit of difference when the electoral votes are tallied on Election Night.

[homersapien 11,352]

9 hours ago, Mikey said:

Popular vote doesn't matter. Let New York and California each add 10 million new voters. Thanks to the wisdom of the founding fathers, it won't make a tiny bit of difference when the electoral votes are tallied on Election Night.

The electoral college is an archaic vestige and is holding the country back.  It's fundamentally undemocratic.

[Brad_ATX 13,654]

11 hours ago, Mikey said:

Popular vote doesn't matter. Let New York and California each add 10 million new voters. Thanks to the wisdom of the founding fathers, it won't make a tiny bit of difference when the electoral votes are tallied on Election Night.

Well it actually would in the long run.  If they add that many new voters without a population increase, then they would get more representatives and thus electoral votes after the next census is taken.  Remember, the number of electoral votes in a state are re-appropriated every 10 years.  So the map could be a bit different in 2024.