ValleyTiger 2,894 Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 So the jist is they have a computer model that rates every cfb player 0-100 based on their impact on the game. Article Link Marlon made the list of top returning players from 2018 where they graded him a 97. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kennypowers 1,431 Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 Interesting. Ratings seem to be all over the place for drafted players. They kind of lost me at Ole Miss rating 90 at #5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Win4AU 4,044 Posted August 20, 2019 Share Posted August 20, 2019 I watched Marcello’s sim of the Oregon game on NCAA 14 with updated roster. Take it for what it is but Gatewood looked awesome. It primarily had him and Nix running a lot of reads. Boobie was also unstoppable until he was injured in Nix’s game. Nix wasn’t given a lot of throws other than screens but had a TD pass to Sal and an int to seal the game. Defense looked really good. Like I said take it for what it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aubiefifty 16,624 Posted August 20, 2019 Share Posted August 20, 2019 14 hours ago, Win4AU said: I watched Marcello’s sim of the Oregon game on NCAA 14 with updated roster. Take it for what it is but Gatewood looked awesome. It primarily had him and Nix running a lot of reads. Boobie was also unstoppable until he was injured in Nix’s game. Nix wasn’t given a lot of throws other than screens but had a TD pass to Sal and an int to seal the game. Defense looked really good. Like I said take it for what it is. got a link to that? i hate being a pain but i would love to watch some of that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Win4AU 4,044 Posted August 20, 2019 Share Posted August 20, 2019 I have not watched the 3rd one with Nix and Kmart starting in the backfield. Apparently it’s a barn burner. Other notes Schwartz and Oregon’s three injured WRs are included in the sim. Enjoy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dual-Threat Rigby 8,574 Posted August 20, 2019 Share Posted August 20, 2019 maybe the current year of adoption will lend to a more accurate model bc Ole Miss just shouldnt be that high based on any metric Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dyehardfanAU 2,117 Posted August 20, 2019 Share Posted August 20, 2019 Does anyone actually believe these Playstation rankings and simulations have any bearing on reality? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ValleyTiger 2,894 Posted August 20, 2019 Author Share Posted August 20, 2019 19 minutes ago, dyehardfanAU said: Does anyone actually believe these Playstation rankings and simulations have any bearing on reality? The simulations no, but the rankings mentioned in the OP article are based on real world performance metrics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dyehardfanAU 2,117 Posted August 20, 2019 Share Posted August 20, 2019 1 hour ago, ValleyTiger said: The simulations no, but the rankings mentioned in the OP article are based on real world performance metrics. Interesting. Have a link to that? I'd be interested in reading up on their methodology. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ValleyTiger 2,894 Posted August 20, 2019 Author Share Posted August 20, 2019 1 minute ago, dyehardfanAU said: Interesting. Have a link to that? I'd be interested in reading up on their methodology. Um.... yeah, the link is in the first post of this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.