Jump to content


Null



Sign in to follow this  
homersapien

How Bill Barr is advancing Trump’s quest to become "president for life"

Recommended Posts

What the corrupt "Injustice Department’s" move to drop the case against Michael Flynn really means

https://www.salon.com/2020/05/13/how-bill-barr-is-advancing-trumps-quest-to-become-president-for-life_partner/

 

 

A Trump lackey took a major step Thursday toward establishing a Trump dictatorship.

The Justice Department moved to drop the criminal case against confessed felon Michael Flynn. He's the retired Army general and secret foreign agent who was Trump's first national security adviser.

An extraordinary court filing demonstrated that Trump has one standard of justice for his enemies and an entirely different one for his allies. The court action shows how fully Trump has turned our Justice Department into his personal protection agency. Goodbye equal justice under the law.

The 108-page filing is rife with falsehoods and tortured interpretations of established facts. Such is a mendacious necessity since Flynn twice confessed to multiple crimes under oath in open court. It argues the lies Flynn told FBI agents were not "material" to the case against him. The trial court judge already has dismissed that as nonsense.

It also argues that there was no legitimate reason ever existed to investigate Flynn. That is astonishing since Flynn was secretly a well-paid agent of foreign interests while serving as Trump's national security adviser. The claim is all the more remarkable because it is made by an ostensibly Republican administration. Didn't Republican clamor for decades about Russian spies and influence peddling?

Based on all this and more we can now reasonably refer to Trump's Injustice Department.

Trump could have pardoned Flynn. "He was an innocent man," Trump said in a bald-faced lie in front of video cameras Thursday afternoon. "I'm very happy for General Flynn."

But a pardon would not have allowed Trump to mark his territory, signaling to any who dare challenge his assertions that he is above the law.

 

From president to dictator

By demonstrating unfettered control over our Justice Department, Trump has achieved a critical step required for a transition from a president with limited authority to de facto dictator.

The motion to drop the Flynn case fits Trump's fact-free declaration last summer. "I have an Article II," he said, "where I have to the right to do whatever I want as president."

Our Constitution allows no such thing. You might think that Trump, who has been saying since 1987 that he should be president, would have read Article II. It is only 1,023 words. Either he never read Article II or he doesn't care about the limits it places on him. One example is the requirement that he "shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed."

Attorney General William Barr—better and properly called Attorney Specific to Trump—lacks unilateral power to dismiss the case against Flynn. Dismissal requires court approval under Rule 48(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Admitted his crimes

Eminent lawyers stood beside Flynn when he confessed twice in open court to felonies. He allocated to crimes for which charges were dropped in a plea deal. Given this robust record of criminality, the Injustice Department's action raises obvious questions:

  • Will Republican senators, notably lawyers Mitch McConnell, Lindsey Graham, Lamar Alexander and Ted Cruz, at long last stand up for the rule of law.? Or will they continue as moral jellyfish – blind, spineless and floating aimlessly in the waves of chaos and corruption flowing from the Trump White House?
  • Will Speaker Nancy Pelosi authorize House investigative hearings into Trump violating his oath to "faithfully execute" the duties of his office and endangering our national security?
  • If Trump persists with his refusal to cooperate with all House investigations, will Pelosi exercise the House's Constitutional power to arrest recalcitrant witnesses? That includes Barr. If appropriate, try them and upon conviction incarcerate them for contempt of Congress and other crimes.
  • Will Joe Biden pledge that if elected his Justice Department will pursue fully the Russian connections to Trump and his campaign? We need to find out why Team Trump has worked so diligently to hide the truth.

Justice Department turmoil

The court filing follows what must have been a ferocious, months-long fight inside Barr's Injustice Department. Some career prosecutors resigned from the case earlier to avoid sullying their reputations.

Timothy Shea, a Barr protégé installed three months ago as acting U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, signed the motion. K

Missing from the latest court papers were the signatures of Jocelyn Ballentine, an assistant prosecutor, and Brandon Van Grack, a veteran espionage case prosecutor. Van Grack resigned from the case in a one-sentence filing just moments before the motion to dismiss was submitted to Judge Emmet G. Sullivan of U.S. District Court.

Judge Sullivan can order Justice and its lawyers to explain these unusual actions. He could refuse to allow the case to be dropped or allow it, but with leave to refile the charges in the future. That would make Flynn vulnerable if Trump does not get a second term.

On Putin's payroll

Flynn and his company were on Putin's payroll and worked for Turkish interests with deep ties to the Kremlin. Flynn was paid at least $680,000, some of which he lied about. At the time he was the president elect's designated national security adviser.

Judge Sullivan has  told Flynn "arguably you sold out your country." Trump, on Thursday, called Flynn "a hero."

"All along, you were an unregistered agent of a foreign country while serving as the national security advisor to the president of the United States," Sullivan told Flynn.  "That undermines everything this flag over here stands for."

"This is a very serious offense… A high ranking senior official of the government making false statements to the Federal Bureau of Investigation while in the White House, very serious crime."

That the Trump administration would shield a secret foreign agent who was the White House intelligence chief shows how important it is to Trump that he keep Flynn in his fold. Flynn made himself susceptible to blackmail by taking Russian money and lying about it, but it is not known if Flynn engaged in unquestionably traitorous conduct.

More Kremlin connections

The Flynn case has its roots in Russian interference to help Trump win the 2016 election. So do other allies. Among these are the felony prosecutions of Roger Stone, Trump's dirty tricks specialist, and campaign Manager Paul Manafort, a longtime foreign agent for dictators and Russian-speaking criminals and politicians.

Trump denies the Russians helped him become president. But America's intelligence agencies, the bi-partisan chairs of the Senate Intelligence Committee, the 418-page Mueller report and emails from none other than Donald Trump Jr. all make clear the Kremlin helped Trump defeat Hillary Clinton. The only issue on which the facts are not complete was whether Trump was a passive beneficiary or he knowingly worked with the Kremlin, whether obliquely or hand-in-glove.

The president's eldest son was told in writing in June 2016 that the Kremlin wanted to help his father become president. Trump Jr. replied enthusiastically "love it" and then met at Trump Tower with Kremlin agents. The son then lied and denied, telling both Fox News and ABC News that no such contact took place. More than a year later, as The New York Times was about to expose these lies, the namesake son released the damning emails.

Economic collapse and riots

Trump has openly talked six times about being president for life. When criticized for such assaults on American Constitutional principles, Trump lamely claimed he was joking. He also said last June that he anticipates that after completing the maximum of two terms his supporters will "demand that I stay longer."

Trump campaigned on a promise to destroy our government, an issue that has disappeared from the news after getting almost no attention during his campaign.

"Country goes to total hell"

That promise came after Trump told Fox News in 2014 how to get rid of the Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare. "When the economy crashes, when the country goes to total hell and everything is a disaster… you'll have riots to go back to where we used to be when we were great," he said.

On Wednesday, as the COVID-19 pandemic death toll surpassed 75,000 Americans he renewed his demand for the law to be undone. Repeal would leave at least 20 million Americans with no health insurance.

Just weeks after assuming office Trump held an unannounced meeting in the Oval Office with Russia's foreign minister and Russian ambassador and a "photographer" for the Kremlin-owned Tass news agency. The Russians revealed the meeting. They also disclosed that Trump gave them "sources and methods" intelligence, which is closely guarded to protect human and technological assets.

Trump places trust in Putin

In 2018 in Helsinki Trump declared that he trusts Putin fully, but not America's intelligence agencies.

Trump has met alone with Putin and Putin subordinates through his presidency. He ripped up the notes of his translator after one meeting, a crime under federal law. He met alone with Putin for at least one lengthy conversation using Putin's interpreter.

These actions demonstrate Trump's disloyalty and unfitness to be president, yet Senate Republicans refused to hear testimony after the House impeached him last year. Senate Republicans then voted twice not to convict except for one vote by the 2012 Republican presidential nominee, Mitt Romney, now the junior senator from Utah.

This latest abuse of power to protect a criminal crony who was on Vladimir Putin's payroll and a secret foreign agent is more than an impeachable offense. Trump, Barr and Shea also sent a clear message: Team Trump harbors no regard for the rule of law, the foundation of our liberties and democratic freedoms.

 

David Cay Johnston

 

 

  • Facepalm 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




17 minutes ago, wdefromtx said:

lol 

You gotta admit though that it is worrisome. Judge Sullivan is thankfully not backing down though. Flynn very much deserves to be punished for his crimes. 

Edited by AUDub
  • Like 2
  • Dislike 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, AUDub said:

You gotta admit though that it is worrisome. Judge Sullivan is thankfully not backing down though. Flynn very much deserves to be punished for his crimes. 

image.jpeg

wdefromtx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, AUDub said:

You gotta admit though that it is worrisome. Judge Sullivan is thankfully not backing down though. Flynn very much deserves to be punished for his crimes. 

There’s a lot about Flynn that wreaks, but Homey’s title for the thread. Lol 

 

If people are really worried that Trump is trying to become president for life....they need to step away from the Koolaid. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, wdefromtx said:

There’s a lot about Flynn that wreaks, but Homey’s title for the thread. Lol 

 

If people are really worried that Trump is trying to become president for life....they need to step away from the Koolaid. 

“The condition upon which God hath given liberty to man is eternal vigilance” - Thomas Jefferson

 

“Then, I have an Article II, where I have to the right to do whatever I want as president,” he said. “But I don’t even talk about that.”   - Donald Trump

Edited by homersapien

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, homersapien said:

“The condition upon which God hath given liberty to man is eternal vigilance” - Thomas Jefferson

 

“Then, I have an Article II, where I have to the right to do whatever I want as president,” he said. “But I don’t even talk about that.”   - Donald Trump

What’s your point? Trying to compare the two together? I think most people know that Trump can’t hold a candle to Jefferson. 

Edited by wdefromtx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(And it wasn't my title for the article, it was the author's.)

But the author makes an excellent point:  the first step for any given president to co-opt the office is to gain control of the Department of Justice.

That's my point.

Edited by homersapien

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My bad...you quoted the Salon....lmao 

 

Keep buying into that koolaid. He isn’t trying to become president for life. lol 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, wdefromtx said:

My bad...you quoted the Salon....lmao 

 

Keep buying into that koolaid. He isn’t trying to become president for life. lol 

He's certainly co-opted the Justice Department, which is the first step.

And as far as I know, you've said nothing that indicates you are opposed to that. (Speaking of koolaid.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, homersapien said:

He's certainly co-opted the Justice Department, which is the first step.

And as far as I know, you've said nothing that indicates you are opposed to that. (Speaking of koolaid.)

Actually, have more faith in all of our checks and balances than you do apparently. So if that’s koolaid, I’ll keep drinking that. 

  • Facepalm 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am still trying to figure out if the article is supposed to be serious - dictator for life. And we are STILL on the Russia collusion thing?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, homersapien said:

He's certainly co-opted the Justice Department, which is the first step.

So Trump has co-opted the Justice Department?  I guess Obama didn't co-opt the Justice Department by spying on American citizens and initiating a "counter intelligence" investigation with zero evidence?  The recently declassified testimony from all of the Obama Intelligence officials (all of them) said they had or saw no evidence of the Trump campaign working with anyone from Russia or anywhere else.  If they saw no evidence, why did they start the investigation?

 I can see Mueller on the first day he walked into his office and called all of his partisan investigators into the conference room and said....this thing has been under investigation by the FBI, CIA, DIA and every other 3 letter agency in DC, where is all the evidence?  I'm sure he was shocked at the sound of silence!

Luckily there is a guy out of Connecticut that is investigating all of this.  Hopefully Justice will be served!!

  • Like 3
  • Facepalm 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For someone that spends a lot of time saying that Trump is so dumb and such, sure is giving him a lot of credit thinking he has figured out how to takeover the presidency and turn it into a lifetime appointment. Out of all the presidents Trump figured it out. Lol 

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We need to prepare for the possibility of Trump rejecting election results

May 14, 2020 at 4:48 p.m. EDT

Since 2017, so many events in U.S. politics that were previously unthinkable have come to pass. Don’t believe me? A few days ago, the president of the United States baselessly accused a cable television host of murder and it barely made a blip in the news cycle. The shocking has become unsurprising — almost routine — under Donald Trump’s unhinged presidency.

We don’t know whether Trump will be reelected. But, as we head toward November, you have to ask yourself: If he loses, would it be more surprising if Trump graciously accepts defeat and congratulates his opponent or if he claimed to be the victim of a rigged election and a “deep state” plot?

The answer seems clear.

I’ve studied genuinely rigged elections across the globe. The tactics, context and strategies vary enormously from Azerbaijan to Zimbabwe. But one trait they have in common is this: The winner doesn’t claim they were rigged.

Not so with Trump. In 2016, when he narrowly defeated Hillary Clinton despite losing the popular vote by a historic margin, he claimed that 3 million to 5 million people voted illegally. That is a lie. But it raised an obvious question: If Trump claimed that an election he won was rigged, what will he do with an election he loses?

Already, he has insinuated that Democratic victories are the result of rigged elections. It’s part of a deliberate strategy to discredit the legitimacy of his political opponents, but it also endangers the peaceful transfer of power, which is a cornerstone of democratic government.

It’s worth reiterating that Trump’s claims are lies. The evidence is clear. Voter fraud is an minuscule problem in the United States. One comprehensive study found 31 cases of voter fraud of more than 1 billion ballots cast from 2000 to 2014, a rate of 0.0000031 percent of all votes. And lest you think that study was somehow biased against Republican claims, George W. Bush’s Justice Department went looking for voter fraud and basically came up empty. Indeed, as Lorraine Minnite, a political science professor at Rutgers University has noted, in 2005, more people were charged with violating migratory-bird statutes than voter fraud. And that was while Bush’s administration was actively seeking fraud cases to prosecute.

Edited by homersapien

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, homersapien said:

What will happen if Trump loses and then takes to Twitter to say he actually won? It’s not hard to see how deadly that could become,

Just remember that the police, military, and bikers are on his side Brother Homer. Recall how frightened you were when he mentioned those damn bikers? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Grumps said:

You're just trolling now!!!😃

Now....I think he’s been doing that for awhile. Lol 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, SaltyTiger said:

Just remember that the police, military, and bikers are on his side Brother Homer. Recall how frightened you were when he mentioned those damn bikers? 

I am one of those damn bikers, ass hole.

Idiots don't frighten me.  Fools like you do.

Edited by homersapien

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, homersapien said:

(You forgot the lol)

I guess you don't know your emoji's very well. 

  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, Grumps said:

I am still trying to figure out if the article is supposed to be serious - dictator for life. And we are STILL on the Russia collusion thing?

I was thinking something like "Emperor for Life" would be a more appropriate title. Maybe even add "Extraordinaire" at the end.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...