Marxist BLM Co-Founder goes on Multi-Million Dollar Real Estate Binge

[metafour 4,969]

You literally can't make this sh*t up. Surprise, leftists! All of your "social justice" icons  are really just grifters and conmen. Anyone with any knowledge of history knows that Marxism/Communism (aka "Socialism") is just a front for the "revolutionaries" to amass wealth through theft, without any actual merit.

Hence why in every single Marxist society throughout history the elite and their inner circle live like Kings and Queens, while the "common man" is equal...in destitute.

 

So what did BLM accomplish? They sparked riots all across the country in impoverished black neighbourhoods that resulted in BLACK-OWNED businesses being looted and destroyed. Property taxes in these cities and neighborhoods of course shot through the roof, and businesses and jobs fled. They defunded the police which has caused catastrophic increase in murder, and basically every form of crime imaginable in areas of the country predominantly comprised of black Americans and immigrants (the same "victims" that they're supposedly fighting for). Meanwhile, the organization blackmails and strong-arms corporations and useful idiot white liberals to donate to the cause...because of course if you don't, then that signals that you are pro-white supremacy. It's a pretty genius racket, isn't it?

So where does all of the money go? After paying their tribute to Democratic party funding to the tune of tens of millions of dollars, the leadership gets to collect their riches for their hard work. Of course, virtually none of that money goes to anything that is going to enrich the common black community or these neighbourhoods that have been burnt to the ground.

Patrisse Khan-Cullors & BLM is a Scam

Quote

As protests broke out across the country in the name of Black Lives Matter, the group’s co-founder went on a real estate-buying binge, snagging four high-end homes for $3.2 million in the US alone, according to property records.

Patrisse Khan-Cullors, 37, also eyed property in the Bahamas at an ultra-exclusive resort where Justin Timberlake and Tiger Woods both have homes, The Post has learned. Luxury apartments and townhouses at the beachfront Albany resort outside Nassau are priced between $5 million and $20 million, according to a local agent.

The self-described Marxist last month purchased a $1.4 million home on a secluded road a short drive from Malibu in Los Angeles, according to a report. The 2,370 square-foot property features “soaring ceilings, skylights and plenty of windows” with canyon views. The Topanga Canyon homestead, which includes two houses on a quarter acre, is just one of three homes Khan-Cullors owns in the Los Angeles area, public records show.

 

Do you want to be entertained even more? Her latest property, a $1.4 million dollar home....is in a ~90% white neighbourhood LMAO. Topanga Canyon has something like a 1.4% black demographic. If white people are so evil, how come all of these race-hustlers move into entirely-white neighborhoods once they swindle their millions from the useful idiots? 

[metafour 4,969]

Booker T. Washington spelt this out for all of you all the way back in 1911:

 

[DKW 86 7,419]

1) I Predict at least three Facepalms for you today.
2) I have posted up about the robbery committed by the Castro Family before. No one cares. No one will look at the facts. It violates the narrative and that is a religion for some here.

10 Surprises About Fidel Castro's Extravagant Life

Fidel Castro, Cuba’s communist dictator, former president and divisive world figure, died on November 25 at 90 years old—53 years and three days after his nemesis U.S. President John F. Kennedy. Despite their adversarial status, both men were born into wealth via extremely ambitious fathers, both loved sports, both had a mistress weakness, and both fought for their country to oust dictators. That’s where the similarities end.

 

Fidel Castro, leader of Cuba's 1959 revolution. Getty Images

JFK died young and Castro lived a long, well-heeled life. Castro survived 11 U.S. presidents. Although he didn't live in a palace and streets weren't named for him, Castro still lived more extravagantly and hypocritically than he wanted the world to know. Cuba’s revolution leader wasn’t as modest as he led on. A decade ago, Forbes estimated Fidel Castro’s personal net worth at $900 million. That's a lot of socialist rationing for one person. Luxurious living arrangements were especially appealing to Castro. But for security reasons (after hundreds of assassination attempts), Castro's paranoid personal life and residences were top secret. Even Cuban citizens didn't know where he resided.

 

Fidel Castro, one of the longest-serving world leaders, died November 25 at 90 years old. (Photo by... [+]

Here are 10 surprising nuggets about Fidel Castro’s lifestyle and ancestral homes (that is, the main two residences we know about).

1. Fidel Castro was born on his father Ángel Castro’s prosperous 25,000-acre, 400-employee sugar plantation (called Las Manacas farm) in small town Birán, Cuba—about 500 miles from Havana on the eastern end of the island. The property now serves as a Castro museum.

PROMOTED

Fidel Castro was born on this sugar plantation in 1926. (Photo by Adalberto Roque/AFP/Getty Images)

Fidel Castro was born on this sugar plantation in 1926. (Photo by Adalberto Roque/AFP/Getty Images)

2. Founded by their wealthy landowner father in 1915, Fidel and younger brother Raul Castro’s childhood home in Birán burnt down in 1954 but a replica was erected in its place in 1974.

Cuban President Fidel Castro examines photos of his relatives at his native house in Birán, Cuba.... [+]

A picture of Cuban leader Fidel Castro in his ancestral home which is now a museum. (Photo by Joe... [+]

3. Fidel and Raul’s parents, Ángel Castro and Lina Ruz González, are laid to rest at the Birán plantation. Castro’s privileged background (although non-bourgeois) contradicted his message, so to give himself street cred, he touted his grandparent’s background as “exploited Galician peasants” from Spain.

The burial site of Cuban leaders Fidel and Raul Castro's parents on the grounds of their childhood... [+]

4. Like JFK, Castro’s father sent him to boarding school where he received a quality education (despite mediocre grades). Baseball, reading, and politics were among his interests. At 14 (though he claimed he was 12), he even penned a letter to President Franklin D. Roosevelt congratulating him on his re-election while brazenly asking for $10 American cash (sounds like a secret capitalist).

As a 14-year old (not 12 as he claimed), Fidel Castro congratulated FDR on his re-election in 1940.... [+]

5. The Birán estate was more than a working sugar plantation. Prominent landowner Ángel Castro also established a primary school, hotel, pub, post office, a market store, and a ring for cockfighting (again, it sounds like a capitalist venture).

A building that served as a guest house on the Birán sugar plantation, founded by Fidel Castro's... [+]

6. Castro ruled Cuba for 49 paranoid years. He moved frequently due to an estimated 600 assassination attempts by the CIA and other foes. The failed plots are infamous—exploding cigars and poison milkshakes included. Castro eventually ceded power to his brother Raul and retired to the gated community “Punto Cero” (Point Zero), his top-secret 75-acre suburban Havana home which resembled a vast military compound.

Fidel Castro meets with Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and his brother President Raul... [+]

7. Punto Cero, a pre-revolution golf course property, was reportedly set up by Castro in the 1970s. According to Castro’s former bodyguard, the estate complex includes orange, lemon, mandarin, grapefruit and banana trees, as well as cows and six greenhouses to grow food.

Castro's compound is reportedly on the former grounds of the Havana Biltmore Yacht and Country Club.... [+]

8. Punto Cero was far from the “fisherman’s cottage” Castro publicly claimed as his main asset. The luxurious complex in the Jaimanitas neighborhood (15 miles outside Havana proper) served as Castro’s summer residence near the capital city’s embassy district. According to Castro's former bodyguard (as reported by InCuba Today), he also owned a residences in Cayo Piedra (a stones throw from the Bay of Pigs), La Caleta del Rosario, which featured a private marina; and La Deseada, a chalet in Pinar del Río—reportedly one of Castro's favorite duck hunting spots.

Fidel Castro in Pinar del Río after the 1959 Cuban revolution. Castro frequently visited and took up... [+]

9. Retired Fidel Castro met foreign leaders, dignitaries and Popes at Punto Cero, including Pope John Paul II in 1998, Pope Benedict in 2012, and Pope Francis in 2015. Despite his Jesuit background, Castro was an atheist. Yet he still reveled meeting Popes, even exchanging religious books with them.

Pope Francis meets Fidel Castro in Havana, Cuba in 2015. The Vatican described the meeting at... [+]

10. According to President Raul Castro who announced his brother's death, Fidel will be cremated and given a state funeral—perhaps with a final resting place near his parents on the Birán plantation. Although, in Fidel fashion, that is still a secret.

[TexasTiger 12,830]

11 hours ago, metafour said:

You literally can't make this sh*t up. Surprise, leftists! All of your "social justice" icons  are really just grifters and conmen. Anyone with any knowledge of history knows that Marxism/Communism (aka "Socialism") is just a front for the "revolutionaries" to amass wealth through theft, without any actual merit.

Hence why in every single Marxist society throughout history the elite and their inner circle live like Kings and Queens, while the "common man" is equal...in destitute.

 

So what did BLM accomplish? They sparked riots all across the country in impoverished black neighbourhoods that resulted in BLACK-OWNED businesses being looted and destroyed. Property taxes in these cities and neighborhoods of course shot through the roof, and businesses and jobs fled. They defunded the police which has caused catastrophic increase in murder, and basically every form of crime imaginable in areas of the country predominantly comprised of black Americans and immigrants (the same "victims" that they're supposedly fighting for). Meanwhile, the organization blackmails and strong-arms corporations and useful idiot white liberals to donate to the cause...because of course if you don't, then that signals that you are pro-white supremacy. It's a pretty genius racket, isn't it?

So where does all of the money go? After paying their tribute to Democratic party funding to the tune of tens of millions of dollars, the leadership gets to collect their riches for their hard work. Of course, virtually none of that money goes to anything that is going to enrich the common black community or these neighbourhoods that have been burnt to the ground.

Patrisse Khan-Cullors & BLM is a Scam

 

Do you want to be entertained even more? Her latest property, a $1.4 million dollar home....is in a ~90% white neighbourhood LMAO. Topanga Canyon has something like a 1.4% black demographic. If white people are so evil, how come all of these race-hustlers move into entirely-white neighborhoods once they swindle their millions from the useful idiots? 

No one said Trump was the only grifter and con man— you do see that, too— right?

[AUDub 11,147]

2 hours ago, TexasTiger said:

No one said Trump was the only grifter and con man— you do see that, too— right?

It's an ideologically diverse field lol. 

[CoffeeTiger 5,101]

is there even a communist believing user active on this forum? 

[TexasTiger 12,830]

13 minutes ago, CoffeeTiger said:

is there even a communist believing user active on this forum? 

If they’re lurking here they are hereby on notice!

[homersapien 11,366]

What an insane rant.

[TitanTiger 20,472]

On 4/12/2021 at 8:40 AM, CoffeeTiger said:

is there even a communist believing user active on this forum? 

In the minds of some here, being a Democrat in American politics is tantamount to Marxism.  Nuance or a real understanding of terms isn't really their thing.  So they'd probably answer, "yes."

[cole256 17,043]

Lol.....this clown is hilarious. Of course this comes from a guy who will fight to the death that anything isn't racist. He argued how blackface isn't racist......your slip is showing

[TitanTiger 20,472]

59 minutes ago, cole256 said:

Lol.....this clown is hilarious. Of course this comes from a guy who will fight to the death that anything isn't racist. He argued how blackface isn't racist......your slip is showing

Regardless of the issues with the messenger here, you have to admit it's a tad hypocritical to be a founder and leader of an openly socialist group getting this rich off of contributions from the rank and file.  It reminds me of megachurch pastors and televangelists who live in mansions and own private Jetstreams who are always appealing for more donations from the faithful.

[cole256 17,043]

2 hours ago, TitanTiger said:

Regardless of the issues with the messenger here, you have to admit it's a tad hypocritical to be a founder and leader of an openly socialist group getting this rich off of contributions from the rank and file.  It reminds me of megachurch pastors and televangelists who live in mansions and own private Jetstreams who are always appealing for more donations from the faithful.

I find it no different than any other group or organization. And the thing that it seems many don't get as far as black lives matter it really is a message much more than a group. The only people that are concerned about who leads it are usually people that has a problem with black lives actually mattering. If you asked most people about the head of the organization most don't know.  Whoever is, is certainly not viewed as a leader.

And I'm always going to look at the messenger. If the messenger is a person who is always going to look for a reason to argue against holding racist actions accountable I'm absolutely not going to take anything that they say serious.

[McLoofus 35,182]

BLM the organization is representative of BLM the movement much like Westboro Baptist is representative of Christianity. 

I doubt this was a shocking revelation to very many on any side. Not any more than some salivating MAGA trying to turn it into one. 

 

[DKW 86 7,419]

I think yall are taking this WAY too personally. "Marxists" whether in the 20th or 21st Century Editions are really just camouflaged authoritarians. They are dictators with a pseudo-populist cover. It isnt serious, It is in fact very humorous. Anyone that thinks that "marxism" is anything else but variation on "oligarchic capitalism" is crazy. It is just a cover for "oligarchic capitalism" that makes them and a very small group of family members and friends incredibly wealthy as they seize control of all the businesses etc in a nation. Patrisse has made a mint for herself and a small group of "Fellow Travelers." It is nothing new. Those that call themselves "marxists" are almost never really "marxists" at all. Patrisse just gave 21st Century America an IN-YO-FACE Reminder. 

<lmao>

 

[TitanTiger 20,472]

1 hour ago, cole256 said:

I find it no different than any other group or organization. And the thing that it seems many don't get as far as black lives matter it really is a message much more than a group. The only people that are concerned about who leads it are usually people that has a problem with black lives actually mattering. If you asked most people about the head of the organization most don't know.  Whoever is, is certainly not viewed as a leader.

I think CEOs of for-profit corporations are generally viewed differently than CEOs of non-profit organizations, and rightfully so.  And within non-profits, I think that there are degrees as well.  Pastors aren't seen the same as the head of the Red Cross for instance.  And if you head up an organization that aside from its very worthwhile work for black lives, espouses very clearly a socialist economic belief and mission, and you're buying millions of dollars worth of houses all over the country - you deserve the scrutiny and criticism you get for that.

To say that doesn't change the fact that black lives *should* and *do* matter.  Nor does it mean that you don't care about black lives - anymore than pointing out when a pastor or televangelist is enriching himself off the contributions of regular folks means you're anti-Christianity.

 

Quote

And I'm always going to look at the messenger. If the messenger is a person who is always going to look for a reason to argue against holding racist actions accountable I'm absolutely not going to take anything that they say serious.

I get that.  But looking at the messenger can't be the totality of the counterargument.

[cole256 17,043]

31 minutes ago, TitanTiger said:

I think CEOs of for-profit corporations are generally viewed differently than CEOs of non-profit organizations, and rightfully so.  And within non-profits, I think that there are degrees as well.  Pastors aren't seen the same as the head of the Red Cross for instance.  And if you head up an organization that aside from its very worthwhile work for black lives, espouses very clearly a socialist economic belief and mission, and you're buying millions of dollars worth of houses all over the country - you deserve the scrutiny and criticism you get for that.

To say that doesn't change the fact that black lives *should* and *do* matter.  Nor does it mean that you don't care about black lives - anymore than pointing out when a pastor or televangelist is enriching himself off the contributions of regular folks means you're anti-Christianity.

 

I get that.  But looking at the messenger can't be the totality of the counterargument.

Lol. Whatever it is you want to argue you go ahead and do what you want. I could care less about scrutiny. Like I said that's common to most organizations. Of course if money isn't used for it's purpose then there's a problem. That really goes without saying.

Hell this particular guy has tried to argue the NFL is squeaky clean....but this is what really pushes his buttons lol.

I'm addressing the overall thoughts in totality which includes the person saying it and their history and to that I mean every word that I said originally.

I'm not scared of these clowns with their bigoted views. If I see it I'm going to out it. 

 

[TitanTiger 20,472]

27 minutes ago, cole256 said:

Lol. Whatever it is you want to argue you go ahead and do what you want. I could care less about scrutiny.

But you're pushing back against the scrutiny as if it's unwarranted, so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.

 

Quote

Like I said that's common to most organizations. Of course if money isn't used for it's purpose then there's a problem. That really goes without saying.

It's common to many organizations, but so is the criticism.  In other words, when leadership's actions seem to contradict in some way the espoused mission of the organization, then critique is warranted.  That's not a race or color issue.  In this case, there is an espousing of a socialist "share the wealth" view but then taking the contributions of poor and working class folks to live a life of abundance and privilege.  It's "socialism for thee but not for me."

 

Quote

Hell this particular guy has tried to argue the NFL is squeaky clean....but this is what really pushes his buttons lol.

I'm addressing the overall thoughts in totality which includes the person saying it and their history and to that I mean every word that I said originally.

I'm not scared of these clowns with their bigoted views. If I see it I'm going to out it. 

OP is gonna OP.  We know what we have there and I can't burn up personal energy over him.  I'm just discussing the subject.

[Trakem 85]

Nothing to see here.  Some Fascists/Marxists are more equal than others.

[cole256 17,043]

1 hour ago, TitanTiger said:

But you're pushing back against the scrutiny as if it's unwarranted, so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.

 

It's common to many organizations, but so is the criticism.  In other words, when leadership's actions seem to contradict in some way the espoused mission of the organization, then critique is warranted.  That's not a race or color issue.  In this case, there is an espousing of a socialist "share the wealth" view but then taking the contributions of poor and working class folks to live a life of abundance and privilege.  It's "socialism for thee but not for me."

 

OP is gonna OP.  We know what we have there and I can't burn up personal energy over him.  I'm just discussing the subject.

And yet your posts will get a bunch of likes from certain individuals......and I still stand by everything I said. Some people are going to run and hide behind your post. 

It's funny how it works out. When people agree about stuff of this nature it will be in PM's but literally every thread on here when it's a time stuff can be addressed I guarantee it will be a couple of people like this arguing about something off topic....I don't ever get the debate about the pointless stuff in the PM's but a bunch of people calling out the bigot stuff with me. I can count on 3 guys to say something. 

And that's actually society in a nutshell. That's why those guys still thrive

[TitanTiger 20,472]

7 minutes ago, cole256 said:

And yet your posts will get a bunch of likes from certain individuals......and I still stand by everything I said. Some people are going to run and hide behind your post. 

I can't help what people do.  I can't decide what the right side of a discussion is by who's going to agree with it.

 

7 minutes ago, cole256 said:

It's funny how it works out. When people agree about stuff of this nature it will be in PM's but literally every thread on here when it's a time stuff can be addressed I guarantee it will be a couple of people like this arguing about something off topic....I don't ever get the debate about the pointless stuff in the PM's but a bunch of people calling out the bigot stuff with me. I can count on 3 guys to say something. 

And that's actually society in a nutshell. That's why those guys still thrive

Well, I can't speak for all that.  I know I'm not calling your out for anything and any adjacent agreement over a part of this subject matter that happens with meta or any of his ilk is incidental.

I'm simply saying - when someone heads up an organization that is fueled by donations from a whole lot of working class folks, and one of the organization's core tenets is a socialist economic worldview but leadership is enriching themselves to the tune of multiple homes worth tens of millions on those donations, they deserve the criticism and the blowback for it.  Holding good and right views on other matters isn't a vaccination against getting called out for this.

[cole256 17,043]

Just now, TitanTiger said:

I can't help what people do.  I can't decide what the right side of a discussion is by who's going to agree with it.

 

Well, I can't speak for all that.  I know I'm not calling your out for anything and any adjacent agreement over a part of this subject matter that happens with meta or any of his ilk is incidental.

I'm simply saying - when someone heads up an organization that is fueled by donations from a whole lot of working class folks, and one of the organization's core tenets is a socialist economic worldview but leadership is enriching themselves to the tune of multiple homes worth tens of millions on those donations, they deserve the criticism and the blowback for it.  Holding good and right views on other matters isn't a vaccination against getting called out for this.

And no where did anybody say hey that's ok don't talk about that!

What I did do was explain how that movement is much more than the organization and I'm not going to let the guy with the history set up that the purpose of blm isn't legit. Which I double down and say again. You're smart enough to know what he's doing too but if you don't want to talk about that that's cool, I respect it. I don't want to talk about the pointless debate about scrutiny because there hasn't even been a disagreement. 

 

[TitanTiger 20,472]

4 minutes ago, cole256 said:

And no where did anybody say hey that's ok don't talk about that!

What I did do was explain how that movement is much more than the organization and I'm not going to let the guy with the history set up that the purpose of blm isn't legit. Which I double down and say again. You're smart enough to know what he's doing too but if you don't want to talk about that that's cool, I respect it. I don't want to talk about the pointless debate about scrutiny because there hasn't even been a disagreement. 

Look, he's is an idiot on this stuff.  I totally get that.  I think we can separate his intentions in bringing stuff like this up from the rest of the discussion.

I agree, the idea that *black lives matter* is one that me and you at least are in complete agreement on, and the actions or hypocrisy of the political organization or certain members therein doesn't change that.  The only people arguing against it are people who refuse to listen.

 

[NolaAuTiger 3,295]

Titan is in the red:

[CoffeeTiger 5,101]

Now I just looked into this story a bit deeper than before, and contrary to what I was first assuming, it looks like this BLM co-founder isn't really being accused of misusing funds or donations. BLM says they don't pay her a salary and that they didn't buy any of the houses, which doesn't seem to be in dispute. It seems she's used her activist popularity to sell a lot of books that she's authored and her and her activist partner does speaking engagements. She apparently teaches at a college and recently signed a move deal with a studio. 

 

Is it a bit eyerollingly silly for a self described Marxist to take full advantage of America's capitalistic system? Yeah, it is. That's something her supporters and believers will have to look at and translate for themselves.

But I don't see any accusation that she's done anything wrong here per se. 

She found her niche that made her famous and made her a best selling author and got her rich in the process. That's about as American as you can get. 

[McLoofus 35,182]

9 minutes ago, CoffeeTiger said:

She found her niche that made her famous and made her a best selling author and got her rich in the process. That's about as American as you can get. 

Does sound quite a bit like a recently deposed wannabe despot. Rode those exact qualities to the top and they still love him for it.