Jump to content
Null

Leaks? Why is the Left not concerned about WHO or WHY SCOTUS Draft was leaked?


Recommended Posts





Guessing we just have to give it time and comments will flow, but have a hard time believing that undermining institutions as our founders intended will be applauded here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Stop trying to make the leak the story. 

 

The contents are bad enough. 

Edited by AUDub
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Republicans want to pretend that’s THE story. The bigger story is why a party that has claimed this is their primary goal for 40+ years is deflecting from their apparent victory. Gonna run on a “No draft opinion leaks!” In the mid-terms? 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, AUDub said:

Stop trying to make the leak the story. 

 

The contents are bad enough. 

The leak is a story. The intent to disrupt court opinion threatened. That should not be a partisan opinion.

Content weighed separately.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, TexasTiger said:

Republicans want to pretend that’s THE story. The bigger story is why a party that has claimed this is their primary goal for 40+ years is deflecting from their apparent victory. Gonna run on a “No draft opinion leaks!” In the mid-terms? 

It is a story. Should be non-partisan. As much as the democrats want this violation of protocol to disappear, it will not. I will not be surprised if the offender is disbarred. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, AUFAN78 said:

It is a story. Should be non-partisan. As much as the democrats want this violation of protocol to disappear, it will not. I will not be surprised if the offender is disbarred. 

Sure it’s a story. It’s not the bigger story. And Republicans are already acting like they know it’s a Democrat. None of us know. A Republican seems at least as likely to me.
 

Can you cite the basis for disbarment? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, TexasTiger said:

Sure it’s a story. It’s not the bigger story. And Republicans are already acting like they know it’s a Democrat. None of us know. A Republican seems at least as likely to me.
 

Can you cite the basis for disbarment? 

Didn't say it was. I don't really care what Republicans nor you are thinking. This should not be partisan as previously mentioned.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/is-it-illegal-leak-us-supreme-court-opinion-2022-05-03/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, AUFAN78 said:

Didn't say it was. I don't really care what Republicans nor you are thinking. This should not be partisan as previously mentioned.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/is-it-illegal-leak-us-supreme-court-opinion-2022-05-03/

Republican messaging is making the leak partisan. They’re out to create a perception before the facts are know. 
 

Personally, I add it to a long list of norms I believe we would be better off not trashing. Most Republicans just started their list today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TexasTiger said:

Republican messaging is making the leak partisan. They’re out to create a perception before the facts are know. 
 

Personally, I add it to a long list of norms I believe we would be better off not trashing. Most Republicans just started their list today.

Perhaps, but dismissal of leak is doing what exactly? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TexasTiger said:

Who’s dismissed it?

Our president? Have you seen his comment on the leak?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TexasTiger said:

Don’t hang on his every word— got a link?

LOL. Don't worry. BTW, There is no link to him acknowledging wrongdoing. When asked he deflected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, TexasTiger said:

So you made it up?

What? The president was asked specifically about the leak and deflected. Nothing made up about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Supreme court says they are going to investigate as they should.

 

No the left isn't hiding the leak...everyone knows the draft wasn't supposed to be given to the press...nobody is trying to hide that fact...?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, TexasTiger said:

Link to your claim.

When asked about his thoughts on the ruling or the draft leak he addressed ruling, not draft leak. IMO he should have addressed both. 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, AUFAN78 said:

When asked about his thoughts on the ruling or the draft leak he addressed ruling, not draft leak. IMO he should have addressed both. 

 

 

Focusing on the bigger issue is only “deflecting” in the mind of the partisan ideologue.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AUFAN78 said:

The leak is a story. The intent to disrupt court opinion threatened. That should not be a partisan opinion.

Content weighed separately.

Leaks have happened before and will happen again. This is far from unprecedented. Don't let that distract from just how bad this draft opinion is on multiple fronts. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TexasTiger said:

Focusing on the bigger issue is only “deflecting” in the mind of the partisan ideologue.

Avoidance is a form of deflection. Not that a partisan ideologue would have that understanding.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AUDub said:

Leaks have happened before and will happen again. This is far from unprecedented. Don't let that distract from just how bad this draft opinion is on multiple fronts. 

Never said otherwise. I simply pointed out it was a story and should be for our entire populace. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AUFAN78 said:

Avoidance is a form of deflection. Not that a partisan ideologue would have that understanding.

The leak is interesting— it doesn’t change the law of the land for 50 years. You’re a good little bot, though. Responds on cue like you’re programmed to do!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, TexasTiger said:

The leak is interesting— it doesn’t change the law of the land for 50 years. You’re a good little bot, though. Responds on cue like you’re programmed to do!

Yo Vlad Jr.,  I am not surprised you comprehend said programming. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...