AURocketman

Link says this organization is currently unable to accept donations.

4 minutes ago, TXaubie said:

Was listening and watching. Kind of surprised on the AU radio side. The CBS crew made a way bigger deal about it being wrong than AU radio. Which may be a first!!  

Listening to AU Radio they were vocal that there was an angle that looked like it was not touched.  There were several calls they questioned or said Refs missed.  By this time they were trying not to not sound over the top.  

On 10/31/2022 at 3:51 PM, TigerPAC said:

still curious as to why now?  why did this take SO long?  was mcglynn not given the ability to fire him, until a new AD was for sure on the horizon?  i guess its water under the bridge now, but i'd like to know the semantics.

Cause next Saturday the buses and team can help Cohen move his family and stuff to Auburn from Starkville Saturday.

It’s not Rocket Science!

Can you put a coach in prison?  1 year might not be enough.

I’ve heard it said what he is doing is criminal or should be a crime. Something like that

3 hours ago, bigbird said:

Most of the good receivers will try and trick the DBs to turn and look by either widening their eyes, starting to slow down, or even start to reach or lift their hands. Any way they do it, the objective is to get the DB to turn and look so they can then take off on them.

This^^^^^

2 hours ago, ellitor said:

Maybe not. Most teams do it for their man coverage techniques. They must do it for a reason.

This^^^^

Well the preference would be to have DBs that are a step quicker and more athletic than the opponents receiver so they can always control them if I may  expand on Bigbirds previous post.  

When matched athleticism, the DB is already at a disadvantage due to having to react to WR moves.  WR can fake looking for a catch and turn a DB.  The DB is usually trying to REcover Ground as WR tries to separate.

The reason is more parity in athletic talent.  

Came down to one Les second.

2 hours ago, Richard78 said:

I keep seeing references to our D being gassed. I'm sure they were from chasing Knight, but facts are that we ran 12 more plays than TAMU and led time of possession.

But most of AU time of possession was standing and looking at sidelines pre-snap. TAMU time of possession had more running after snap.