For anyone that likes to compare the 2009 and 2011 teams

[aubfaninga 16]

2009 had alot more upper classman playing while 2011 was very young

2009

lost to Ark (8-5), lost to Kentucky (7-6), lost to LSU (9-4), lost to Georgia (8-5), and lost to the turds (14-0 SEC Champ and NC) Most notable win: #20 Ole Miss

1 top 25 team and only 1 won atleast 10 games

2011

lost to #22 Clemson (10-4 ACC champ), lost to #5 Ark (11-2 only losses to LSU and Bama), loss to #2 LSU (13-1 SEC Champ only loss was to bama), loss to #19 Georgia (10-4 SEC East Champ), and loss to the turds (12-1 NC only loss was to LSU) Most notable win: #9 uSC

5 top 25 teams and all five had 10 or more wins

The future only gets brighter!!!!!!!

[FoleyLion 0]

While this can be looked at as improvement you have to look at the way they lost, 2009 team was better then our '11 squad but our '11 squad has more talent and potential than the 09 team. So I would say that the 2 teams are totally different and shouldn't be compared. The future is indeed bright if the young players make the right choices.

[aubfaninga 16]

While this can be looked at as improvement you have to look at the way they lost, 2009 team was better then our '11 squad but our '11 squad has more talent and potential than the 09 team. So I would say that the 2 teams are totally different and shouldn't be compared. The future is indeed bright if the young players make the right choices.

Understand your logic

I ask that you look at how other teams fared against the same teams we lost to in 2009. Then do the same for 2011. The teams we lost to in 2009 were not world beaters. Very good teams from 2011