Jump to content

Offensive questions


PCBAuburnaFan

Recommended Posts

1) why not more power I run plays with Prosch (we always need more Prosch)

2)Can Kiehl run the option? (Not read option an actual sweep option could be a great way to get o-Mac on the outside

3)why not use Prosch for pass blocking on obvious passing downs?

4) we fail at screens but why not slants?

Link to comment
Share on other sites





1) why not more power I run plays with Prosch (we always need more Prosch)

2)Can Kiehl run the option? (Not read option an actual sweep option could be a great way to get o-Mac on the outside

3)why not use Prosch for pass blocking on obvious passing downs?

4) we fail at screens but why not slants?

Power I? True Option? Is the goal to make our offense as antiquated as possible?

That will work in the SEC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) why not more power I run plays with Prosch (we always need more Prosch)

2)Can Kiehl run the option? (Not read option an actual sweep option could be a great way to get o-Mac on the outside

3)why not use Prosch for pass blocking on obvious passing downs?

4) we fail at screens but why not slants?

Power I? True Option? Is the goal to make our offense as antiquated as possible?

That will work in the SEC.

LSU has been pretty success full running the power I for a while, as a matter of fact, its the only formation that they have been able to muster yards out of for several years now and they made it to the national championship game last year with a pair of horrible QB's

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) why not more power I run plays with Prosch (we always need more Prosch)

2)Can Kiehl run the option? (Not read option an actual sweep option could be a great way to get o-Mac on the outside

3)why not use Prosch for pass blocking on obvious passing downs?

4) we fail at screens but why not slants?

Power I? True Option? Is the goal to make our offense as antiquated as possible?

That will work in the SEC.

LSU has been pretty success full running the power I for a while, as a matter of fact, its the only formation that they have been able to muster yards out of for several years now and they made it to the national championship game last year with a pair of horrible QB's

I think you are talking about the I formation. Don't recall them being in the power I

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) why not more power I run plays with Prosch (we always need more Prosch)

2)Can Kiehl run the option? (Not read option an actual sweep option could be a great way to get o-Mac on the outside

3)why not use Prosch for pass blocking on obvious passing downs?

4) we fail at screens but why not slants?

Power I? True Option? Is the goal to make our offense as antiquated as possible?

That will work in the SEC.

LSU has been pretty success full running the power I for a while, as a matter of fact, its the only formation that they have been able to muster yards out of for several years now and they made it to the national championship game last year with a pair of horrible QB's

I think you are talking about the I formation. Don't recall them being in the power I

sorry, I believe you are correct

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) why not more power I run plays with Prosch (we always need more Prosch)

Great question. SL is an idiot thats why we ain't doing it more.

2)Can Kiehl run the option? (Not read option an actual sweep option could be a great way to get o-Mac on the outside

I'm all for this. Frazier stares at the line after he looks down Blake, why not eliminate a step.

3)why not use Prosch for pass blocking on obvious passing downs?

See question #1

4) we fail at screens but why not slants?

Quarterback sees one reciver. When he ain't open Down Goes Frazier!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...