Jump to content

This is embarrasing...


AUgrad00

Recommended Posts





  • Replies 107
  • Created
  • Last Reply

These football programs have to get money somehow. Might as well make a cool mil plus paid expenses. Not to mention playing on skme legendary fields in front of a real crowd.

Ask them how they feel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shouldn't be too embarrassing. Well probably end up playing at least 3 top 10 teams this year. Those teams just happen to be in our conference, and we play them every year. I wonder how many top 25 teams we end up playing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who cares....we play in the sec and after the 04 season an sec school won't be left out on any contention anytime soon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Embarrassing to who? Im not embarrassed..this is the off season and writers have to write something. I would like to see better games scheduled but to be embarrassed by a football schedule...surely you jest?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

uat, UGA, LSU and aTm will probably all be ranked in the top 15 when the polls come out. How many teams outside the SEC can say they will play as many? If SEC teams schedule too many more traditonal power teams in the non-conference schedule than we might as well go to playing 9-10 conference games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh no not this again. ESPN et al were hammering us for playing non-conference Citadel in 2004 when our CONFERENCE schedule included beating 4 top 10 SEC teams on the way to going undefeated (UT twice), not to mention beating top 10 Va Tech in our bowl game. Kudos to those SEC teams playing non-joke teams outside the SEC (UF vs FSU, UGa vs Ga Tech, USC vs Clemson etc) but when talking about SEC teams, whining about an easy non-conference schedule became a moronic argument after about 2002. It's an argument usually made by butt hurt Big 10, Pac whatever or ACC fans/media.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

uat, UGA, LSU and aTm will probably all be ranked in the top 15 when the polls come out. How many teams outside the SEC can say they will play as many? If SEC teams schedule too many more traditonal power teams in the non-conference schedule than we might as well go to playing 9-10 conference games.

I agree....the whole out of conference SOS argument is just silly drivel when discussing SEC schedules

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not embarrassing to me. We play a gauntlet of teams in conference. Other schools conferences are weaker, so they need the OOC schedule to bolster their strength of schedule. Ours is strong by default.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both Auburn and Alabama should be ashamed. This is embarrasing. Go play people.

I love how competition is discouraged in college football.

http://www.al.com/sp...t_river_default

Why are you embarrassed and ashamed? It's difficult enough to win in our own conference, hell we didn't win a single SEC game in '12. Screw the folks that want to poke fun at our OOC schedules - Screw 'em!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only teams that make a big deal out of OOC games are those that don't play in a tough conference. The last I checked, every team in the SEC had an SOS of #35 (Bama,lol) or above, 10 teams were # 20 or above, 5 teams were #10 or above and AU was at #12. SEC teams don't have to worry about this nonsense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's embarrassing is that people continue to pay to watch games against terrible competition. If folks stayed away from games against Western Carolina & FAU, you may start to see better match-ups.

And no, I do not care about what the rest of the country does or how tough the SEC can be. I care about the value of the game vs the amount the university chooses to charge. There's a reason SEC and big non-conference games typically sell out and lower tier games don't. Because fewer people want to pay $50 to watch a glorified scrimmage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

uat, UGA, LSU and aTm will probably all be ranked in the top 15 when the polls come out. How many teams outside the SEC can say they will play as many? If SEC teams schedule too many more traditonal power teams in the non-conference schedule than we might as well go to playing 9-10 conference games.

For once i agree with golf! Just joking. I don't think our non-conference schedule is a big deal...all of the SEC's schedules regarding non-conference as far as that is concerned. Why go schedule a middle or bottom tier team in the ACC, Big 12..etc. when when can add another SEC team like FL or USCe. The SEC is only getting better so we're only going to have more teams ranked in the top 25. I'm fine with the fact that we only play 1 decent team out of conference. If writers and other conferences don't like it..start beating us in bowl games and win some NC's. Right now we can do as we please!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As long as winning them all still gets us into the championship game, I don't care who we play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nonsense.

Weak SEC schedules are apparently still plenty strong enough to get teams in the mncg with one loss. Hell, two teams from the same conference that plays those weak OOC schedules made the championship game just two years ago.

Meanwhile, the so-called traditional powers the media and other conferences would like for SEC teams to play can't even go undefeated or have one loss in their own conferences that are filled with programs bordering on cupcake levels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you focus on 1/3 of the schedule it might be. Over the past 5 years, Alabama, Florida, LSU and UGA have the highest overall win pct in the SEC yet they are a combined 46-43 against SEC teams with a win pct. of .600 or better. Life in the conference is a war zone. Seven straight BCSNC teams from the SEC tells the real story about the BEST conference in College Football. More HS talent signs with SEC programs than any other conference and the SEC produces more NFL talent than any other conference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is embarrassing and shameful is that we regularly have undefeated teams from the big ten, pac #, big 12, etc. that can't beat out a one loss SEC team EVER for a shot at the title.

Their strength of schedule debate really holds a lot of water when a team runs the table and it means next to nothing nationally.

It is time for a new anti-SEC rallying cry for all those who are so tired of this conference dominating. The SOS debate is pointless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only teams that make a big deal out of OOC games are those that don't play in a tough conference. The last I checked, every team in the SEC had an SOS of #35 (Bama,lol) or above, 11 teams were # 20 or above, 5 teams were #10 or above and AU was at #12. SEC teams don't have to worry about this nonsense.

where are you getting those numbers from? (foreseeing a lot of bammers wanting to argue this throughout the summer)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to the NCAA, here are the national rankings for SOS the last 5 years...

Auburn: 6, 3, 3, 19, 39

Alabama: 19, 5, 9, 2, 35

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...