Racism from the party that says: "It’s Different When We Do It"

[Tigermike 4,082]

Liberal Racism

Derek Hunter

May 04, 2014

Los Angeles Clippers owner Donald Sterling is being run out of professional basketball for racist comments he made in private while both Democrats and Republicans rightly cheer. Racism, many in the media would tell you, is no longer acceptable in America. But that’s a lie. Racism in America is dying, but it’s not dead yet. It’s being kept alive by the Democratic Party.

I recently went to New York to see Bryan Cranston on Broadway play President Lyndon Baines Johnson in All The Way. It was an excellent performance, but it was an incredibly well-crafted piece of propaganda.

The hero, LBJ, has to fight racist Republicans and many Democrats to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1964. He feels compelled to do this because it’s right and it finished the work of JFK, whom he replaced after Kennedy was assassinated. But although JFK is routinely cited as a civil rights hero, it’s rarely noted he did little more than pay lip service to the cause, constantly putting off the NAACP because he was afraid it would hurt him in the 1964 election. In other words, President Kennedy put his own political fortune ahead of what was right. Not exactly the quality one seeks in a hero.

But LBJ would not be stopped, at least according to the play. And he really does deserve credit for pushing what JFK wouldn’t try. But the cooperation of Republicans, without whom Democrats would have filibustered and blocked the bill, is downplayed.

This is how history is written – not in books or the public record, but in the minds of a disconnected public that gets its news from pop culture. LBJ’s racism also is downplayed – he’s simply a man working to do what is right, though often in a Machiavellian way. The play refers to LBJ’s Great Society, but only in passing – it focuses on the Civil Rights Act and his election in November 1964. This leaves the audience with an incomplete picture of LBJ’s legacy, one that perpetuates the myth of an altruistic hero.

But that altruistic hero went on to implement anti-poverty programs that have trapped generations of Americans in poverty and created a loyal base of voters for his party that successive Democrats have exploited to obtain and maintain power.

“Vote for us and we’ll give you stuff” has been the subtext of every major Democratic campaign of the last 40 years. In the black community, this scare tactic has been cynically married to the charge of racism, creating a 1-2 punch that ensures the Democrats’ power base, even though blacks’ unemployment rate stands at 11.6 now – nearly twice that of all Americans and higher than any other ethnic group. How’s that loyalty working out?

When Republicans attempt to reform anti-poverty programs, liberals cry racism. Why? Because they equate “poor” with “black” – even though there are more white people on welfare than any other race. It’s Pavlovian – but in this case liberals are both Pavlov and the dog.

Democrats have locked up the black vote for generations not because they’ve solved any problems in the black community – those they’ve attempted to address have done nothing but get worse – but because they’ve cynically, and diabolically injected race into every issue and labeled with “otherness,” anyone who strays from the orthodoxy they’ve deemed “acceptable thought” for black Americans.

Where Sterling was run out of public life for his racist comments, elected Democrats face no repercussions for theirs. The late Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.V., a former leader of the KKK, twice was elected the majority leader in the U.S. Senate and served a 6-year stint as, ironically, minority leader in between. Add Harry Reid, Joe Biden, Bill Clinton and countless others to the list of elected Democrats who’ve said things just as racist as Sterling, yet faced no consequences. And that list continually grows.

In one of the most disgusting displays of recent liberal bigotry, U.S. Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., called Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas an “Uncle Tom” on a radio show for the New Nation Of Islam. Hilariously, the host immediately said, “You said that, I didn’t.” You know it’s bad when the New Nation Of Islam host distances himself from a bigoted comment.

When confronted about his hateful comments the next day by CNN, Thompson was unrepentant, saying he could call Thomas an “Uncle Tom” because he’s black too. "Well if you look at his decisions on the court, they have been adverse to the minority community,” Thompson said. “And the people I represent have a real issue with an African American not being sensitive to those issues."

In other words, Thompson’s problem is Clarence Thomas takes his oath to the Constitution too seriously and should ignore it to “favor” people who share his skin color. To liberals, people are their skin color first, and that should dictate their thoughts and behavior. To stray from that is somehow a betrayal. It’s the basest form of racism, even if the victim and the perpetrator share the same melanin.

But was Thompson rebuked for his assault? Did Democratic leadership criticize him for accusing Thomas of leaving the liberals’ mental plantation? Quite the opposite.

U.S. Rep. James Clyburn, D-S.C., the No.3 Democrat in the House, was asked on MSNBC’s Morning Joe if he agreed Thomas was an “Uncle Tom” for not adhering to liberal orthodoxy. His reply was “Well, I don’t know.”

Let that sink in.

This is the assistant Democratic leader, not some backbencher. Clyburn’s refusal to rebuke Thompson is an implicit embrace of what Thompson said. And, more importantly, think of what Thompson’s words imply – if you are black and you stray from the liberal/progressive ideology, you’re betraying your race.

To progressives, you aren’t an individual, you’re your skin. Clarence Thomas isn’t a man, he’s a black man. He isn’t an American, he’s an African American. It’s the prefix, not the person, that matters. That, at its core, is racism.

Donald Sterling never will be accepted in polite society again, and rightfully so. He may even be forced to sell his NBA team for his private racist comments. Meanwhile, Democrats will continue to exude racism publicly, and proudly, in the hope that it scares the hell out of voters, particularly minority voters, and keeps them from realizing their lives depend more on who they are and what they do than on any politician or party. Democrats will continue to convince people that even though their lives haven’t improved after decades of loyally voting for Democrats and their ever-increasing government programs, the alternative is worse, so don’t try it.

It’s divisive, cynical, cruel, un-American and racist. It’s also the path to, the reason for, and the basis of Democrats’ power. As long as it works, they’ll never stop doing it.

link

Obama's post-racial America? No the dems have been doing it long before he came on the scene.

[icanthearyou 4,468]

Yea TM. That's write. Them commie racists bastards wood never appoint no minority to the Supreem Court. They is racist thug commie homos who hate America.

Show me a dimocrap libtard and ill show you a racist.

[Tigermike 4,082]

Yea TM. That's write. Them commie racists bastards wood never appoint no minority to the Supreem Court. They is racist thug commie homos who hate America.

Show me a dimocrap libtard and ill show you a racist.

Translation: democrats can't be racist because they care for 'the little people'. democrats can't be racist because they are better than conservatives.

[icanthearyou 4,468]

Yea TM. That's write. Them commie racists bastards wood never appoint no minority to the Supreem Court. They is racist thug commie homos who hate America.

Show me a dimocrap libtard and ill show you a racist.

Translation: democrats can't be racist because they care for 'the little people'. democrats can't be racist because they are better than conservatives.

Wrong. The correct translation would be: Yet another heavily biased article posted by TM that has almost nothing to do with reality and everything to do with making a stupid partisan political statement.

Are there Republicans who are racists? Are there Democrats who are racists? Does that make them all racists? Can you make such an asinine generalization as the article does? Well, obviously you can. Should you? Aren't asinine generalizations, in large part, the basis of racism? Stupid, really stupid. Ignorance on display.

[Tigermike 4,082]

Yea TM. That's write. Them commie racists bastards wood never appoint no minority to the Supreem Court. They is racist thug commie homos who hate America.

Show me a dimocrap libtard and ill show you a racist.

Translation: democrats can't be racist because they care for 'the little people'. democrats can't be racist because they are better than conservatives.

Wrong. The correct translation would be: Yet another heavily biased article posted by TM that has almost nothing to do with reality and everything to do with making a stupid partisan political statement.

Are there Republicans who are racists? Are there Democrats who are racists? Does that make them all racists? Can you make such an asinine generalization as the article does? Well, obviously you can. Should you? Aren't asinine generalizations, in large part, the basis of racism? Stupid, really stupid. Ignorance on display. (Yep you are showing your ignorance.)

Show where the article is wrong.

[icanthearyou 4,468]

Yea TM. That's write. Them commie racists bastards wood never appoint no minority to the Supreem Court. They is racist thug commie homos who hate America.

Show me a dimocrap libtard and ill show you a racist.

Translation: democrats can't be racist because they care for 'the little people'. democrats can't be racist because they are better than conservatives.

Wrong. The correct translation would be: Yet another heavily biased article posted by TM that has almost nothing to do with reality and everything to do with making a stupid partisan political statement.

Are there Republicans who are racists? Are there Democrats who are racists? Does that make them all racists? Can you make such an asinine generalization as the article does? Well, obviously you can. Should you? Aren't asinine generalizations, in large part, the basis of racism? Stupid, really stupid. Ignorance on display. (Yep you are showing your ignorance.)

Show where the article is wrong.

Sorry, maybe I did not explain that very well.

Making such broad generalizations with a purely partisan political motive is the height of stupidity.

[Tigermike 4,082]

Yea TM. That's write. Them commie racists bastards wood never appoint no minority to the Supreem Court. They is racist thug commie homos who hate America.

Show me a dimocrap libtard and ill show you a racist.

Translation: democrats can't be racist because they care for 'the little people'. democrats can't be racist because they are better than conservatives.

Wrong. The correct translation would be: Yet another heavily biased article posted by TM that has almost nothing to do with reality and everything to do with making a stupid partisan political statement.

Are there Republicans who are racists? Are there Democrats who are racists? Does that make them all racists? Can you make such an asinine generalization as the article does? Well, obviously you can. Should you? Aren't asinine generalizations, in large part, the basis of racism? Stupid, really stupid. Ignorance on display. (Yep you are showing your ignorance.)

Show where the article is wrong.

Sorry, maybe I did not explain that very well.

Making such broad generalizations with a purely partisan political motive is the height of stupidity.

So why do you do it?

Democrats have locked up the black vote for generations not because they’ve solved any problems in the black community – those they’ve attempted to address have done nothing but get worse – but because they’ve cynically, and diabolically injected race into every issue and labeled with “otherness,” anyone who strays from the orthodoxy they’ve deemed “acceptable thought” for black Americans.

In one of the most disgusting displays of recent liberal bigotry, U.S. Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., called Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas an “Uncle Tom” on a radio show for the New Nation Of Islam. Hilariously, the host immediately said, “You said that, I didn’t.” You know it’s bad when the New Nation Of Islam host distances himself from a bigoted comment.

The truth hurts doesn't it.

[icanthearyou 4,468]

Yea TM. That's write. Them commie racists bastards wood never appoint no minority to the Supreem Court. They is racist thug commie homos who hate America.

Show me a dimocrap libtard and ill show you a racist.

Translation: democrats can't be racist because they care for 'the little people'. democrats can't be racist because they are better than conservatives.

Wrong. The correct translation would be: Yet another heavily biased article posted by TM that has almost nothing to do with reality and everything to do with making a stupid partisan political statement.

Are there Republicans who are racists? Are there Democrats who are racists? Does that make them all racists? Can you make such an asinine generalization as the article does? Well, obviously you can. Should you? Aren't asinine generalizations, in large part, the basis of racism? Stupid, really stupid. Ignorance on display. (Yep you are showing your ignorance.)

Show where the article is wrong.

Sorry, maybe I did not explain that very well.

Making such broad generalizations with a purely partisan political motive is the height of stupidity.

So why do you do it?

Democrats have locked up the black vote for generations not because they’ve solved any problems in the black community – those they’ve attempted to address have done nothing but get worse – but because they’ve cynically, and diabolically injected race into every issue and labeled with “otherness,” anyone who strays from the orthodoxy they’ve deemed “acceptable thought” for black Americans.

In one of the most disgusting displays of recent liberal bigotry, U.S. Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., called Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas an “Uncle Tom” on a radio show for the New Nation Of Islam. Hilariously, the host immediately said, “You said that, I didn’t.” You know it’s bad when the New Nation Of Islam host distances himself from a bigoted comment.

The truth hurts doesn't it.

Cause I'm a librul, socialist, dimocrap libtard.

You got me their TM. Dang, you sure is smart.

[Tigermike 4,082]

Care to show where the article is factually wrong?

[icanthearyou 4,468]

Care to show where the article is factually wrong?

Think man, think.

[AUisAll 2]

Yea TM. That's write. Them commie racists bastards wood never appoint no minority to the Supreem Court. They is racist thug commie homos who hate America.

Show me a dimocrap libtard and ill show you a racist.

Translation: democrats can't be racist because they care for 'the little people'. democrats can't be racist because they are better than conservatives.

Wrong. The correct translation would be: Yet another heavily biased article posted by TM that has almost nothing to do with reality and everything to do with making a stupid partisan political statement.

Are there Republicans who are racists? Are there Democrats who are racists? Does that make them all racists? Can you make such an asinine generalization as the article does? Well, obviously you can. Should you? Aren't asinine generalizations, in large part, the basis of racism? Stupid, really stupid. Ignorance on display. (Yep you are showing your ignorance.)

Show where the article is wrong.

Sorry, maybe I did not explain that very well.

Making such broad generalizations with a purely partisan political motive is the height of stupidity.

Sort of like the 'War on Women' and the 'Tea Party are racists' BS spewed by you and the other loons that support the criminals in power right now.

[TheBlueVue 177]

Care to show where the article is factually wrong?

Think man, think.

I'd respond by advising you, ICHY, to take your own advise. You whine ad nauseum about everything posted here that has a conservative lean all the while claiming you're not a democrat. You continuously try to paint everything as partisan. Do you stand for anything or, just everything that isn't conservative?

[icanthearyou 4,468]

Care to show where the article is factually wrong?

Think man, think.

I'd respond by advising you, ICHY, to take your own advise. You whine ad nauseum about everything posted here that has a conservative lean all the while claiming you're not a democrat. You continuously try to paint everything as partisan. Do you stand for anything or, just everything that isn't conservative?

No sir. You are wrong, again. I simply do not believe that Republicans are all good and Democrats are all bad. Believing in the rhetoric of the political left or right obscures what have become inherent problems in the Federal government. If you have followed along for a while, it should be apparent that unconditional loyalty to conservatism or liberalism is foolish. Both the Democrats and the Republicans are openly and unabashedly FOR SALE.

[TheBlueVue 177]

Care to show where the article is factually wrong?

Think man, think.

I'd respond by advising you, ICHY, to take your own advise. You whine ad nauseum about everything posted here that has a conservative lean all the while claiming you're not a democrat. You continuously try to paint everything as partisan. Do you stand for anything or, just everything that isn't conservative?

No sir. You are wrong, again. I simply do not believe that Republicans are all good and Democrats are all bad. Believing in the rhetoric of the political left or right obscures what have become inherent problems in the Federal government. If you have followed along for a while, it should be apparent that unconditional loyalty to conservatism or liberalism is foolish. Both the Democrats and the Republicans are openly and unabashedly FOR SALE.

That whole post is down right silly. Your response is telling me that ALL republicans are n't good? Hell I coulda told you that but I quit criticizing them, as a republican, because everytime I did someone would pop out of the woodwork and take me to task. This is American and EVERYTHING is for sale. You no likely?..Canada beckons.

you are mistaken about this though. Unconditional loyalty to conservative principles will always be better than progressive liberalism. The reason is conservatism, is a way of life, that built this country and has obviously proven it works. By contrast, progressive liberalism is an ideology that has fallen on its face time after time after time and is doing so again as we speak. One is a way of life and the other is a school of thought, maybe you can figure out which one is which.

[AFTiger 282]

ICHY (IDL (i don't listen)) has just show that as a liberal (librul in his language), one need not understand his positions. Just have faith in them.

[Tigermike 4,082]

Care to show where the article is factually wrong?

Think man, think.

I'd respond by advising you, ICHY, to take your own advise. You whine ad nauseum about everything posted here that has a conservative lean all the while claiming you're not a democrat. You continuously try to paint everything as partisan. Do you stand for anything or, just everything that isn't conservative?

No sir. You are wrong, again. I simply do not believe that Republicans are all good and Democrats are all bad. Believing in the rhetoric of the political left or right obscures what have become inherent problems in the Federal government. If you have followed along for a while, it should be apparent that unconditional loyalty to conservatism or liberalism is foolish. Both the Democrats and the Republicans are openly and unabashedly FOR SALE.

Strange isn't it that the author never said ALL dimocrats. He merely gave examples of liberal racism. So if you would like to quit painting with your broad brush, you would look less like a hypocrite and far left loon.

[icanthearyou 4,468]

Care to show where the article is factually wrong?

Think man, think.

I'd respond by advising you, ICHY, to take your own advise. You whine ad nauseum about everything posted here that has a conservative lean all the while claiming you're not a democrat. You continuously try to paint everything as partisan. Do you stand for anything or, just everything that isn't conservative?

No sir. You are wrong, again. I simply do not believe that Republicans are all good and Democrats are all bad. Believing in the rhetoric of the political left or right obscures what have become inherent problems in the Federal government. If you have followed along for a while, it should be apparent that unconditional loyalty to conservatism or liberalism is foolish. Both the Democrats and the Republicans are openly and unabashedly FOR SALE.

Strange isn't it that the author never said ALL dimocrats. He merely gave examples of liberal racism. So if you would like to quit painting with your broad brush, you would look less like a hypocrite and far left loon.

Hey, dumb dumb, what is liberal racism? Do you have some sort of permanent brain injury I need to consider?

[Tigermike 4,082]

Care to show where the article is factually wrong?

Think man, think.

I'd respond by advising you, ICHY, to take your own advise. You whine ad nauseum about everything posted here that has a conservative lean all the while claiming you're not a democrat. You continuously try to paint everything as partisan. Do you stand for anything or, just everything that isn't conservative?

No sir. You are wrong, again. I simply do not believe that Republicans are all good and Democrats are all bad. Believing in the rhetoric of the political left or right obscures what have become inherent problems in the Federal government. If you have followed along for a while, it should be apparent that unconditional loyalty to conservatism or liberalism is foolish. Both the Democrats and the Republicans are openly and unabashedly FOR SALE.

Strange isn't it that the author never said ALL dimocrats. He merely gave examples of liberal racism. So if you would like to quit painting with your broad brush, you would look less like a hypocrite and far left loon.

Hey, dumb dumb, what is liberal racism? Do you have some sort of permanent brain injury I need to consider?

Hey dumbass does it anywhere say all liberals fall into that? No it doesn't, fool.

[icanthearyou 4,468]

Care to show where the article is factually wrong?

Think man, think.

I'd respond by advising you, ICHY, to take your own advise. You whine ad nauseum about everything posted here that has a conservative lean all the while claiming you're not a democrat. You continuously try to paint everything as partisan. Do you stand for anything or, just everything that isn't conservative?

No sir. You are wrong, again. I simply do not believe that Republicans are all good and Democrats are all bad. Believing in the rhetoric of the political left or right obscures what have become inherent problems in the Federal government. If you have followed along for a while, it should be apparent that unconditional loyalty to conservatism or liberalism is foolish. Both the Democrats and the Republicans are openly and unabashedly FOR SALE.

That whole post is down right silly. Your response is telling me that ALL republicans are n't good? Hell I coulda told you that but I quit criticizing them, as a republican, because everytime I did someone would pop out of the woodwork and take me to task. This is American and EVERYTHING is for sale. You no likely?..Canada beckons.

you are mistaken about this though. Unconditional loyalty to conservative principles will always be better than progressive liberalism. The reason is conservatism, is a way of life, that built this country and has obviously proven it works. By contrast, progressive liberalism is an ideology that has fallen on its face time after time after time and is doing so again as we speak. One is a way of life and the other is a school of thought, maybe you can figure out which one is which.

Hey, dumb dumb, the government should NOT be FOR SALE. Do you ever think before you type? EVER?

And one other thing. Conservative values built this country? Really? How do values build anything? Any one value in particular or just all of the "conservative" values? People built this country on the foundation of freedom. Some of those people were good, some bad, some liberal, some conservative, and a whole bunch who didn't really care about politics or religion.

[icanthearyou 4,468]

Care to show where the article is factually wrong?

Think man, think.

I'd respond by advising you, ICHY, to take your own advise. You whine ad nauseum about everything posted here that has a conservative lean all the while claiming you're not a democrat. You continuously try to paint everything as partisan. Do you stand for anything or, just everything that isn't conservative?

No sir. You are wrong, again. I simply do not believe that Republicans are all good and Democrats are all bad. Believing in the rhetoric of the political left or right obscures what have become inherent problems in the Federal government. If you have followed along for a while, it should be apparent that unconditional loyalty to conservatism or liberalism is foolish. Both the Democrats and the Republicans are openly and unabashedly FOR SALE.

Strange isn't it that the author never said ALL dimocrats. He merely gave examples of liberal racism. So if you would like to quit painting with your broad brush, you would look less like a hypocrite and far left loon.

Hey, dumb dumb, what is liberal racism? Do you have some sort of permanent brain injury I need to consider?

Hey dumbass does it anywhere say all liberals fall into that? No it doesn't, fool.

Again, for the impaired, what is liberal racism?

[Tigermike 4,082]

Care to show where the article is factually wrong?

Think man, think.

I'd respond by advising you, ICHY, to take your own advise. You whine ad nauseum about everything posted here that has a conservative lean all the while claiming you're not a democrat. You continuously try to paint everything as partisan. Do you stand for anything or, just everything that isn't conservative?

No sir. You are wrong, again. I simply do not believe that Republicans are all good and Democrats are all bad. Believing in the rhetoric of the political left or right obscures what have become inherent problems in the Federal government. If you have followed along for a while, it should be apparent that unconditional loyalty to conservatism or liberalism is foolish. Both the Democrats and the Republicans are openly and unabashedly FOR SALE.

Strange isn't it that the author never said ALL dimocrats. He merely gave examples of liberal racism. So if you would like to quit painting with your broad brush, you would look less like a hypocrite and far left loon.

Hey, dumb dumb, what is liberal racism? Do you have some sort of permanent brain injury I need to consider?

Hey dumbass does it anywhere say all liberals fall into that? No it doesn't, fool.

Again, for the impaired, what is liberal racism?

Again dumbass are any of the examples provided in the article inaccurate?

You don't like the title. Tough horse apples.

Are any of the examples provided in the article inaccurate?

[icanthearyou 4,468]

Care to show where the article is factually wrong?

Think man, think.

I'd respond by advising you, ICHY, to take your own advise. You whine ad nauseum about everything posted here that has a conservative lean all the while claiming you're not a democrat. You continuously try to paint everything as partisan. Do you stand for anything or, just everything that isn't conservative?

No sir. You are wrong, again. I simply do not believe that Republicans are all good and Democrats are all bad. Believing in the rhetoric of the political left or right obscures what have become inherent problems in the Federal government. If you have followed along for a while, it should be apparent that unconditional loyalty to conservatism or liberalism is foolish. Both the Democrats and the Republicans are openly and unabashedly FOR SALE.

Strange isn't it that the author never said ALL dimocrats. He merely gave examples of liberal racism. So if you would like to quit painting with your broad brush, you would look less like a hypocrite and far left loon.

Hey, dumb dumb, what is liberal racism? Do you have some sort of permanent brain injury I need to consider?

Hey dumbass does it anywhere say all liberals fall into that? No it doesn't, fool.

Again, for the impaired, what is liberal racism?

Again dumbass are any of the examples provided in the article inaccurate?

You don't like the title. Tough horse apples.

Are any of the examples provided in the article inaccurate?

You seem to be having difficulty with the question. If you do not understand the question, just say so. Perhaps I can rephrase the question so that you will be able to understand it. There is no shame in saying, "I don't understand".

[TheBlueVue 177]

Care to show where the article is factually wrong?

Think man, think.

I'd respond by advising you, ICHY, to take your own advise. You whine ad nauseum about everything posted here that has a conservative lean all the while claiming you're not a democrat. You continuously try to paint everything as partisan. Do you stand for anything or, just everything that isn't conservative?

No sir. You are wrong, again. I simply do not believe that Republicans are all good and Democrats are all bad. Believing in the rhetoric of the political left or right obscures what have become inherent problems in the Federal government. If you have followed along for a while, it should be apparent that unconditional loyalty to conservatism or liberalism is foolish. Both the Democrats and the Republicans are openly and unabashedly FOR SALE.

Strange isn't it that the author never said ALL dimocrats. He merely gave examples of liberal racism. So if you would like to quit painting with your broad brush, you would look less like a hypocrite and far left loon.

Hey, dumb dumb, what is liberal racism? Do you have some sort of permanent brain injury I need to consider?

Hey dumbass does it anywhere say all liberals fall into that? No it doesn't, fool.

Again, for the impaired, what is liberal racism?

Again dumbass are any of the examples provided in the article inaccurate?

You don't like the title. Tough horse apples.

Are any of the examples provided in the article inaccurate?

You seem to be having difficulty with the question. If you do not understand the question, just say so. Perhaps I can rephrase the question so that you will be able to understand it. There is no shame in saying, "I don't understand".

It would be most helpful if you would actually read the articles before spouting off a lot of questions that have no bearing on the articles posed

[Tigermike 4,082]

Care to show where the article is factually wrong?

Think man, think.

I'd respond by advising you, ICHY, to take your own advise. You whine ad nauseum about everything posted here that has a conservative lean all the while claiming you're not a democrat. You continuously try to paint everything as partisan. Do you stand for anything or, just everything that isn't conservative?

No sir. You are wrong, again. I simply do not believe that Republicans are all good and Democrats are all bad. Believing in the rhetoric of the political left or right obscures what have become inherent problems in the Federal government. If you have followed along for a while, it should be apparent that unconditional loyalty to conservatism or liberalism is foolish. Both the Democrats and the Republicans are openly and unabashedly FOR SALE.

Strange isn't it that the author never said ALL dimocrats. He merely gave examples of liberal racism. So if you would like to quit painting with your broad brush, you would look less like a hypocrite and far left loon.

Hey, dumb dumb, what is liberal racism? Do you have some sort of permanent brain injury I need to consider?

Hey dumbass does it anywhere say all liberals fall into that? No it doesn't, fool.

Again, for the impaired, what is liberal racism?

Again dumbass are any of the examples provided in the article inaccurate?

You don't like the title. Tough horse apples.

Are any of the examples provided in the article inaccurate?

You seem to be having difficulty with the question. If you do not understand the question, just say so. Perhaps I can rephrase the question so that you will be able to understand it. There is no shame in saying, "I don't understand".

OK I will change the thread title to be more appropriate and accurate.

[TheBlueVue 177]

"Hey, dumb dumb, the government should NOT be FOR SALE. Do you ever think before you type? EVER?

And one other thing. Conservative values built this country? Really? How do values build anything? Any one value in particular or just all of the "conservative" values? People built this country on the foundation of freedom. Some of those people were good, some bad, some liberal, some conservative, and a whole bunch who didn't really care about politics or religion. "

After reading this I would be forced to ask if you even konw what a value is. You do realize that individual accountability is a conservative value, right? You think people were sitting around waiting for the govt to take care them when this country was in its formative years? Smaller govt and, individual accountability alone played a bigger part in this country's success than ANY progressive liberal idea. Like I said..a way of life versus a line of thinking.

Unlike you, I dont believe the govt is for sale literally. Do the "haves" have the ability to impact legislation? Of course, but what makes that any different than any other time in history. There will always be haves and have nots and if you've ever paid attention to the way the world works...the people with the gold make the rules. it is what it is and your whiney idealism to the contrary doesn't amount to anything more than a steaming stinking pile of s***.