Jump to content

Farewell, Colbert Nation


homersapien

Recommended Posts

Made me think of this forum for some reason. :-\

Farewell, Colbert Nation

And Why Is Conservative Comedy Still Unfunny?

After nine years at the helm of The Colbert Report, where he turned his brilliant right-wing persona into a sprawling marketing empire (see your grocery's freezer section), explained super PACs to everyday Americans, enlightened us about divinity, and added "truthiness" to the nation's vocabulary, Stephen Colbert says his farewell to the Colbert Nation this week to become CBS's new Late Night host. (Sans persona.)

For nearly ten years and more than 1,400 episodes, Colbert remained a constantly amusing and insightful part of our national dialogue. "Fans of the show and its indomitable host (only now defeated by the real-life lure of late-night respectability) have good reason to mourn," noted The New Yorker earlier this year, while Salonrecently crowned Colbert "one of the most important figures in U.S. political comedy of all time."

By embracing the absurd and truly embodying it, Colbert has made politics and public policy uproariously funny, while providing much-needed bouts of sanity for devoted news junkies.

His satirical voice won't be gone completely, of course. Colbert's late-night colleague Jon Stewart continues to soldier on with The Daily Show, that show's alumni John Oliver is doing fine work at HBO, while another, Larry Wilmore, readies his turn to take over Colbert's late-night Comedy Central slot.

But there's no denying Colbert's exit from Comedy Central marks a cultural and political milestone of sorts. The exit is disheartening not only because the genuine laughs will be missed, but because Colbert's satirical work has been instrumental in spearheading progressive arguments and critiques for years.

Colbert's departure also reminds us how hollow conservative comedic efforts have been, as they fail to play catch-up in the cultural war of political satire. Humor remains a rhetorical weapon that American conservatives simply cannot harness.

Maybe that's because political comedy usually doesn't work well when it's anchored in seething hatred or even casual contempt, the type that conservatives hold for President Obama. Political satire works best when it's fueled by curiosity, bewilderment, annoyance, and with a dash of self-righteousness mixed in. And for nine years, Colbert has been deftly mixing that cocktail on The Colbert Report.

Indeed, over the last decade Stewart and Colbert emerged as the Mantle and Maris of political satire, revolutionizing the way viewers, especially young ones, consume news. They're two giants whose staffs added DVRs to the liberal arsenal, catching their favorite target, Fox News, in an array of uproarious boutsof hypocrisy, while puncturing their endless bouts of Obama Derangement Syndrome.

Colbert once described his character as a "well-intentioned, poorly informed, high-status idiot." One reason the on-air Colbert has resonated nationwide, of course, is that Fox News is currently filled with closed-minded millionaire hosts who perfectly mirror the buffoonery Colbert projects every week. Colbert has been blessed with cable news doppelgangers (Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, Steve Doocy, etc.) who make The Colbert Reportlaughs entirely authentic. And for liberals, they're who make the guffaws all the more appreciated. (i.e. If you don't laugh, you'll cry.)

It was just over a decade ago that the laughs arrived, and just in time. That's when Stewart's incarnation ofThe Daily Show helped restore bits of progressive sanity, especially in 2002 and 2003, as America launched its misguided invasion of Iraq. At a time when so much of the Beltway press laid down for the Bush administration, Stewart pushed back. And he got big laughs. Yes he was on basic cable, and no he didn't have an especially large national following at the time. But this was obviously prior to the advent of Facebook, Twitter and the explosion of social media. Back then, Stewart, with Colbert later at his side, proved to be a pioneer.

This was a time when there were very few high-profile media voices that progressives could point to and say, 'That's exactly how I feel about the war and about the mainstream media's utter capitulation to the Republican war culture.'

Against all odds, late-night Comedy Central became that voice.

If you've forgotten how oppressive the Bush era was in terms Beltway media critiques, simply recall Colbert's star-making turn as the featured performer at the 2006 White House Correspondents Dinner. Holding court just a few feet away from Bush and before a sea of assembled journalists, Colbert skewered both targets with gleeful abandon; the satire layered on thick.

"Over the last five years, you people were so good -- over tax cuts, WMD intelligence, the effect of global warming. We Americans didn't want to know, and you had the courtesy not to try to find out," chided Colbert.Then he lowered the boom:

Here's how it works: The president makes decisions. He's the decider. The press secretary announces those decisions, and you people of the press type those decisions down. Make, announce, type. Just put 'em through a spell check and go home. Get to know your family again. Make love to your wife. Write that novel you got kicking around in your head. You know, the one about the intrepid Washington reporter with the courage to stand up to the administration. You know--fiction!

The media response to the epic truth-telling? First they mostly ignored him. Then they said he just wasn't funny.

The Washington Post, the longtime guardian of acceptable of Beltway behavior, seemed especially humorless about Colbert's now-classic performance. "The consensus is that President Bush and Bush impersonator Steve Bridges stole Saturday's show -- and Comedy Central host Stephen Colbert's cutting satire fell flat,"wrote the Post's Amy Argetsinger and Roxanne Roberts.

According to Dana Milbank, Colbert "wasn't terribly funny." And Post columnist Richard Cohen was utterly aghast at how "rude" Colbert had been to Bush. It was the comedian's rudeness that utterly rendered his act "not funny" and why he "failed dismally."

For the record, Cohen represented a prime example of a D.C. pundit who not only bought Bush's bogus tale of WMD's in Iraq, but who actively pushed the fabrication in his column. But I'm sure that had nothing to do with Cohen's disdain for Colbert's biting performance, right?

Meanwhile, can you imagine a conservative comedian rattling the Beltway the way Colbert did at that dinner, and the way he's been doing it for nearly a decade? Neither can I. Comedy Central's satirical juggernaut must be driving conservatives to distraction, especially the ones worried about losing the larger pop culture war.

"The right's anger over being comically challenged is made worse by that fact that they so desperately want to be funny," comedian Dean Obeidallah wrote on Daily Beast this year, when humorless Fox News anchors spent days lamenting President Obama's very funny appearance on the Zach Galifianakis web series, "Between Two Ferns." ("Tragic," "Gross," "Dreadful," "Unbearable" was how the unsmiling pundits lambasted Obama's extended bit.)

I doubt we'll ever see a conservative comic, or one of any partisan stripes, deliver the kind of satirical brilliance and insights that Colbert has for the last decade.

Nation, farewell.

http://mediamatters....t-nation/201881

Link to comment
Share on other sites





9 years of what I think is the best satire of the modern era. I'll miss it terribly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess not enough people thought it was great satire. I laughed at it a time or two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess not enough people thought it was great satire. I laughed at it a time or two.

Errrr, you do know why the show is ending, don't you?

Yes.....but this was more fun. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is sad is the number of people who watch those Comedy Central political satire shows as their only news source.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frankly, a lot of the material Colbert worked with is self-parodying:

O'Reilly Draws Comparison Between Belief In Jesus, Man-Made Climate Change

Sixty-five percent of Americans believe in the Gospel version of Jesus Christ's birth, says Bill O'Reilly, more than those that believe in global warming.

On Tuesday's episode of "The O'Reilly Factor," the Fox personality explored that belief schism, asking panelists Julien Musolino, a psychology professor at Rutgers, and Joshua Dubois, a former faith advisor to President Obama, if it's possible for someone to believe in the birth of Jesus and global warming at the same time.

"Professor, people choose to believe," O'Reilly says, addressing Musolino. "It's a choice, it's a conscious choice. You say you're surprised that more people believe in the birth narrative of Jesus that comes from the Bible ... than in global warming.

"But it's a little misleading," O'Reilly continues. "It's not that they don't believe the Earth is getting warmer -- anyone who can read a thermometer knows it is -- they don't believe that it's been proven conclusively that it's because man is doing certain things. ... It's easier to believe in a benevolent God -- the baby Jesus -- than it is in some kind of theory about global warming. It's just easier, isn't it not?"

http://www.huffingto..._n_6342254.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He fits in perfect for Letterman.

I think he is going to be a bore. He stated that he won't be doing his Colbert "character" so I don't really see what else the guy has to offer. At the same time, ANYTHING and I mean ANYTHING (test pattern, video from Mars rovers, etc) would be more entertaining than that tryhard attention whoring untalented assclown at the Tonight Show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He fits in perfect for Letterman.

I think he is going to be a bore. He stated that he won't be doing his Colbert "character" so I don't really see what else the guy has to offer. At the same time, ANYTHING and I mean ANYTHING (test pattern, video from Mars rovers, etc) would be more entertaining than that tryhard attention whoring untalented assclown at the Tonight Show.

Ouch!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...