Liberal Thread Checklist

[Weegle777 78]

1. Immediately discredit the source, unless it is CNN, MSNBC, NPR, or any site that is pro-global warming.

2. Insert laughing emoticon.

3. Establish pseudo-intellectualism by using as many -isms and fallacy arguments as possible.

4. Attempt to belittle other posters by attacking their intelligence.

5. Attempt to "educate" them with much speaking and ridiculous theories.

6. When attempts to "educate" others are unsuccessful, dismiss them as "ignorant".

7. Attack them as an eight year old would with name-calling and more attacks on their intelligence.

8. Congratulate each other with more emoticons, for the supposed victory won.

9. Rinse and repeat.

[WarTim 3,456]

Sadly 100% correct. Poor souls.......

[AUDub 11,131]

Is this thread really necessary?

[cole256 17,039]

You have to be kidding with the laughing icons. This is everybody on this board, but the fact that everybody points fingers at the other side is what's hilarious. It's basically who says who does it first

[quietfan 233]

I'm not going to deny that this often seems the norm for some posters.

...But change the approved news source to Fox, and it applies equally well to many conservative posters.

[AUUSN 823]

Don't forget post awesome MEMEs!

[AUDub 11,131]

Don't forget post awesome MEMEs!

[TitanTiger 20,465]

1. Immediately discredit the source, unless it is CNN, MSNBC, NPR, or any site that is pro-global warming.

2. Insert laughing emoticon.

3. Establish pseudo-intellectualism by using as many -isms and fallacy arguments as possible.

4. Attempt to belittle other posters by attacking their intelligence.

5. Attempt to "educate" them with much speaking and ridiculous theories.

6. When attempts to "educate" others are unsuccessful, dismiss them as "ignorant".

7. Attack them as an eight year old would with name-calling and more attacks on their intelligence.

8. Congratulate each other with more emoticons, for the supposed victory won.

9. Rinse and repeat.

You could just as easily have subbed out the word "conservative" for liberal here, changed out CNN/MSNBC/etc for FoxNews or Townhall.com and the list would still be 100% accurate.

That said, this thread is pointless. As if we need more opportunities to just snipe at the other side.