Hillary dropping in polls now

[cooltigger21 0]

Seems the email scandal is having an effect on the public perception of Hillary. http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/237572-hillary-approval-slips-after-email-scandal

[autigeremt 5,683]

They (liberal feminists) don't care. Unless she gets a real adversary in the primaries she is a shoe in for the party.

[alexava 6,769]

They (liberal feminists) don't care. Unless she gets a real adversary in the primaries she is a shoe in for the party.

she is a shoe in the general too.

[autigeremt 5,683]

They (liberal feminists) don't care. Unless she gets a real adversary in the primaries she is a shoe in for the party.

she is a shoe in the general too.

Unless she faces someone like John Kasich or someone not named yet. Rand would school her but she has the women drooling and they will vote for her like she's Lilly white.

Edited April 3, 2015 by autigeremt

[cooltigger21 0]

They (liberal feminists) don't care. Unless she gets a real adversary in the primaries she is a shoe in for the party.

she is a shoe in the general too.

not hardly. Democrats are desperately trying to find someone to run against her. A strong conservative will mop the floor with her

[Weegle777 63]

Can they not find a native American woman that is half Hispanic to run so that we can knock three more apologies out with one fail swoop?

[alexava 6,769]

They (liberal feminists) don't care. Unless she gets a real adversary in the primaries she is a shoe in for the party.

she is a shoe in the general too.

not hardly. Democrats are desperately trying to find someone to run against her. A strong conservative will mop the floor with her

no such thing.

[cooltigger21 0]

They (liberal feminists) don't care. Unless she gets a real adversary in the primaries she is a shoe in for the party.

she is a shoe in the general too.

not hardly. Democrats are desperately trying to find someone to run against her. A strong conservative will mop the floor with her

no such thing.

We have several in this campaign. There's Walker, Cruz and Paul. Some more may get in. You're no conservative anyway.

[alexava 6,769]

They (liberal feminists) don't care. Unless she gets a real adversary in the primaries she is a shoe in for the party.

she is a shoe in the general too.

not hardly. Democrats are desperately trying to find someone to run against her. A strong conservative will mop the floor with her

no such thing.

We have several in this campaign. There's Walker, Cruz and Paul. Some more may get in. You're no conservative anyway.

wow, how'd you figure that out.

[RunInRed 12,163]

Her path is this simple (pulled from a recent Politico article) ...

If Clinton held the 18 states that have voted Democratic since 1992, winning Florida and its 29 electoral votes would by itself seal a victory.

[autigeremt 5,683]

Her path is this simple (pulled from a recent Politico article) ...

If Clinton held the 18 states that have voted Democratic since 1992, winning Florida and its 29 electoral votes would by itself seal a victory.

And thus continue the destruction of the republic...might even officially end it. But....the writer is correct, and I don't see her being stopped unless someone comes ready to fight for ever vote.

[MDM4AU 280]

Her path is this simple (pulled from a recent Politico article) ...

If Clinton held the 18 states that have voted Democratic since 1992, winning Florida and its 29 electoral votes would by itself seal a victory.

Ifs, buts, candy, etc...

[RunInRed 12,163]

Her path is this simple (pulled from a recent Politico article) ...

If Clinton held the 18 states that have voted Democratic since 1992, winning Florida and its 29 electoral votes would by itself seal a victory.

Ifs, buts, candy, etc...

Blue states + FL, a state the Clintons are extremely popular in (Hillary won the primary by 18pts over Obama in 2008!), = the easiest path of any candidate. Unless, you're telling us the GOP plans to carry NY, Cali, Vermont, Oregon, etc in 2016

[AURaptor 1,113]

I hope the Dems continue to put all their eggs in the Hillary basket.

It'll be hi-larious to see her fail, utterly , once again.

And she will.

[TheBlueVue 177]

I hope the Dems continue to put all their eggs in the Hillary basket.

It'll be hi-larious to see her fail, utterly , once again.

And she will.

What is utterly amazing to me is democrats' excitement over a hack like Hillary winning their nomination when she has never accomplished a damn thing in her entire political life other than being in the center of a bunch of sleazy scandals. She is an unethical self serving influence peddler whose primary concern is accruing power to herself. She's a horrible candidate because she's just an empty pants suit and a horrible campaigner to boot. Jonah Goldberg said it best when he pointed out that "Hillary has 2 comfort zones - deep in a bunker or high on a pedestal and whenever she is dragged out of the former or down from the latter she's totally lost at sea."

[AURaptor 1,113]

Listen to her answer the question...or , more accurately , NOT answer a very simple, direct question.

[TheBlueVue 177]

Listen to her answer the question...or , more accurately , NOT answer a very simple, direct question.

She could have just said...I was a warm body with a pulse who traveled a go-zillion miles. Her fingerprints are on every geopolitical mess around the globe. She will be just as inept as a Pres as she was as SoS.

[Weegle777 63]

God help us if this happens.

[RunInRed 12,163]

One other thought, the GOP is 0-4 in beating Clinton and Obama ...

[AUUSN 823]

Why Hillary Clinton Is Probably Going to Win the 2016 Election

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2015/04/why-hillary-clinton-is-probably-going-to-win.html

[aubearcat 2,082]

One other thought, the GOP is 0-4 in beating Clinton and Obama ...

She does have the Clinton name, however she's not nearly as charismatic as president Clinton or Obama. Both of whom can deliver a speech and sell sand to a Floridian.

[WarTim 3,192]

Hang tough. Help is on the way in 2016 !!!

[cooltigger21 0]

The GOP is 0-4 because of who they have put up as candidates. GHWB broke his no new tax pledge. He made the mistake that so many republican presidents have made. He took the word of the democrats in Congress that they would agree to cut spending if he would agree to new or increased taxes. We got the taxes but never the spending reduction. That was his biggest undoing. They offered Dole, McCain and Romney in the other three elections. They share one trait. They are not conservative in any shape manner or form. Hillary has that cackle for a laugh and she is not likable in the least as a person. Trying to transfer his popularity on to her is a bad mistake. She is also as big of a leftist as they come. She's losing ground in key battleground states and even if nominated she won't win every state Obama won in either election. Lots of democrats are hoping and praying that someone will challenge her for the nomination.

[RunInRed 12,163]

One other thought, the GOP is 0-4 in beating Clinton and Obama ...

She does have the Clinton name, however she's not nearly as charismatic as president Clinton or Obama. Both of whom can deliver a speech and sell sand to a Floridian.

That's a good point.

[TheBlueVue 177]

One other thought, the GOP is 0-4 in beating Clinton and Obama ...

We'll see how much that "helps" Hillary. I suspect there's nothing that can help her change the fact that she is an arrogant elitist bitch with serious attitude of entitlement. How is she going to connect with ordinary people? By her own admission, she hasn't even driven a car in 18 years because the secret service provides her with chariot service 24/7.

Edited April 13, 2015 by TheBlueVue