Jump to content

Petraeus Sentenced To Two Years Probation


Proud Tiger

Recommended Posts

Gen. Petraeus sentenced to two years probation plus fine. He broke the law but IMHO it is a little harsh when there are more than one corrupt civilian involved in recent scandals who isn't being punished at all.

http://www.foxnews.c...-military-leak/

Link to comment
Share on other sites





Gen. Petraeus sentenced to two years probation plus fine. He broke the law but IMHO it is a little harsh when there are more than one corrupt civilian involved in recent scandals who isn't being punished at all.

http://www.foxnews.c...-military-leak/

Prosecuted for not towing the "company" line
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meanwhile in an alternate universe: "Judge sentences Manning, Snowden to probation, a modest fine for sharing secrets with journalists - wishes them luck"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meanwhile in an alternate universe: "Judge sentences Manning, Snowden to probation, a modest fine for sharing secrets with journalists - wishes them luck"

It is hardly fair to hold the DCI to the same standard as a private in the Army and an employee of a private contractor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meanwhile in an alternate universe: "Judge sentences Manning, Snowden to probation, a modest fine for sharing secrets with journalists - wishes them luck"

Letting your mistress who was an academy graduate and intelligence corps major in the U.S. Army Reserve who was after investigations later prompted to LTC read his classified notebooks is not the same as handing over classified information to Wikileaks. Both are wrong, but giving top secret info to Wikileaks is really wrong.

And General Officers really should be able to find better looking mistresses and girlfriends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never said he was innocent or what he did was ok. What I said was he was prosecuted because he didn't tow the administration line on the war. They had all this information long before it was released. They saved it until they found the right time politically to bring it to light.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you want to feel sorry for someone who was actually persecuted by the government, here is a man who, spent his career doing it the right way and lost everything in the process. This is a shameful story.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Andrews_Drake

OUR country owes this man an apology.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meanwhile in an alternate universe: "Judge sentences Manning, Snowden to probation, a modest fine for sharing secrets with journalists - wishes them luck"

Letting your mistress who was an academy graduate and intelligence corps major in the U.S. Army Reserve who was after investigations later prompted to LTC read his classified notebooks is not the same as handing over classified information to Wikileaks. Both are wrong, but giving top secret info to Wikileaks is really wrong.

And General Officers really should be able to find better looking mistresses and girlfriends.

There is no wrong, really wrong, or super duper really wrong when it comes to handling classified material.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The gross hypocrisy in this case knows no bounds. At the same time as Petraeus got off virtually scot-free, the Justice Department has been bringing the hammer down upon other leakers who talk to journalists—sometimes for disclosing information much less sensitive than Petraeus did. It's worth remembering Petraeus' leak was not your run-of-the-mill classified information; it represented some of the most compartmentalized secrets in government."

https://freedom.press/blog/2015/04/david-petraeus-receives-no-jail-time-leaking-while-whistleblowers-face-decades-jail

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The deal has another effect: it all but confirms a two-tier justice system in which senior officials are slapped on the wrist for serious violations while lesser officials are harshly prosecuted for relatively minor infractions.

For instance, last year, after a five-year standoff with federal prosecutors, Stephen Kim, a former State Department official, pleaded guilty to one count of violating the Espionage Act when he discussed a classified report about North Korea with Fox News reporter James Rosen in 2009. Kim did not hand over a copy of the report — he just discussed it, and nothing else — and the report was subsequently described in court documents as a “nothing burger” in terms of its sensitivity. Kim is currently in prison on a 13-month sentence.

“The issue is not whether General Petraeus was dealt with too leniently, because the pleadings indicate good reason for that result,” said Abbe Lowell, who is Kim’s lawyer. “The issue is whether others are dealt with far too severely for conduct that is no different. This underscores the random, disparate and often unfair application of the national security laws where higher-ups are treated better than lower-downs.”

https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/03/03/petraeus-plea-deal-reveals-two-tier-justice-system-leaks/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gen Petraeus...., you made a mistake. We all do. But 99.9% of your service was honorable and I salute you for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gen Petraeus...., you made a mistake. We all do. But 99.9% of your service was honorable and I salute you for that.

He is the man that brought us the surge in Iraq. That alone is worth a salute.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who said giving classified material was his REAL mistake?

That's not against the law.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't say it was. That's the reason a lot of us haven't served jail time

:dunno:

So sharing classified info without authorization isn't the real mistake. OK.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Poe's Law

Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is utterly impossible to parody an wingnut in such a way that someone won't mistake for the genuine article. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who said giving classified material was his REAL mistake?

That's not against the law.

Actually it can be under article 134 of the UCMJ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who said giving classified material was his REAL mistake?

That's not against the law.

Actually it can be under article 134 of the UCMJ.

That'd be cold to charge a retiree. :laugh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...