AFTiger 282 Posted July 1, 2015 Author Share Posted July 1, 2015 Communists do so well with the environment. My argument has not been broken. The government funds AGW research in order to validate its desire to control all aspects of our lives. If research could result in contradicting the government's goal, that research will not be funded. Since so much of the climate money comes from the government, scientists are reluctant to research data that may contradict, no money in that. Better to submit for grants that only promote AGW. That is not science. That is Lysenkoism https://en.wikipedia.../Trofim_Lysenko Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cooltigger21 0 Posted July 1, 2015 Share Posted July 1, 2015 Communists do so well with the environment. My argument has not been broken. The government funds AGW research in order to validate its desire to control all aspects of our lives. If research could result in contradicting the government's goal, that research will not be funded. Since so much of the climate money comes from the government, scientists are reluctant to research data that may contradict, no money in that. Better to submit for grants that only promote AGW. That is not science. That is Lysenkoism https://en.wikipedia.../Trofim_Lysenko Every study funded by a government agency always comes to the point they want. Being in the trucking industry for 20 years has shown me this up close. The DOT has a proposal for a new rule and they do a study and sure enough the study backs their claim. Same way with EPA and any other agency. The people doing the research or study know that if they want future business with the government, they had better come up with a conclusion the government wants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.