cooltigger21 0 Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 Lost in the fanfare of the rulings on Obamacare and Homosexual marriage was the decision in the Texas vs Inclusive communities. Now only statistics that show what is called disparate impact can be used as grounds for proving discrimination. It need not be the intent but only the outcome. This is going to be a nightmare of epic proportions. Once again it was good ole Anthony Kennedy leading the way. http://townhall.com/...racism-n2017953 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homersapien 10,183 Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 Lost in the fanfare of the rulings on Obamacare and Homosexual marriage was the decision in the Texas vs Inclusive communities. Now only statistics that show what is called disparate impact can be used as grounds for proving discrimination. It need not be the intent but only the outcome. This is going to be a nightmare of epic proportions. Once again it was good ole Anthony Kennedy leading the way. http://townhall.com/...racism-n2017953 This is not new. American law has always considered outcome in discrimination cases. As it should. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarTim 3,208 Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 Lost in the fanfare of the rulings on Obamacare and Homosexual marriage was the decision in the Texas vs Inclusive communities. Now only statistics that show what is called disparate impact can be used as grounds for proving discrimination. It need not be the intent but only the outcome. This is going to be a nightmare of epic proportions. Once again it was good ole Anthony Kennedy leading the way. http://townhall.com/...racism-n2017953 Slippery Slope indeed. Thanks for posting! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weagle1787 574 Posted June 28, 2015 Share Posted June 28, 2015 I was wondering about the particulars of this one. Sounds like a bad deal that opens a can of worms I'm not sure the majority is anticipating. Anyone know what the vote was, and who the dissenting votes were? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.