Jump to content

Unfit to lead


TexasTiger

Recommended Posts

OK, you could have explained that instead of confusing the issue. So what's your point again?

The issue didn't need explaining for those who can follow US politics 101.

And you asking me what the point was again, when I've already clearly stated it above, proves it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites





OK, you could have explained that instead of confusing the issue. So what's your point again?

The issue didn't need explaining for those who can follow US politics 101.

And you asking me what the point was again, when I've already clearly stated it above, proves it.

Well I admit I missed it. Your statement implied the Clinton's were in debt followed by a statement about their multi-million net worth, it was confusing.

Sometimes your quips get a little cryptic, at least for those of us who are too dim witted to "keep up". :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, you could have explained that instead of confusing the issue. So what's your point again?

The issue didn't need explaining for those who can follow US politics 101.

And you asking me what the point was again, when I've already clearly stated it above, proves it.

Well I admit I missed it. Your statement implied the Clinton's were in debt followed by a statement about their multi-million net worth, it was confusing.

Sometimes your quips get a little cryptic, at least for those of us who are too dim witted to "keep up". :rolleyes:

*sigh*

"We Came Out Of The White House Dead Broke" - Hillary Clinton

Hillary Clinton Net Worth $21.5 Million

Bill Clinton Net Worth $ 80 Million

Combined Net Worth = $ 101.5 Million

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So your point was:

The Clinton's legal debt (presumably paid-off), because of how it was incurred, is the equivalent to a couple of credit card balances at credit card rates.

Is that close?

If so, how about the equivalence from a financial responsibility standpoint?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, you could have explained that instead of confusing the issue. So what's your point again?

The issue didn't need explaining for those who can follow US politics 101.

And you asking me what the point was again, when I've already clearly stated it above, proves it.

Well I admit I missed it. Your statement implied the Clinton's were in debt followed by a statement about their multi-million net worth, it was confusing.

Sometimes your quips get a little cryptic, at least for those of us who are too dim witted to "keep up". :rolleyes:

*sigh*

"We Came Out Of The White House Dead Broke" - Hillary Clinton

Hillary Clinton Net Worth $21.5 Million

Bill Clinton Net Worth $ 80 Million

Combined Net Worth = $ 101.5 Million

There you go again! :no:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your statement implied the Clinton's were in debt followed by a statement about their multi-million net worth, it was confusing.

Only confusing for those who can't follow along.

I then showed you that this was EXACTLY the case, with quotes and links, making any confusion near impossible.

And yet, some how, you were STILL stumped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your statement implied the Clinton's were in debt followed by a statement about their multi-million net worth, it was confusing.

Only confusing for those who can't follow along.

I then showed you that this was EXACTLY the case, with quotes and links, making any confusion near impossible.

And yet, some how, you were STILL stumped.

Wow. This is fascinating.

I never said it wasn't the case. I don't dispute the Clinton's paid their legal fees with debt. I don't dispute they are worth multi-millions.

I am confused about your point. (see post # 29)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow. This is fascinating.

I never said it wasn't the case. I don't dispute the Clinton's paid their legal fees with debt. I don't dispute they are worth multi-millions.

I am confused about your point. (see post # 29)

That's exactly what you did!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow. This is fascinating.

I never said it wasn't the case. I don't dispute the Clinton's paid their legal fees with debt. I don't dispute they are worth multi-millions.

I am confused about your point. (see post # 29)

That's exactly what you did!

That's BS. Show me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow. This is fascinating.

I never said it wasn't the case. I don't dispute the Clinton's paid their legal fees with debt. I don't dispute they are worth multi-millions.

I am confused about your point. (see post # 29)

That's exactly what you did!

That's BS. Show me.

Already have. You're posting in circles now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow. This is fascinating.

I never said it wasn't the case. I don't dispute the Clinton's paid their legal fees with debt. I don't dispute they are worth multi-millions.

I am confused about your point. (see post # 29)

That's exactly what you did!

That's BS. Show me.

Already have. You're posting in circles now.

No you have not. It should be easy for you to point that out. What post #?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Members Online

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...