AU64 10,122 Posted September 20, 2015 Share Posted September 20, 2015 Still won't hit 100 against bammer. He will unless he gets hurt. does it have to be a hundred ? (or does going over not count) Excellent point So...who get's the most yards against AU this season....Founette, Chubb or Henry....or ???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cole256 17,043 Posted September 21, 2015 Share Posted September 21, 2015 Well they sat founette in like the third right? If he kept playing you have to think he probably gets 300 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
augolf1716 21,103 Posted September 21, 2015 Share Posted September 21, 2015 Still won't hit 100 against bammer. He will unless he gets hurt. does it have to be a hundred ? (or does going over not count) Excellent point So...who get's the most yards against AU this season....Founette, Chubb or Henry....or ???? God I don't want to even think about it just yet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcgufcm 4,096 Posted September 21, 2015 Share Posted September 21, 2015 Fournette. Definitely not Chubb because Michel will get too many carries. Henry is good, but he's not that good. Plus Lane has the most wide-open offense among the three. Alex Collins will have a big day as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcgufcm 4,096 Posted September 26, 2015 Share Posted September 26, 2015 Seriously, Fournette with 244 on 26 carries today. Just less than 9.5 yards per pop. He's a bad man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClaytonAU 4,606 Posted September 26, 2015 Share Posted September 26, 2015 He did it against a horrible defense today. I'm still not impressed.. When he does it against a good defense I'll re-evaluate. 244 yards against the number 3 rush defense in the country. If you don't think he's one of the best RB's in the country you're a lunatic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PoetTiger 1,896 Posted September 26, 2015 Share Posted September 26, 2015 $10 bammer shuts him down. LF won't reach 100 yards in that loss. I will take that 10 and raise you 10....his explosiveness alone could get him a 50 yard gain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUbritt 611 Posted September 26, 2015 Share Posted September 26, 2015 LF is great. Anyone who denies it is flying irregardless of the facts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cooltigger21 0 Posted September 28, 2015 Share Posted September 28, 2015 I wonder if he'll try to challenge the three year rule and try to go pro after this year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keesler 5,924 Posted September 28, 2015 Share Posted September 28, 2015 I wonder if he'll try to challenge the three year rule and try to go pro after this year ?? Is that even possible? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cooltigger21 0 Posted September 28, 2015 Share Posted September 28, 2015 I wonder if he'll try to challenge the three year rule and try to go pro after this year ?? Is that even possible? He can challenge it. As to whether he'd be successful or not, that is another matter entirely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keesler 5,924 Posted September 28, 2015 Share Posted September 28, 2015 I wonder if he'll try to challenge the three year rule and try to go pro after this year ?? Is that even possible? He can challenge it. As to whether he'd be successful or not, that is another matter entirely. Who would he challenge? The NCAA or NFL? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cooltigger21 0 Posted September 28, 2015 Share Posted September 28, 2015 I wonder if he'll try to challenge the three year rule and try to go pro after this year ?? Is that even possible? He can challenge it. As to whether he'd be successful or not, that is another matter entirely. Who would he challenge? The NCAA or NFL? The NFL. It's their rule. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcgufcm 4,096 Posted September 29, 2015 Share Posted September 29, 2015 No way. There's already a federal court ruling affirming the limit. Plus, the last guy that challenged it didn't exactly have a great go of it from that point forward. We'll see Fournette again next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUTUmike 79 Posted September 29, 2015 Share Posted September 29, 2015 Did the fact that Fournette has braces make it sadder for anyone else to watch him run all over our defense? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aujeff11 6,243 Posted September 29, 2015 Share Posted September 29, 2015 Did the fact that Fournette has braces make it sadder for anyone else to watch him run all over our defense? No. Henry should follow suit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cole256 17,043 Posted September 29, 2015 Share Posted September 29, 2015 Did the fact that Fournette has braces make it sadder for anyone else to watch him run all over our defense? Nah but the way he was so polite and humble afterwards did...I felt he would've helped our guys up and told them they were winners because they tried hard, if he was allowed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cooltigger21 0 Posted September 29, 2015 Share Posted September 29, 2015 No way. There's already a federal court ruling affirming the limit. Plus, the last guy that challenged it didn't exactly have a great go of it from that point forward. We'll see Fournette again next year. That was a little different circumstance. Somebody is going to challenge it one day and be successful. Frankly, I think he should be able to go pro if he wants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AU64 10,122 Posted September 29, 2015 Share Posted September 29, 2015 No way. There's already a federal court ruling affirming the limit. Plus, the last guy that challenged it didn't exactly have a great go of it from that point forward. We'll see Fournette again next year. That was a little different circumstance. Somebody is going to challenge it one day and be successful. Frankly, I think he should be able to go pro if he wants. As noted, this involves a labor agreement and courts don't like to get involved with that kind of thing where two parties have come to an agreement they are happy with. The NFL is a union shop and the players union sets rules about their "membership". And guess the other thing is...who is going to finance a law suit against a billion dollar business enterprise? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cooltigger21 0 Posted September 29, 2015 Share Posted September 29, 2015 No way. There's already a federal court ruling affirming the limit. Plus, the last guy that challenged it didn't exactly have a great go of it from that point forward. We'll see Fournette again next year. That was a little different circumstance. Somebody is going to challenge it one day and be successful. Frankly, I think he should be able to go pro if he wants. As noted, this involves a labor agreement and courts don't like to get involved with that kind of thing where two parties have come to an agreement they are happy with. The NFL is a union shop and the players union sets rules about their "membership". And guess the other thing is...who is going to finance a law suit against a billion dollar business enterprise? Until Herschel Walker challenged them, players were unable to leave until after 4 years Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keesler 5,924 Posted September 29, 2015 Share Posted September 29, 2015 No way. There's already a federal court ruling affirming the limit. Plus, the last guy that challenged it didn't exactly have a great go of it from that point forward. We'll see Fournette again next year. That was a little different circumstance. Somebody is going to challenge it one day and be successful. Frankly, I think he should be able to go pro if he wants. As noted, this involves a labor agreement and courts don't like to get involved with that kind of thing where two parties have come to an agreement they are happy with. The NFL is a union shop and the players union sets rules about their "membership". And guess the other thing is...who is going to finance a law suit against a billion dollar business enterprise? Yeah, no one's taking on that expensive ass challenge. Who has the money to go through labor agreements and the federal court system? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cooltigger21 0 Posted September 29, 2015 Share Posted September 29, 2015 No way. There's already a federal court ruling affirming the limit. Plus, the last guy that challenged it didn't exactly have a great go of it from that point forward. We'll see Fournette again next year. That was a little different circumstance. Somebody is going to challenge it one day and be successful. Frankly, I think he should be able to go pro if he wants. As noted, this involves a labor agreement and courts don't like to get involved with that kind of thing where two parties have come to an agreement they are happy with. The NFL is a union shop and the players union sets rules about their "membership". And guess the other thing is...who is going to finance a law suit against a billion dollar business enterprise? Yeah, no one's taking on that expensive ass challenge. Who has the money to go through labor agreements and the federal court system? It will happen at some point. Who will do it or when, I don't know but someone will. There are lawyers out there that would take it for the publicity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcgufcm 4,096 Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 Herschel had to go to a different league. He didn't challenge the rule and win. And no. Clarett wasn't a different circumstance. Those two are almost identically situated. Someone might file suit, but they aren't going to win. It's bordering on a frivolous lawsuit given the Second Circuit decision that was handed down in the Clarett case (overturned Judge Scheindlin's thoughtful decision). With an appellate opinion on point in the home venue for the league, any challenge is up against a massive hurdle. You'll see Fournette in the SEC next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cooltigger21 0 Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 Herschel had to go to a different league. He didn't challenge the rule and win. And no. Clarett wasn't a different circumstance. Those two are almost identically situated. Someone might file suit, but they aren't going to win. It's bordering on a frivolous lawsuit given the Second Circuit decision that was handed down in the Clarett case (overturned Judge Scheindlin's thoughtful decision). With an appellate opinion on point in the home venue for the league, any challenge is up against a massive hurdle. You'll see Fournette in the SEC next year. Yes he will be but eventually it will be changed one way or another. q Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcgufcm 4,096 Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 And that person will lose just like Clarett did. The NFL is on excellent legal footing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.