Fuming Bernie supporters: Why is CNN deleting our comments?

[cooltigger21 0]

Hoover's Policys Failed. FDR's Worked.

Carter's Policys Failed. Reagan's Worked.

Bush-Obama Policys Failed. Maybe it's time to see if Bernie's Work?

Nothing is constant but change.

FDR's new deal recovery never really worked. The US economy started recovering during the 2nd year the US was in WWII. We had 10 million Americans being added to the military forces and millions more became fully employed working in American factories producing for the war efforts of the US, UK, Russia, etc. that strong economy lasted until the early 1970s when Western Europe and Japan had finally recovered from WWII and did not need our production support.

FDR actually made the depression worse. Ironically FDR adopted Hoover's economic policies into the new deal.

http://newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/FDR-s-Policies-Prolonged-Depression-5409

http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/HooversEconomicPolicies.html

When it was all over, I once made a list of New Deal ventures begun during Hoover’s years as Secretary of Commerce and then as president. . . . The New Deal owed much to what he had begun.1 —FDR advisor Rexford G. Tugwell

Many historians, most of the general public, and even many economists think of Herbert Hoover, the president who preceded Franklin D. Roosevelt, as a defender of laissez-faire economic policy. According to this view, Hoover’s dogmatic commitment to small government led him to stand by and do nothing while the economy collapsed in the wake of the 1929 stock market crash. The reality is quite different. Far from being a bystander, Hoover actively intervened in the economy, advocating and implementing polices that were quite similar to those that Franklin Roosevelt later implemented. Moreover, many of Hoover's interventions, like those of his successor, caused the Great Depression to be “great”—that is, to last a long time.

The new deal turned what would have been a tolerable recession, that we had actually started to recover from, and made it the great depression.

[homersapien 11,357]

Hoover's Policys Failed. FDR's Worked.

Carter's Policys Failed. Reagan's Worked.

Bush-Obama Policys Failed. Maybe it's time to see if Bernie's Work?

Nothing is constant but change.

FDR's new deal recovery never really worked. The US economy started recovering during the 2nd year the US was in WWII. We had 10 million Americans being added to the military forces and millions more became fully employed working in American factories producing for the war efforts of the US, UK, Russia, etc. that strong economy lasted until the early 1970s when Western Europe and Japan had finally recovered from WWII and did not need our production support.

FDR actually made the depression worse. Ironically FDR adopted Hoover's economic policies into the new deal.

http://newsroom.ucla...Depression-5409

http://www.econlib.o...icPolicies.html

When it was all over, I once made a list of New Deal ventures begun during Hoover's years as Secretary of Commerce and then as president. . . . The New Deal owed much to what he had begun.1 —FDR advisor Rexford G. Tugwell

Many historians, most of the general public, and even many economists think of Herbert Hoover, the president who preceded Franklin D. Roosevelt, as a defender of laissez-faire economic policy. According to this view, Hoover's dogmatic commitment to small government led him to stand by and do nothing while the economy collapsed in the wake of the 1929 stock market crash. The reality is quite different. Far from being a bystander, Hoover actively intervened in the economy, advocating and implementing polices that were quite similar to those that Franklin Roosevelt later implemented. Moreover, many of Hoover's interventions, like those of his successor, caused the Great Depression to be "great"—that is, to last a long time.

The new deal turned what would have been a tolerable recession, that we had actually started to recover from, and made it the great depression.

Where did you get that idea - the John Birch Society? :-\

https://web.stanford.edu/class/e297c/poverty_prejudice/soc_sec/hgreat.htm

The Great Depression and the New Deal

[icanthearyou 4,462]

Hoover's Policys Failed. FDR's Worked.

Carter's Policys Failed. Reagan's Worked.

Bush-Obama Policys Failed. Maybe it's time to see if Bernie's Work?

Nothing is constant but change.

FDR's new deal recovery never really worked. The US economy started recovering during the 2nd year the US was in WWII. We had 10 million Americans being added to the military forces and millions more became fully employed working in American factories producing for the war efforts of the US, UK, Russia, etc. that strong economy lasted until the early 1970s when Western Europe and Japan had finally recovered from WWII and did not need our production support.

FDR actually made the depression worse. Ironically FDR adopted Hoover's economic policies into the new deal.

http://newsroom.ucla...Depression-5409

http://www.econlib.o...icPolicies.html

When it was all over, I once made a list of New Deal ventures begun during Hoover's years as Secretary of Commerce and then as president. . . . The New Deal owed much to what he had begun.1 —FDR advisor Rexford G. Tugwell

Many historians, most of the general public, and even many economists think of Herbert Hoover, the president who preceded Franklin D. Roosevelt, as a defender of laissez-faire economic policy. According to this view, Hoover's dogmatic commitment to small government led him to stand by and do nothing while the economy collapsed in the wake of the 1929 stock market crash. The reality is quite different. Far from being a bystander, Hoover actively intervened in the economy, advocating and implementing polices that were quite similar to those that Franklin Roosevelt later implemented. Moreover, many of Hoover's interventions, like those of his successor, caused the Great Depression to be "great"—that is, to last a long time.

The new deal turned what would have been a tolerable recession, that we had actually started to recover from, and made it the great depression.

This is sad. Right up there with, "Iran is supporting ISIS".

[DKW 86 7,419]

Hoover's Policys Failed. FDR's Worked.

Carter's Policys Failed. Reagan's Worked.

Bush-Obama Policys Failed. Maybe it's time to see if Bernie's Work?

Nothing is constant but change.

FDR's new deal recovery never really worked. The US economy started recovering during the 2nd year the US was in WWII. We had 10 million Americans being added to the military forces and millions more became fully employed working in American factories producing for the war efforts of the US, UK, Russia, etc. that strong economy lasted until the early 1970s when Western Europe and Japan had finally recovered from WWII and did not need our production support.

FDR actually made the depression worse. Ironically FDR adopted Hoover's economic policies into the new deal.

http://newsroom.ucla...Depression-5409

http://www.econlib.o...icPolicies.html

When it was all over, I once made a list of New Deal ventures begun during Hoover's years as Secretary of Commerce and then as president. . . . The New Deal owed much to what he had begun.1 —FDR advisor Rexford G. Tugwell

Many historians, most of the general public, and even many economists think of Herbert Hoover, the president who preceded Franklin D. Roosevelt, as a defender of laissez-faire economic policy. According to this view, Hoover's dogmatic commitment to small government led him to stand by and do nothing while the economy collapsed in the wake of the 1929 stock market crash. The reality is quite different. Far from being a bystander, Hoover actively intervened in the economy, advocating and implementing polices that were quite similar to those that Franklin Roosevelt later implemented. Moreover, many of Hoover's interventions, like those of his successor, caused the Great Depression to be "great"—that is, to last a long time.

The new deal turned what would have been a tolerable recession, that we had actually started to recover from, and made it the great depression.

This is sad. Right up there with, "Iran is supporting ISIS".

Sometimes you just have to shake you head and go on.

Cant save everyone.

[cooltigger21 0]

You're right DK. Anyone who believes anything Bernie proposes is actually going to help is beyond hope. As for homes here, government is the answer to anything. that tells me all I need to know. http://newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/FDR-s-Policies-Prolonged-Depression-5409

[AUDub 11,141]

You're right DK. Anyone who believes anything Bernie proposes is actually going to help is beyond hope. As for homes here, government is the answer to anything. that tells me all I need to know. http://newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/FDR-s-Policies-Prolonged-Depression-5409

He's talking about your historical revisionism, you silly, silly man.

[homersapien 11,357]

Ole Bernie's Supporters just need to stay home and sit this election out. All the dems running will be replaced with younger candidates next election for them to vote for then.

I take it that you do not care for older people, young people supporting older people, or democracy. Interesting.

#discouragevoting

new ideas are needed. I also don't think people in their 70s should be in that job. Private business normally make CEOs step down for the same reason. The federal government has too many elderly people in positions or power now.

Yeah, God forbid we elect a person with experience. :-\/>

You underestimate the value of wisdom (experience) and overestimate the value of "new ideas". The last "new idea" was trickle-down (supply side) economics, deregulation and shrinking the government (except for the military of course).

And here we are.

The problem is we aren't smart enough to try what seems to have worked in the past.

We are plagued by a handful of zealots. They were born of congressional districts that are so conservative that their zealotry is what keeps them in power. They feel no other responsibility but furthering their articles of faith. And it doesn't take many zealots to sabotage the government in our system.

homer, there is an unlimited number of zealots on both sides. Trust me on this one.

Sure, never said otherwise.

But I was referring to the members of the so called "Freedom Caucus". The ones who created the current turmoil in the GOP.

.

Turmoil? Meaning certain representatives want to represent their districts as intended by the founders and not large donors? Some of those donors also give equally to both parties and the donors don't even live in the state or district.

I suppose that's one way of spinning it.