StatTiger 3,188 Posted October 25, 2015 Share Posted October 25, 2015 Though the defense finished with a failing grade, the Auburn defense held the Razorbacks to 357-yards and 24 points by the end of regulation. This was the kind of production I was hoping to see, when I picked Auburn to win the game, 27-24. After gaining 213-yards during the first half on 5.9 yards per play, Arkansas was held to 144-yards on 5.1 yards per play during the second-half. It wasn't a great performance but on the road against a SEC opponent, it was good enough to win during regulation. The Razorbacks came into the game averaging 433-yards per game, so the defense held Arkansas below their season average until overtime. Sadly, the game should have never gone to overtime. With 8 dropped passes by the Auburn wide receivers, 1 dropped interception and failing to recover 2 fumbles, Auburn failed to capitalize on their opportunities. Even in overtime, Auburn's defense could not finish out the game on two fourth-down plays and two 2-point conversions. Good teams tend to cash in on the majority of these opportunities but this is not a good football team. The offense appears to be improving but the defense continues to struggle getting off the field. Sean White played very well but his wide receivers had more drops in one game than I can recall ever happening to an Auburn pass-offense. The offense went "3 & out" on 5 of their 10 regulation possessions, primarily because of the dropped passes that negated about 150-yards of offense. The other issue was Gus Malzahn's stubbornness to run the ball 21 of 23 times during regulation. Auburn averaged 2.47 yards per rush on first-down during regulation. After throwing the football 31% of the time on first-down vs. Kentucky, the Arkansas game was the perfect opponent to continue this trend. The Razorbacks came into the game as one of the worst pass-defenses on 1st down in the country and Malzahn elected not to take advantage of it. I understand the logic of kicking the PAT after the second overtime TD but at the time, I was hoping to go for 2-pts and the win. After seeing Auburn's first 2-pt conversion on the 3rd OT TD (Great play and execution), I really wished Auburn ran it the TD before. Game #7 Statistical Evaluation (Arkansas Game) Offensive Report Card 01) Avg 6-yards per play on 1st down: [3.94] fail 02) Convert at least 40% of 3rd downs: [47.0%] pass 03) Avg at least 4.5 yards per rush: [3.11] fail 04) Score on at least 1/3 of possessions: [40.0%] pass 05) Keep 3 and out series under 33%: [50.0%] fail 06) Average 8.0 yards per pass attempt: [7.47 yds] fail 07) Score at least 75% inside red zone: [100.0%] pass 08) TD red zone above 60%: [100.0%] pass 09) Avg at least 30-yards per possession: [34.0 yds] pass 10) 40% of offensive snaps part of scoring drives: [69.2%] pass 11) TD / Turnover ratio above 1.6: [3 /0] pass 12) TD ratio of at least 1 every 17 snaps: [22.7] fail 13) At least 8 impact plays: [7] fail 14) At least 2 big plays: [1] fail 15) Pass rating of at least 126.3: [118.6] fail Score: 7 of 15 (46.7%) Fail Defensive Report Card: 01) Avg under 6-yards per play on 1st down: [6.55] fail 02) Convert below 35% of 3rd downs: [56.2%] fail 03) Avg at least 4.0 yards per rush or less: [4.35] fail 04) Score 1/3 of possessions or below: [40.0%] fail 05) Keep 3 and out series above 33%: [10.0%] fail 06) Average below 7.5 yards per pass attempt: [7.62 yds] fail 07) Score below 75% inside red zone: [100.0%] fail 08) TD red zone below 60%: [83.3%] fail 09) Avg under 30-yards per possession: [35.7 yds] fail 10) Less than 40% of offensive snaps part of scoring drives: [57.8%] fail 11) TD / Turnover ratio below 1.6: [3 / 1] fail 12) TD ratio of at least 1 every 30 snaps: [21.3] fail 13) Less than 8 impact plays: [8] fail 14) No more than 2 big plays allowed: [0] pass 15) Pass rating below 125.0: [151.2] fail Score: 1 of 15 (6.7%) Fail Special Teams Report Card: 1) Punt Average (Above 41.3): [36.2] 1/6 inside 20 (fail) 2) Punt Return Defense (Below 7.8 YPR): [4.0] pass 3) Punt Return Offense (Above 9.8 YPR): [0.0] fail 4) Kick-Return Defense (Below 21.2 YPR): [7.0] pass 5) Kick-Return Offense (Above 22.3 YPR): [27.0] pass 6) PAT’s (100%): [5 of 5] pass 7) FG Pct (75% or above): [1/1] pass Score: 5 of 7 (71.4%) pass * Keep in mind that above 50% is a passing score. War Eagle! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TigerOne 1,113 Posted October 25, 2015 Share Posted October 25, 2015 ouch..lost opportunities maybe the dropped balls made Gus gun shy, which plays into his fault of going conservative and predictable when he should step on the gas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinForAuburn 128 Posted October 25, 2015 Share Posted October 25, 2015 I just have no idea how you do yourself any favors running on first down that much. I would think 50% of play calling would be to make your opponent guess whether you are running or passing. We may as well just send them a fax with the game play on first down. I do not understand it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AURealist 2,185 Posted October 25, 2015 Share Posted October 25, 2015 After throwing the football 31% of the time on first-down vs. Kentucky, the Arkansas game was the perfect opponent to continue this trend. The Razorbacks came into the game as one of the worst pass-defenses on 1st down in the country and Malzahn elected not to take advantage of it. Yeah. Well... There was I time I'd have thought Malzahn "elected not to take advantage of it", but I'm now convinced that simple obvious things like this just don't occur to the man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AuburnSpider 2 Posted October 25, 2015 Share Posted October 25, 2015 Wow, you really feel like this is "not a good football team". Wow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
au_bsci_04 407 Posted October 25, 2015 Share Posted October 25, 2015 14) No more than 2 big plays allowed: [0] pass I know this is our only Defensive "point", but I distinctly remember the graphic during the game indicated impact plays. We had none, and they had 3 (all pass plays). I think that was 1st half, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikey 16,461 Posted October 25, 2015 Share Posted October 25, 2015 Wow, you really feel like this is "not a good football team". Wow Do you think this is a good football team? Since we're dead last in the SEC West and probably not going to win enough games to go to a bowl, I'd say "not a good team" is an accurate description. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdamsHouseCat 43 Posted October 25, 2015 Share Posted October 25, 2015 TV announcers also pointed out how we were always ran the ball predictably on first down, and that Arkansas was selling out to stop the same. This put us behind the sticks (2nd and long) all day long. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StatTiger 3,188 Posted October 25, 2015 Author Share Posted October 25, 2015 14) No more than 2 big plays allowed: [0] pass I know this is our only Defensive "point", but I distinctly remember the graphic during the game indicated impact plays. We had none, and they had 3 (all pass plays). I think that was 1st half, too. For my report card, impact plays are plays of 15-yds or more and big plays are plays of 30-yds or more. The graphic you saw was in reference to what they called "chunk" plays or plays of 20-yards or more, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CR 2,408 Posted October 25, 2015 Share Posted October 25, 2015 Malzahn had the reputation coming to AU as a wide open offense kind of guy(deserved or not). But watching him call a game reminds you more of a Dye/Tuberville 2 yds and a cloud of dust, don't make mistakes type of game. Hard to believe the same coach from last years' Bama game can call the same play time after time on 1st down and expect good things to happen. I just don't understand putting a young QB in constant 2nd and 3rd and longs due to poor production on 1st down. And White played great today in spite of this predictability on 1st down. Hats off to him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hutchids 227 Posted October 25, 2015 Share Posted October 25, 2015 Though the defense finished with a failing grade, the Auburn defense held the Razorbacks to 357-yards and 24 points by the end of regulation. This was the kind of production I was hoping to see, when I picked Auburn to win the game, 27-24. After gaining 213-yards during the first half on 5.9 yards per play, Arkansas was held to 144-yards on 5.1 yards per play during the second-half. It wasn't a great performance but on the road against a SEC opponent, it was good enough to win during regulation. The Razorbacks came into the game averaging 433-yards per game, so the defense held Arkansas below their season average until overtime. Sadly, the game should have never gone to overtime. With 8 dropped passes by the Auburn wide receivers, 1 dropped interception and failing to recover 2 fumbles, Auburn failed to capitalize on their opportunities. Even in overtime, Auburn's defense could not finish out the game on two fourth-down plays and two 2-point conversions. Good teams tend to cash in on the majority of these opportunities but this is not a good football team. The offense appears to be improving but the defense continues to struggle getting off the field. Sean White played very well but his wide receivers had more drops in one game than I can recall ever happening to an Auburn pass-offense. The offense went "3 & out" on 5 of their 10 regulation possessions, primarily because of the dropped passes that negated about 150-yards of offense. The other issue was Gus Malzahn's stubbornness to run the ball 21 of 23 times during regulation. Auburn averaged 2.47 yards per rush on first-down during regulation. After throwing the football 31% of the time on first-down vs. Kentucky, the Arkansas game was the perfect opponent to continue this trend. The Razorbacks came into the game as one of the worst pass-defenses on 1st down in the country and Malzahn elected not to take advantage of it. I understand the logic of kicking the PAT after the second overtime TD but at the time, I was hoping to go for 2-pts and the win. After seeing Auburn's first 2-pt conversion on the 3rd OT TD (Great play and execution), I really wished Auburn ran it the TD before. Game #7 Statistical Evaluation (Arkansas Game) Offensive Report Card 01) Avg 6-yards per play on 1st down: [3.94] fail 02) Convert at least 40% of 3rd downs: [47.0%] pass 03) Avg at least 4.5 yards per rush: [3.11] fail 04) Score on at least 1/3 of possessions: [40.0%] pass 05) Keep 3 and out series under 33%: [50.0%] fail 06) Average 8.0 yards per pass attempt: [7.47 yds] fail 07) Score at least 75% inside red zone: [100.0%] pass 08) TD red zone above 60%: [100.0%] pass 09) Avg at least 30-yards per possession: [34.0 yds] pass 10) 40% of offensive snaps part of scoring drives: [69.2%] pass 11) TD / Turnover ratio above 1.6: [3 /0] pass 12) TD ratio of at least 1 every 17 snaps: [22.7] fail 13) At least 8 impact plays: [7] fail 14) At least 2 big plays: [1] fail 15) Pass rating of at least 126.3: [118.6] fail Score: 7 of 15 (46.7%) Fail Defensive Report Card: 01) Avg under 6-yards per play on 1st down: [6.55] fail 02) Convert below 35% of 3rd downs: [56.2%] fail 03) Avg at least 4.0 yards per rush or less: [4.35] fail 04) Score 1/3 of possessions or below: [40.0%] fail 05) Keep 3 and out series above 33%: [10.0%] fail 06) Average below 7.5 yards per pass attempt: [7.62 yds] fail 07) Score below 75% inside red zone: [100.0%] fail 08) TD red zone below 60%: [83.3%] fail 09) Avg under 30-yards per possession: [35.7 yds] fail 10) Less than 40% of offensive snaps part of scoring drives: [57.8%] fail 11) TD / Turnover ratio below 1.6: [3 / 1] fail 12) TD ratio of at least 1 every 30 snaps: [21.3] fail 13) Less than 8 impact plays: [8] fail 14) No more than 2 big plays allowed: [0] pass 15) Pass rating below 125.0: [151.2] fail Score: 1 of 15 (6.7%) Fail Special Teams Report Card: 1) Punt Average (Above 41.3): [36.2] 1/6 inside 20 (fail) 2) Punt Return Defense (Below 7.8 YPR): [4.0] pass 3) Punt Return Offense (Above 9.8 YPR): [0.0] fail 4) Kick-Return Defense (Below 21.2 YPR): [7.0] pass 5) Kick-Return Offense (Above 22.3 YPR): [27.0] pass 6) PAT’s (100%): [5 of 5] pass 7) FG Pct (75% or above): [1/1] pass Score: 5 of 7 (71.4%) pass * Keep in mind that above 50% is a passing score. War Eagle! defense a dumpster fire again, who could have guessed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GBAU83 212 Posted October 25, 2015 Share Posted October 25, 2015 Predictability on first down. If we through more on Kentucky on first down succesfully, then yes, you think we would use that against Arky. But after the dropped passes, maybe a bit gunshy. Plus then Arky might be expecting it and the run would work (part of the chess match). First overtime possession we ran it three times right of the middle for 15, 8 and 2yd TD. So it did work at times. But would have been nice to see something different when they were stopping it during the game., Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AuburnSpider 2 Posted October 25, 2015 Share Posted October 25, 2015 Mikey your as sharp as a tac. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dual-Threat Rigby 8,563 Posted October 25, 2015 Share Posted October 25, 2015 I seriously don't understand how receivers couldn't catch, remembered how to catch, and then forgot how to catch again. Very odd. Running on the first down just simply was dumb because it was usually the same play as the past three years. Does Gus not think others watch film? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aubaseball 2,536 Posted October 25, 2015 Share Posted October 25, 2015 Dont get me wrong, i would love to see more throws on first. But, if he continues to call a run play, how about we at least change the play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bikeriderga 134 Posted October 25, 2015 Share Posted October 25, 2015 TAMU looked awful tonight against Ole Miss, but Ole Miss does have a defense. I don't see us anyway we beat Ole Miss unless Carl Lawson is back. That will at least give me some hope. Otherwise, get ready for a beat down. Our offensive receivers definitely let us down, today. However, offensively, we can at least play with Ole Miss. Defensively, the only teams we may be able to play with is this year's Missou team and Vandy in the SEC. That's about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DunderMifflin 60 Posted October 25, 2015 Share Posted October 25, 2015 On the first down runs it seems like Gus is almost saying, "just run this in the name of 'pace' while I figure out what we want to really run." I believe he looks at it like a boxer hitting them with a body blow over and over each time until they soften up. What be does has usually worked over the years, so it is hard to question the guy too much. But you are handing your opponent your playbook on an all important down and making it where you have two downs to get 10 yds instead of three. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AU64 10,122 Posted October 25, 2015 Share Posted October 25, 2015 I think Gus is a believer in "execution".....even if a team knows the play he is running his team should be able to run it successfully. A good theory perhaps...but not very practical in the SEC. Arky had more imaginative play calling than did AU did for most of the game...who would have ever thought that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUbritt 611 Posted October 25, 2015 Share Posted October 25, 2015 Stat, if it does (and I think it does), why does the Report Card include the overtime stats? I'd be interested to see whether the D failed in regulation. If the RC doesn't include the overtime stats, then I just misunderstood. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lala 327 Posted October 25, 2015 Share Posted October 25, 2015 I think Gus is a believer in "execution".....even if a team knows the play he is running his team should be able to run it successfully. A good theory perhaps...but not very practical in the SEC. Arky had more imaginative play calling than did AU did for most of the game...who would have ever thought that? I hate the zone read with this group. SW is no Cam or Nick running the ball which is fine, so run something else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUbritt 611 Posted October 25, 2015 Share Posted October 25, 2015 I think Gus is a believer in "execution".....even if a team knows the play he is running his team should be able to run it successfully. A good theory perhaps...but not very practical in the SEC. Arky had more imaginative play calling than did AU did for most of the game...who would have ever thought that? I think you may be on to something here, 64. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gr82b4au 5,568 Posted October 25, 2015 Share Posted October 25, 2015 Our receivers dropped all of those passes and you are asking why Gus is running it so much? What else did you expect him to do? They could not catch the ball. He tried everybody. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PigskinPat 2,538 Posted October 25, 2015 Share Posted October 25, 2015 Our receivers dropped all of those passes and you are asking why Gus is running it so much? What else did you expect him to do? They could not catch the ball. He tried everybody. It's not like after 5 dropped passes he stopped running pass plays altogether. I think what most are saying is if Arky was so poor against the pass and we are so painfully predictable on first down, why not call some of those pass plays in first down situations? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AU-24 3,063 Posted October 25, 2015 Share Posted October 25, 2015 "Good teams tend to cash in on the majority of these opportunities but this is not a good football team" ^ To be honest, I have been struggling to figure out what is wrong with this team. I think Stat just summed it up with his quote above. ^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cooltigger21 0 Posted October 25, 2015 Share Posted October 25, 2015 I think Gus is a believer in "execution".....even if a team knows the play he is running his team should be able to run it successfully. A good theory perhaps...but not very practical in the SEC. Arky had more imaginative play calling than did AU did for most of the game...who would have ever thought that? I don't think in 2013 we surprised people with the play calling. The players just executed it better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.