Charlie Rose and the mainstream media still defending Hillary.

[AURaptor 1,113]

"You called Hillary Clinton a liar."

"Well," Rubio responded, "I said Hillary Clinton lied about Benghazi. There's no doubt about that, Charlie. I mean, there are emails in which she was talking to her family and she was telling them that there was an attack on that consulate that was due to a terrorist attack by al Qaeda elements, and then she was going around the country, talking to the families of the victims and to the American people, saying, No, no, this is because [of a video]."

Rose stood up for Clinton by blaming the CIA. But Rubio insisted that the intelligence had been clear all along -- and that Clinton had not been telling the truth.

http://m.weeklystand...io_1055263.html

If Hillary or Obama were unclear as to the intel and specifics, they should have SAID so. But instead, they put Susan Rice on 5 Sunday morning talk shows to pitch a well rehearsed and carefully crafted fairy tale about a Youtube video , and perpetuated this LIE for almost 2 weeks.

Even made a PSA about it !!

[homersapien 10,273]

The media is supposed to challenge whatever position or claim is being made by the interviewee. That's their job.

If anything, he allowed Rubio to make his case even more emphatically because of it.

[autigeremt 5,842]

The media is supposed to challenge whatever position or claim is being made by the interviewee. That's their job.

If anything, he allowed Rubio to make his case even more emphatically because of it.

True, but come on! The questioning sounded like talking points until the panel ganged up on the CNBC hosts. It was pretty clear that they had an objective and it backfired on them.

[homersapien 10,273]

The media is supposed to challenge whatever position or claim is being made by the interviewee. That's their job.

If anything, he allowed Rubio to make his case even more emphatically because of it.

True, but come on! The questioning sounded like talking points until the panel ganged up on the CNBC hosts. It was pretty clear that they had an objective and it backfired on them.

I don't think that clip had anything to do with the debate. Seemed to be just an interview.

[autigeremt 5,842]

The media is supposed to challenge whatever position or claim is being made by the interviewee. That's their job.

If anything, he allowed Rubio to make his case even more emphatically because of it.

True, but come on! The questioning sounded like talking points until the panel ganged up on the CNBC hosts. It was pretty clear that they had an objective and it backfired on them.

I don't think that clip had anything to do with the debate. Seemed to be just an interview.

oops...wrong thread. lol

[AURaptor 1,113]

The media is supposed to challenge whatever position or claim is being made by the interviewee. That's their job.

If anything, he allowed Rubio to make his case even more emphatically because of it.

No, the job of the media isn't to blindly defend a candidate who has admittedly lied, it's to ask questions. Rose acted as if this was the first time he'd ever heard of such a thing ( and that may very well be the case, but it's been widely discussed in the public arena ) and even indignant that Rubio would dare to impugn the integrity of Hillary or the Obama administration.

[AURaptor 1,113]

More than half of Clinton’s emails have now been made publicly available.

Friday's release also included 268 messages that have been classified since they were sent, bringing the total number from her private server that have been upgraded to that status to 671. She's stressed that none were marked classified at the time they were sent. All but four are marked "confidential,’’ which is the lowest-level classification. None were marked top secret.

http://www.msn.com/e...id=ansmsnnews11

It makes zero difference if they were marked classified " at the time they were sent ". That's just more Clintoneese " that depends on the definition of what IS is " double speak.

[AURaptor 1,113]

HILLARY CLINTON WAS WARNED NOT TO BLAME BENGHAZI ON YOUTUBE VIDEO

Then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s embassy in Tripoli, Libya, warned State Department officials in Washington, D.C., not to blame the Youtube video, Innocence of Muslims, for the Benghazi terrorist attack.

The House Benghazi Committee released a new email Saturday that a Tripoli embassy official sent to Clinton’s underlings in Washington, D.C., on September 14, 2012, two days before Susan Rice appeared on Sunday talk shows to use the administration’s “video” talking point.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/10/31/hillary-clinton-warned-not-blame-benghazi-youtube-video/

[AU_Tiger_88 416]

More than half of Clinton’s emails have now been made publicly available.

Friday's release also included 268 messages that have been classified since they were sent, bringing the total number from her private server that have been upgraded to that status to 671. She's stressed that none were marked classified at the time they were sent. All but four are marked "confidential,’’ which is the lowest-level classification. None were marked top secret.

http://www.msn.com/e...id=ansmsnnews11

It makes zero difference if they were marked classified " at the time they were sent ". That's just more Clintoneese " that depends on the definition of what IS is " double speak.

If she didn't don't Foreign Government Information isn't classified and she was passing it on an unclass email server then she has no business being the president. That is beyond dumb to have that classified information on an unclass server. She has no excuse for this due to her position at the time. She had authority to classify things due to her position. SO it is very easy to conclude that she doesn't think the rules apply to her or her staff that was passing around that information. Anyone care to take up that argument on her behalf? If you think she was good to go in doing what she did with classified email, either you don't know anything about classified information or you are just for her no matter what she does. I have seen people lose their clearance for less.

[AURaptor 1,113]

We'll never know the full story, especially because the MSM would cover for her, but i keep hearing how her server was most definitely hacked. multiple times. My GUESS is that , secretly , the Obama admin is FURIOUS with her,but because of politics, will let it all slide.

Party over country , is the Dems motto, after all.

[DKW 86 6,575]

The media is supposed to challenge whatever position or claim is being made by the interviewee. That's their job.

If anything, he allowed Rubio to make his case even more emphatically because of it.

homer, can you give us the link to where HRC was challenged forcefully about how the video story was a lie or at the very least extremely misleading?

While i can agree with a you modst than most on some items, this is where i part. I will likely go and vote HRC next November. That still doesn't mean that i wont be holding my nose over the "video bullstuff." There has never been one of the MSM every held her to the fire about all that these emails prove was BS.

[homersapien 10,273]

The media is supposed to challenge whatever position or claim is being made by the interviewee. That's their job.

If anything, he allowed Rubio to make his case even more emphatically because of it.

homer, can you give us the link to where HRC was challenged forcefully about how the video story was a lie pr at the very least extremely misleading?

While i can agree with a you mosr than most on some items, this is where i part. I will likely go and vote HRC next November. That still doesnt mean that i wont be holding my nose over the "video bullstuff." There has never been one of the MSM every hold her to the fire about all that these emails prove was BS.

What link? I never mentioned such a link. I don't know what direct interviews she has given, but the news is certainly full of reports of such questions posed from the many investigations.

[AURaptor 1,113]

I think DKW is asking if Hillary has EVER been challenged by the MSM or in any debate about the inconsistency of her story, about the 2 + week charade of it being all about a video, to the e-mails revealing that , on the very night of the attack, she KNEW it wasn't.