Jump to content

Negative Recruiting -- interesting read


Tiger

Recommended Posts

On ESPN. I thought this was the best place to put it:

http://espn.go.com/c...ting-alive-well

Thoughts on negative recruiting? How would you negatively recruit each school in the SEC West? There's more than enough material on this site to negatively recruit AU lol

Link to comment
https://www.aufamily.com/topic/149870-negative-recruiting-interesting-read/
Share on other sites





My post is dripping with sarcasm, but here goes:

Bammer-Because of the 85%ers, you will be dumber when you leave there

LSU-I hope you like corndogs

Ole Miss-You will never win a championship, because, well, they're Ole Miss

Miss St-If you can't win a championship at Ole Miss, you dang sure won't win one at Miss State

Arky-The good news, you get to see Bert's wife on a regular basis. The bad news, you have to see Bert everyday.

TAMU-No Manziel, no winning

I'm not going to do AU because you cannot possibly say anything negative about AU.

Heck, if I was recruiting for a school, I'd just be ready pass the URL for my rivals message boards to anyone I'm recruiting. 10 minutes on most of these sites would be enough negative recruiting for most kids. Anyone who came here would think Gus only has 1 year unless he wins 10, he's forgotten how to coach offense, we have no quarterbacks, we can't compete with any of our rivals, our AD is a mess, and our stadium sucks and will never get better. On the good side, they'll learn that we have pretty girls and the alumni/fans love their university.

On ESPN. I thought this was the best place to put it:

http://espn.go.com/c...ting-alive-well

Thoughts on negative recruiting? How would you negatively recruit each school in the SEC West? There's more than enough material on this site to negatively recruit AU lol

I don't believe in it & wouldn't do it. I'd be confident as hell I could sell myself, the school I work for & the academics.

Just one question:

To be a good negative recruiter, is necessary to tell the truth or can you just repeat gossip and rumors about the wives and mistresses of opposing coaches? :dunno:

Just one question:

To be a good negative recruiter, is necessary to tell the truth or can you just repeat gossip and rumors about the wives and mistresses of opposing coaches? :dunno:

I'm sure they lie. I know Troop n' Lupe did.
Some people still believe that ole miss has done everything cleanly under Freeze. Hugh Freeze isn't getting his players because he tells them he loves them and sings kumbaya with them.

We may be cheating ourselves but it's definitely not near as conspicuous as Ole Miss.

Some people still believe that ole miss has done everything cleanly under Freeze. Hugh Freeze isn't getting his players because he tells them he loves them and sings kumbaya with them.

We may be cheating ourselves but it's definitely not near as conspicuous as Ole Miss.

Agree. I think Ole Miss gets a lot of grace because everyone loves Freeze. I don't believe Freeze was involved with this, but it still doesn't look good for their program.

http://sports.yahoo....mail&soc_trk=ma

I bet schools use this as fodder.

Some people still believe that ole miss has done everything cleanly under Freeze. Hugh Freeze isn't getting his players because he tells them he loves them and sings kumbaya with them.

We may be cheating ourselves but it's definitely not near as conspicuous as Ole Miss.

Wardamneaglewde certainly believes OM is cheating on a whole other level.

http://sports.yahoo....mail&soc_trk=ma

I bet schools use this as fodder.

Some people still believe that ole miss has done everything cleanly under Freeze. Hugh Freeze isn't getting his players because he tells them he loves them and sings kumbaya with them.

We may be cheating ourselves but it's definitely not near as conspicuous as Ole Miss.

Wardamneaglewde certainly believes OM is cheating on a whole other level.

So which is it....OM cheating .....or the REC up to its usual tricks? what are the odds......50:50?

http://sports.yahoo....mail&soc_trk=ma

I bet schools use this as fodder.

Some people still believe that ole miss has done everything cleanly under Freeze. Hugh Freeze isn't getting his players because he tells them he loves them and sings kumbaya with them.

We may be cheating ourselves but it's definitely not near as conspicuous as Ole Miss.

Wardamneaglewde certainly believes OM is cheating on a whole other level.

So which is it....OM cheating .....or the REC up to its usual tricks? what are the odds......50:50?

I believe he indicated it was bama and OM that were cheating in ways that could never be found out.

Just one question:

To be a good negative recruiter, is necessary to tell the truth or can you just repeat gossip and rumors about the wives and mistresses of opposing coaches? :dunno:

In this scenario, you probably say all of the above and hope a seed of doubt is planted about rival school. Just a guess of course.

http://sports.yahoo....mail&soc_trk=ma

I bet schools use this as fodder.

Some people still believe that ole miss has done everything cleanly under Freeze. Hugh Freeze isn't getting his players because he tells them he loves them and sings kumbaya with them.

We may be cheating ourselves but it's definitely not near as conspicuous as Ole Miss.

Wardamneaglewde certainly believes OM is cheating on a whole other level.

So which is it....OM cheating .....or the REC up to its usual tricks? what are the odds......50:50?

Well, if the NCAA found something then the cheating is there, but you can bet that the REC brought it to light and greased the wheels to get the NCAA to move on it.

If an athlete is interested in aeronautical engineering and your school is one of the best. Would saying something like my school is in the top 10 in the country and the other school you are considering is only in the top 30. Would that be considered negative or is that just telling why your school is the better choice in that field?

http://sports.yahoo....mail&soc_trk=ma

I bet schools use this as fodder.

Some people still believe that ole miss has done everything cleanly under Freeze. Hugh Freeze isn't getting his players because he tells them he loves them and sings kumbaya with them.

We may be cheating ourselves but it's definitely not near as conspicuous as Ole Miss.

Wardamneaglewde certainly believes OM is cheating on a whole other level.

So which is it....OM cheating .....or the REC up to its usual tricks? what are the odds......50:50?

Well, if the NCAA found something then the cheating is there, but you can bet that the REC brought it to light and greased the wheels to get the NCAA to move on it.

Ole Miss screwed up they beat bama

If an athlete is interested in aeronautical engineering and your school is one of the best. Would saying something like my school is in the top 10 in the country and the other school you are considering is only in the top 30. Would that be considered negative or is that just telling why your school is the better choice in that field?

That's just stating facts. Now, if the sources of the rankings are not legit... that's negative.

If an athlete is interested in aeronautical engineering and your school is one of the best. Would saying something like my school is in the top 10 in the country and the other school you are considering is only in the top 30. Would that be considered negative or is that just telling why your school is the better choice in that field?

That's just stating facts. Now, if the sources of the rankings are not legit... that's negative.

Well, in the article, Coach X details some practices that would constitute fraud, falsification of data, and other types of unethical conduct if coaches were academics. He details the ways in which the coaches manipulate facts to tell the stories they want to tell.

In the example above, for instance, the coach profiled in the story would have no problem cherry picking stats to make his school's aeronautical engineering program look better than it was and the rival's worse than it was. In other words, you might take your school's highest ranking, and the other school's lowest ranking, as ranked by completely different systems. Or you might generate your own stats, saying something like '100% of our aeronautical engineering graduates get jobs making at least six figures' even if that meant limiting it to one particular year and counting their salaries 10 years down the road (everyone from 1986 got hired, and they all had 6 figure salaries before they retired). You just leave out the details of how you come up with your numbers.

They do it with depth charts, too. You say, look at ours, and show only the Juniors and Seniors; you say, look at theirs, and show everyone, including walkons and commits.

That's not negative recruiting, in my book -- that's flat-out lying and completely unethical.

If an athlete is interested in aeronautical engineering and your school is one of the best. Would saying something like my school is in the top 10 in the country and the other school you are considering is only in the top 30. Would that be considered negative or is that just telling why your school is the better choice in that field?

That's just stating facts. Now, if the sources of the rankings are not legit... that's negative.

Well, in the article, Coach X details some practices that would constitute fraud, falsification of data, and other types of unethical conduct if coaches were academics. He details the ways in which the coaches manipulate facts to tell the stories they want to tell.

In the example above, for instance, the coach profiled in the story would have no problem cherry picking stats to make his school's aeronautical engineering program look better than it was and the rival's worse than it was. In other words, you might take your school's highest ranking, and the other school's lowest ranking, as ranked by completely different systems. Or you might generate your own stats, saying something like '100% of our aeronautical engineering graduates get jobs making at least six figures' even if that meant limiting it to one particular year and counting their salaries 10 years down the road (everyone from 1986 got hired, and they all had 6 figure salaries before they retired). You just leave out the details of how you come up with your numbers.

They do it with depth charts, too. You say, look at ours, and show only the Juniors and Seniors; you say, look at theirs, and show everyone, including walkons and commits.

That's not negative recruiting, in my book -- that's flat-out lying and completely unethical.

Agree 100%... it's also a great way to get elected to political office or named the CEO of a company.

On ESPN. I thought this was the best place to put it:

http://espn.go.com/c...ting-alive-well

Thoughts on negative recruiting? How would you negatively recruit each school in the SEC West? There's more than enough material on this site to negatively recruit AU lol

I don't believe in it & wouldn't do it. I'd be confident as hell I could sell myself, the school I work for & the academics.

Agree with you 100% E. Recruiting can be like politics when it comes the smear campaigns. Tell me what you will do for me not what others want.

It's like Sunday school now compared to bear doing negative recruiting back in the day. Trust me Auburn was no saint cause they did the same thing. Stories I could tell

It does not surprise me that Ole Miss is fixing to get slammed by the NCAA. I wonder to what degree this is going to hurt their program. My guess is as follows:

1. Loss of X number of scholarships (my guess would be 8-12)

2. Loss of bowl game participation for 2 years.

If I am wrong, please let me know. Most know that I do not like Ole Miss in any shape form or whatever. They did some bad stuff particularly the loaner car with no cost to the player. You would think that schools would do whatever they need to do to make sure this does not happen. Unfortunately, far too much of this goes on that never gets caught. I think that the NCAA should open an office in Tuscaloosa loaded for bear!

It does not surprise me that Ole Miss is fixing to get slammed by the NCAA. I wonder to what degree this is going to hurt their program. My guess is as follows:

1. Loss of X number of scholarships (my guess would be 8-12)

2. Loss of bowl game participation for 2 years.

If I am wrong, please let me know. Most know that I do not like Ole Miss in any shape form or whatever. They did some bad stuff particularly the loaner car with no cost to the player. You would think that schools would do whatever they need to do to make sure this does not happen. Unfortunately, far too much of this goes on that never gets caught. I think that the NCAA should open an office in Tuscaloosa loaded for bear!

It does not surprise me that Ole Miss is fixing to get slammed by the NCAA. I wonder to what degree this is going to hurt their program. My guess is as follows:

1. Loss of X number of scholarships (my guess would be 8-12)

2. Loss of bowl game participation for 2 years.

Very little impact. The football issues are w/ Tunsil & were already dealt w/ via his 7 game suspension.

It does not surprise me that Ole Miss is fixing to get slammed by the NCAA. I wonder to what degree this is going to hurt their program. My guess is as follows:

1. Loss of X number of scholarships (my guess would be 8-12)

2. Loss of bowl game participation for 2 years.

Very little impact. The football issues are w/ Tunsil & were already dealt w/ via his 7 game suspension.

8 scholarships over 4 years or 9 scholarships over 3 years is not insignificant, but I believe that plus probation is all they are really going to see you. I think E is right about the Tunsil situation, and a lot of this stuff is pretty old. I think the accusations of Ole Miss being dirty are overblown, as I don't think they are really any dirtier than the vast majority of the rest of the conference. Loaner cars...minor, compared to cush jobs, discounted rental housing, and the other sort of benefits UAT used for Trent, Julio, etc.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...