Jump to content

WAS SCARAMUCCI HIRED TO BE THE CHIEF OF COMMUNICATIONS OR THE CHIEF EXECUTIONER?

AUFAN78

By AUFAN78
in Political Smack Talk

Recommended Posts





GiveEmElle Founding Father

GiveEmElle 1,559

Posted
Posted

Link to original interview. 

 

http://www.newyorker.com/news/ryan-lizza/anthony-scaramucci-called-me-to-unload-about-white-house-leakers-reince-priebus-and-steve-bannon

 

I got the sense that Scaramucci’s campaign against leakers flows from his intense loyalty to Trump. Unlike other Trump advisers, I’ve never heard him say a bad word about the President. “What I want to do is I want to ******* kill all the leakers and I want to get the President’s agenda on track so we can succeed for the American people,” he told me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SaltyTiger Founding Father

SaltyTiger 7,359

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, TexasTiger said:

Good fit with the President.

 

4 minutes ago, alexava said:

Never ceases to amaze. Will Ferrell couldn't pull that off. 

 

2 minutes ago, TexasTiger said:

Maybe Sam Kinison? The Diceman?

 

2 minutes ago, alexava said:

Joe Peschi

 

1 minute ago, alexava said:

I can't spell it 

Substance Tex. We want substance

Link to comment
Share on other sites
quietfan Founding Father

quietfan 233

Posted
Posted

Communications chief or chief executioner?

Given that executioners are traditionally silent and somber, he certainly doesn't fit that role!

And while he certainly 'communicates',  it's not a form of communication that should be coming from the White House!  But when "grab 'em by the p****y" and "She was married but I tried to f*** her....I moved on her like a bitch" is normal talk for a President, why should we expect any better from that President's mouthpiece?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DKW 86 Founding Father

DKW 86 7,173

Posted
Posted
On 7/27/2017 at 9:31 PM, TexasTiger said:

Maybe Sam Kinison? The Diceman?

 

On 7/27/2017 at 9:31 PM, alexava said:

Joe Peschi

Posts of the Day!

Quote

 

Merriam Webster defines mook as a slang term from the 1930's. It refers to a foolish, insignificant, or contemptible person. Wiktionarydefined it as a disagreeable or incompetent person. Pretty close to what i thought it meant.
 
I also found reference to it as a movie/game term. It is a slang term for the hordes of standard-issue, disposable bad guys whom the hero mows down with impunity. Also called "goons," "scrubs," "drones," "flunkies," "pawns," "crunchies," "popcorn," "grunts," "minions," "lackeys," "underlings," "henchpersons," and "Cannon Fodder;" in Japanese, the word is "zako." Sometimes, Mooks will act more as comic relief than an actual menace, having their jeeps flipped in the air, tripping back into their own traps, etc.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Strychnine Founding Father

Strychnine 1,799

Posted
Posted

When Scaramucci was announced, my first thought was that he sounded like a villain from some cheesy Steven Seagal movie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...