The Mueller Team Needs to be Investigated

[TexasTiger 12,828]

6 minutes ago, NolaAuTiger said:

That's the issue. Such bias, or rather "acknowledging the obvious" (as you would have it), violates the legal ethics of one in such a position..... 

An FBI investigation of this sort is SUPPOSE to lack said bias and perform duties with a detached eye...

Thus, the firing . Keep whining though, it's what you do best.

[McLoofus 35,182]

2 minutes ago, Bigbens42 said:

Hang around. We could use a little more sanity on this corner of the forum. 

Hah, clearly. If only it rubbed off. 

[Proud Tiger 4,261]

2 minutes ago, McLoofus said:

Inference seems to be a word of convenience for you.

You used that word in a post directed at me earlier.

[McLoofus 35,182]

2 minutes ago, Proud Tiger said:

You used that word in a post directed at me earlier.

Sure did! 

[SaltyTiger 7,779]

26 minutes ago, McLoofus said:

What's truly comedic is for someone to think that an agent acknowledging the obvious means that Trump isn't in bed with Putin. 

Do you really think that President Trump is perhaps in bed with Vlad? your words Loof

[AUDub 11,143]

1 minute ago, SaltyTiger said:

Do you really think that President Trump is perhaps in bed with Vlad? your words Loof

You know, I think we need someone to define the word inference for others' benefit here. 

[NolaAuTiger 3,295]

23 minutes ago, TexasTiger said:

Thus, the firing . Keep whining though, it's what you do best.

The presence of such bias isn't alarming? Not to mention all of the other matters the guy has been invested in???

[SaltyTiger 7,779]

2 minutes ago, Bigbens42 said:

You know, I think we need someone to define the word inference for others' benefit here. 

Inference was discussed after the post BB. I asked a question. No need for definitions

[NolaAuTiger 3,295]

6 minutes ago, SaltyTiger said:

Do you really think that President Trump is perhaps in bed with Vlad? your words Loof

Of course he does. To hell with Due Process though

[McLoofus 35,182]

1 minute ago, SaltyTiger said:

Do you really think that President Trump is perhaps in bed with Vlad? your words Loof

Wait... What was that "your words" thing all about? Clearly there are many, many people- in fact, all but the most ardent Trump supporters- who think that Trump is figuratively in bed with Putin. Maybe the word "collusion" has been uttered a time or two... But are you asking me if I think that Trump is literally in bed with Putin? 

Help me understand.

[NolaAuTiger 3,295]

26 minutes ago, McLoofus said:

Inference seems to be a word of convenience for you.

Words allow for inference, sooooo?

[McLoofus 35,182]

1 minute ago, NolaAuTiger said:

Of course he does. To hell with Due Process though

I see that opinions get a mixed review in here, too. Y'all crazy.

[SaltyTiger 7,779]

Just now, McLoofus said:

Wait... What was that "your words" thing all about? Clearly there are many, many people- in fact, all but the most ardent Trump supporters- who think that Trump is figuratively in bed with Putin. Maybe the word "collusion" has been uttered a time or two... But are you asking me if I think that Trump is literally in bed with Putin? 

Help me understand.

I asked you a simple question. bed with Putin....you brought it up Loof

[AUDub 11,143]

5 minutes ago, SaltyTiger said:

Inference was discussed after the post BB. I asked a question. No need for definitions

And your question was premised on your faulty inference.

 

[SaltyTiger 7,779]

1 minute ago, Bigbens42 said:

And your question was premised on your faulty inference.

 

Well excuse me BB. I did ask a question. Why are you running interference for Loof

[McLoofus 35,182]

5 minutes ago, SaltyTiger said:

I asked you a simple question. bed with Putin....you brought it up Loof

And I answered the only non-batsh** crazy interpretation of your simple question. Hopefully that was the right one.

By the way, I think I'm posting in a thread about a special investigator who is trying to find out if Trump colluded with Russia. If I'm wrong about that, then I'm super embarrassed.

[NolaAuTiger 3,295]

3 minutes ago, Bigbens42 said:

And your question was premised on your faulty inference.

 

Loof would hold Trump is in bed with Putin... I want to know what he means too. 

[SaltyTiger 7,779]

2 minutes ago, McLoofus said:

And I answered the only non-batsh** interpretation of your simple question. Hopefully that was the right one.

By the way, I think I'm posting in a thread about a special investigator who is trying to find out if Trump colluded with Russia. If I'm wrong about that, then I'm super embarrassed.

A very simple  non-batsh** yes or no would suffice Loof

[NolaAuTiger 3,295]

2 minutes ago, McLoofus said:

 

By the way, I think I'm posting in a thread about a special investigator who is trying to find out if Trump colluded with Russia. If I'm wrong about that, then I'm super embarrassed.

Well, specifically it refers to the underscoring of a witch hunt against Trump, i.e., former/possibly present individuals conducting FBI investigation are biased. 

[AUFAN78 3,894]

1 hour ago, TexasTiger said:

And Mueller fired him. You're whining over nothing. Your scared for your Jim Jones.

Jim Jones? Wow! That is quite the stretch there Tex.

[AUDub 11,143]

9 minutes ago, SaltyTiger said:

Well excuse me BB. I did ask a question. Why are you running interference for Loof

I like loof and enjoy watching you spin your wheels. 

[AUFAN78 3,894]

44 minutes ago, TexasTiger said:

Thus, the firing . Keep whining though, it's what you do best.

In the famous words of homey, irony.

[McLoofus 35,182]

19 minutes ago, AUFAN78 said:

Jim Jones? Wow! That is quite the stretch there Tex.

Not really. Sure, there is a difference in the level to which each man got people to act against their own best interests, but there's an equally significant difference in the number of people each one convinced to do so. 

[AUFAN78 3,894]

3 minutes ago, McLoofus said:

Not really. Sure, there is a difference in the level to which each man got people to act against their own best interests, but there's an equally significant difference in the number of people each one convinced to do so. 

Wow! Okay to me that is crazy talk, but welcome to the forum. Hang around. It can be entertaining.  

[homersapien 11,357]

11 hours ago, NolaAuTiger said:

The presence of such bias isn't alarming? Not to mention all of the other matters the guy has been invested in???

The guy was an educated professional.  I'd be willing to bet most of the professionals in Washington - hell, in the whole country - have a low opinion of Trump.  Way more than the 60% of the general population that have a low opinion of him.