Jump to content

Oklahoma RB facing rape charges


AlaskanFAN

Recommended Posts

OU’s top RB Rodney Anderson is potentially  facing rape charges.  Charges not filed today, but a Emmergency Order of Protection was filed today stemming from a 16 November incident. Could be huge for the playoffs.

http://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/21676086/oklahoma-sooners-rb-rodney-anderson-facing-rape-allegation

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites





5 minutes ago, PowerOfDixieland said:

Mixon was not accused or convicted of rape. 

This is an accusation, charges have not been filed...and if they are this kid is still innocent until proven guilty.  Just like our guys.

Mixon was guilty of knocking a college girl out. Video evidence...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anderson has multiple texts originating from the victim after the date of the allegation whereby she is communicating desperately for him to have any sort of social relationship with him.  He rebuffed her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, PowerOfDixieland said:

Pretty sure that's not rape.

It’s assault, he broke four bones. who cares if it’s not rape. It was still thuggish.  Supposedly a reason for the hit was because she wouldn’t go home with “his boys.”

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, aujeff11 said:

It’s assault, he broke four bones. who cares if it’s not rape. It was still thuggish.  Supposedly a reason for the hit was because she wouldn’t go home with “his boys.”

 

I don't think it's about caring if was rape or not. There is a big difference though. A woman will heal from broken bones but I would imagine a rape victim would always have that memory burned into her mind. I would think any woman who was ever raped would trade it for broken bones any day. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, gr82be said:

A woman will heal from broken bones but I would imagine a rape victim would always have that memory burned into her mind. I would think any woman who was ever raped would trade it for broken bones any day. 

 I never said assault or domestic violence was just as bad as rape. I really don’t think we have to have this conversation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, aujeff11 said:

 I never said assault or domestic violence was just as bad as rape. I really don’t think we have to have this conversation.

Ah, yours was the first response, from the hip, and now you don't want to discuss it.

All violence against women is complete bull**** and deserving of castration.  False claims of such is equally unacceptable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the record I am not a fan of anything OU related...just truth.

“This week we have worked to demonstrate Mr. Anderson’s innocence,” Chance said in the statement. “That work included a polygraph examination of Mr. Anderson. The examination was conducted Tuesday afternoon by retired FBI polygraph examiner Bill Brown. As expected, the results showed Mr. Anderson is honest and truthful in his denial of the allegations.

http://www.tulsaworld.com/sportsextra/ousportsextra/ou-football-rodney-anderson-passes-polygraph-test-involving-rape-accusation/article_10472098-e3ab-5811-9b75-caa3ae645fd6.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PowerOfDixieland said:

For the record I am not a fan of anything OU related...just truth.

“This week we have worked to demonstrate Mr. Anderson’s innocence,” Chance said in the statement. “That work included a polygraph examination of Mr. Anderson. The examination was conducted Tuesday afternoon by retired FBI polygraph examiner Bill Brown. As expected, the results showed Mr. Anderson is honest and truthful in his denial of the allegations.

http://www.tulsaworld.com/sportsextra/ousportsextra/ou-football-rodney-anderson-passes-polygraph-test-involving-rape-accusation/article_10472098-e3ab-5811-9b75-caa3ae645fd6.html

Truth is sometimes hard to find.  JMO but we live in dangerous times when the male is pretty much automatically considered to be guilty in any domestic dispute ranging from harassment to rape.  

Regrettably the odds favor that being true but there are enough instances otherwise to make it risky to pre-judge a situation without facts or proof... though the media and public in general seems willing to do that. . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, PowerOfDixieland said:

For the record I am not a fan of anything OU related...just truth.

“This week we have worked to demonstrate Mr. Anderson’s innocence,” Chance said in the statement. “That work included a polygraph examination of Mr. Anderson. The examination was conducted Tuesday afternoon by retired FBI polygraph examiner Bill Brown. As expected, the results showed Mr. Anderson is honest and truthful in his denial of the allegations.

http://www.tulsaworld.com/sportsextra/ousportsextra/ou-football-rodney-anderson-passes-polygraph-test-involving-rape-accusation/article_10472098-e3ab-5811-9b75-caa3ae645fd6.html

Polygraphs don't stand up to testing.  They aren't admissible as evidence in court for a reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Polygraphs are used extensively by police dpartments and other agencies because they are very reliable. They aren't foolproof, but the are a good measure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If there are texts from the girl wanting a relationship, after the supposed encounter occorred, and he passes a lie-detector test, no way I would sit him without some evidence other than her word. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My point was that a topic was started to insinuate that a program or a player is the wrong.   It’s the same reason everyone that’s associated with auburn was accusing everyone during the Cam situation.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, tiger88 said:

Polygraphs are used extensively by police dpartments and other agencies because they are very reliable. They aren't foolproof, but the are a good measure. 

Polygraphs are not reliable. They are tools of interrogation. Your info is incorrect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CleCoTiger said:

Polygraphs are not reliable. They are tools of interrogation. Your info is incorrect.

You're playing silly semantics. Is your logic that something must be 100% reliable to be considered reliable? 

If they aren't "reliable", why are they used as interrogation tools? 

They aren't reliable enough to be used in court, but they are reliable enough to be an effective tool in investigations. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, CleCoTiger said:

Polygraphs are not reliable. They are tools of interrogation. Your info is incorrect.

Seems legit....

"Of course, as with most things in a courtroom, every rule has its exception. In the rare instance that both parties agree that the results of a polygraph exam should be admissible for some reason, the court could allow it as evidence. Polygraphs are also commonly used as part of the screening process for certain types of jobs, such as law enforcement and some high level security positions."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, tiger88 said:

You're playing silly semantics. Is your logic that something must be 100% reliable to be considered reliable? 

If they aren't "reliable", why are they used as interrogation tools? 

They aren't reliable enough to be used in court, but they are reliable enough to be an effective tool in investigations. 

They are used as interrogation tools because rubes that submit to them don't know that they aren't reliable. Authorities use them to say "You are lying! The machine says so. Now tell the truth."

Anyone that thinks that polygraphs are anything other than junk science should do some Googling.  While Googling, be sure and also Google on Aldrich Ames.  Other terms would be "fool polygraph", or "beat" or "pass" polygraph. Also "polygraph junk science."

Polygraphs don't work. Never have. New technology (functional MRI scans of the brain, etc.) may change that and allow us to one day tell reliably if someone is lying, but polygraphs as currently implemented and used? Nope. Not ever.

(There are no silly semantics in my comments on this subject.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎12‎/‎5‎/‎2017 at 6:45 PM, aujeff11 said:

It’s assault, he broke four bones. who cares if it’s not rape. It was still thuggish.  Supposedly a reason for the hit was because she wouldn’t go home with “his boys.”

 

Watching that video, seems to be the reason for the hit was that she smacked him first and he reacted by smacking her back. His smack trumped her smack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, tigeraddikt said:

Watching that video, seems to be the reason for the hit was that she smacked him first and he reacted by smacking her back. His smack trumped her smack.

Apparently she didn’t like the pressure he kept putting on her. And he didn’t just smack her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...