CBS Spends 3+ Minutes Asking Chelsea Clinton About Kavanaugh Allegations, Never Mentions Bill

[DKW 86 8,201]

CBS Spends 3+ Minutes Asking Chelsea Clinton About Kavanaugh Allegations, Never Mentions Bill

This is why people view American Media as something like frauds. 

Really, discussing Sexual Harassment with a Clinton and not mentioning WJC? WTH?

[bigbird 61,284]

5 hours ago, DKW 86 said:

CBS Spends 3+ Minutes Asking Chelsea Clinton About Kavanaugh Allegations, Never Mentions Bill

This is why people view American Media as something like frauds. 

Really, discussing Sexual Harassment with a Clinton and not mentioning WJC? WTH?

 

 

In related news, the NCAA ask Nick Saban to lead the Rules Infractions Committee.  

[alexava 6,998]

The Clintons should want to steer clear of this unless responding to the way BK implicated them during the hearing. 

[bigbird 61,284]

1 hour ago, alexava said:

The Clintons should want to steer clear of this unless responding to the way BK implicated them during the hearing. 

Yep...they should be no where close to a camera or mic.  

[DKW 86 8,201]

3 hours ago, bigbird said:

Yep...they should be no where close to a camera or mic.  

Except that doing that would make them NOT-Clinton...The entire point of being a Clinton is to be out there doing things that  no other person with a grain of self-awareness could do in good conscience.

[bigbird 61,284]

2 hours ago, DKW 86 said:

Except that doing that would make them NOT-Clinton...The entire point of being a Clinton is to be out there doing things that  no other person with a grain of self-awareness could do in good conscience.

And rarely, if ever, be called out on it or held accountable.

[homersapien 12,837]

4 hours ago, DKW 86 said:

Except that doing that would make them NOT-Clinton...The entire point of being a Clinton is to be out there doing things that  no other person with a grain of self-awareness could do in good conscience.

That's supremely ironic coming from you.

 

[GiveEmElle 1,559]

What is this obsession with the Clinton’s? Chelsea Clinton was a child when her father did what he did. She has absolutely zero to do with her father’s actions. So why would anyone think it’s relevant to ask her about a decades old event that happened during her childhood? You’d think that people in this forum would be more concerned with the rapist sitting in the WH right now rather than the predator that no longer is POTUS. 

[homersapien 12,837]

1 hour ago, GiveEmElle said:

What is this obsession with the Clinton’s? Chelsea Clinton was a child when her father did what he did. She has absolutely zero to do with her father’s actions. So why would anyone think it’s relevant to ask her about a decades old event that happened during her childhood? You’d think that people in this forum would be more concerned with the rapist sitting in the WH right now rather than the predator that no longer is POTUS. 

Not to mention hammering the press because they failed to grill her over it:

"This is why people view American Media as something like frauds. Really, discussing Sexual Harassment with a Clinton and not mentioning WJC? WTH?"

What a stupidly bizarre and ironic statement.   People view the media as fraudulent because they don't pursue irrelevant partisan angles? 

[WDavE 332]

6 hours ago, homersapien said:

That's supremely ironic coming from you.

 

Speaking of ironic

Bill Clinton says Judge Kavanaugh is a “threat” to our country & a “disgrace” to women.

[GiveEmElle 1,559]

1 hour ago, homersapien said:

Not to mention hammering the press because they failed to grill her over it:

"This is why people view American Media as something like frauds. Really, discussing Sexual Harassment with a Clinton and not mentioning WJC? WTH?"

What a stupidly bizarre and ironic statement.   People view the media as fraudulent because they don't pursue irrelevant partisan angles? 

Ivanka Trump who actually works in the WH was asked about her father’s sexual assault and rape allegations and the right was livid that the media would do that to her. If hypocrisy were fatal, republicans wouldn’t exist. 

[Proud Tiger 4,261]

20 minutes ago, WDavE said:

Speaking of ironic

Bill Clinton says Judge Kavanaugh is a “threat” to our country & a “disgrace” to women.

The Clintons are the epitomy of hypocrisy.

[GiveEmElle 1,559]

1 hour ago, WDavE said:

Speaking of ironic

Bill Clinton says Judge Kavanaugh is a “threat” to our country & a “disgrace” to women.

Speaking of ironic, Kavanaugh penned graphic questions for Bill Clinton while working for Ken Starr on the subject of sexual misdeeds. But now that he is the one being questioned it’s a conspiracy. 

[Proud Tiger 4,261]

5 hours ago, WDavE said:

Speaking of ironic

Bill Clinton says Judge Kavanaugh is a “threat” to our country & a “disgrace” to women.

I wish we had more intelligent, non biased women on the board to get a spectrum of opinion.

[GiveEmElle 1,559]

20 minutes ago, Proud Tiger said:

I wish we had more intelligent, non biased women on the board to get a spectrum of opinion.

Oh my! An elderly white male behind a keyboard has insulted my intelligence because I’m a liberal and don’t adore the POTUS that he elevates to unthinking conventional reverence. I’m certain I’ll lose sleep. 

[DKW 86 8,201]

1) What could Chelsea Clinton have to say that hasn't been said by 1M+ other women? Nothing.

2) Her only seeming experience with women being harassed would be with her father as harasser. 

3) If she is a grownup and obviously has political aspirations, she will have to deal with this and soon on very public forums like debates etc.  

4) If it is relevant to discuss what had little to any real evidence and corroboration 30-40 years ago (BK) to what was corroborated and had evidence of enough that WJC got drug into a courtroom with real burdens of proof. 

This is exactly what partisan hackery gets you, a mindless shoutdown over what most of the world considers to be a legitimate question. Ted Kennedy as someone wrote is #metoo#1. Some of us have to wonder if TK had been treated like he should have, would BK et al have been a thing? 

Now, please resume your normal 24-7-365 mindless regurgitation of talking points.

[GiveEmElle 1,559]

3 hours ago, DKW 86 said:

1) What could Chelsea Clinton have to say that hasn't been said by 1M+ other women? Nothing.

2) Her only seeming experience with women being harassed would be with her father as harasser. 

3) If she is a grownup and obviously has political aspirations, she will have to deal with this and soon on very public forums like debates etc.  

4) If it is relevant to discuss what had little to any real evidence and corroboration 30-40 years ago (BK) to what was corroborated and had evidence of enough that WJC got drug into a courtroom with real burdens of proof. 

This is exactly what partisan hackery gets you, a mindless shoutdown over what most of the world considers to be a legitimate question. Ted Kennedy as someone wrote is #metoo#1. Some of us have to wonder if TK had been treated like he should have, would BK et al have been a thing? 

Now, please resume your normal 24-7-365 mindless regurgitation of talking points.

1) Sounds like you have a problem with Chelsea Clinton and a million other women who speak up. 

2) Her only seeming experience? Talk about a thoughtless statement. She is a female so there is an absolutely 100% chance that either she or a female she knows has experienced rape or sexual assault. 

3) She is a grownup. But so far she has expressed no desire to pursue political aspirations. And if you want to see the bull**** she deals with on a daily basis from misogynistic men go to her Twitter. She is demeaned and personally attacked on the daily by people just like you and she handles it with dignity and grace. 

4) It was relevant to discuss BK’s past from 30+ years ago because he is being considered for a lifetime position on the highest court in the land. It’s remarkable that you can’t grasp this without whining about a Clinton. But then again, that’s what Kavanaugh did. Entitled white males. 

If you want to condemn partisan hacks then maybe you shouldn’t do it while  simultaneously being one yourself. Are you equally enraged that Bill Cosby was tried for acts committed decades ago? Or what about Al Frankken who was forced to resign for a  picture while republicans laud a POTUS and SCOTUS nominee both accused of rape and sexual assault respectively. Clearly you think that because a dead Senator wasn’t prosecuted that we should ignore it today. Women today are becoming more empowered to come forward and report rape and sexual assault. And that bugs the hell out of the patriarchy. 

Mindless regurgiatations? That’s code for triggered white male. 

[DKW 86 8,201]

35 minutes ago, GiveEmElle said:

1) Sounds like you have a problem with Chelsea Clinton and a million other women who speak up. 

Damn Lie. Completely totally wrong. NEVER said that.

2) Her only seeming experience? Talk about a thoughtless statement. She is a female so there is an absolutely 100% chance that either she or a female she knows has experienced rape or sexual assault. 

Again BS. You dont know that at all. The only known evidence we have is her Dads harassment of so many women. Why are defendinmg the Clnions over women Bill harassed? What about them? Do they not get Justice too? Or are they not part of the correct party?

3) She is a grownup. But so far she has expressed no desire to pursue political aspirations. And if you want to see the bull**** she deals with on a daily basis from misogynistic men go to her Twitter. She is demeaned and personally attacked on the daily by people just like you and she handles it with dignity and grace. 

I have never attacked CC in my life time. again, Total BS. You are getting real good at flying off the handle. Has homey hacked your account?

4) It was relevant to discuss BK’s past from 30+ years ago because he is being considered for a lifetime position on the highest court in the land. It’s remarkable that you can’t grasp this without whining about a Clinton. But then again, that’s what Kavanaugh did. Entitled white males. 

I am not entitled at all. I have Sisters, a wife, and a daughter. I dont think any of them would wait 30 years to confront an ass like BK or WJC. 

If you want to condemn partisan hacks then maybe you shouldn’t do it while  simultaneously being one yourself.

I am not a partisan anything. You are looking more and more like hack by the minute. I am the one supporting JD. Partisan? BS!

Are you equally enraged that Bill Cosby was tried for acts committed decades ago?

Absolutely not. Where did you get the idea I was?

Or what about Al Frankken who was forced to resign for a  picture

Again, a lie, he groped many more, Why would you deny them if YOU arent the partisan hack?

while republicans laud a POTUS and SCOTUS nominee both accused of rape and sexual assault respectively.

I do not laud BK at all. I want the entire lot of sorry people prosecuted. YOU do not. 

Clearly you think that because a dead Senator wasn’t prosecuted that we should ignore it today.

Again, exactly the opposite. I want ALL CREDIBLE ACTIONABLE Accounts brought up and prosecuted. YOU DO NOT.

Women today are becoming more empowered to come forward and report rape and sexual assault. And that bugs the hell out of the patriarchy. 

I agree and LOVE IT.  I HOPE we see HW et al in prison or ruined finanacially at least.

Mindless regurgiatations? That’s code for triggered white male. 

And so far, YOU have proved my point. YOU mindlessly just accused me of things YOU are triggered by. YOU lied your rear end off just now. Not me.

17

 

[Proud Tiger 4,261]

13 hours ago, GiveEmElle said:

Oh my! An elderly white male behind a keyboard has insulted my intelligence because I’m a liberal and don’t adore the POTUS that he elevates to unthinking conventional reverence. I’m certain I’ll lose sleep. 

I never called you out by name any more than you do me when you make general snide remarks about Republicans and Christians. Stop the insults here and be like the lady you were when we talked face to face in Auburn awhile back. Don't you love me?

[GiveEmElle 1,559]

@DKW 86

First, if you use reading comprehension you’ll see I said it sounded like you had a problem with Chelsea Clinton. Your post clearly states that you are upset because she wasn’t asked in an interview about the sexual exploits of her father when she was a child. 

Second, it isn’t uncommon for women to not report sexual assault or rape immediately after it occurs. Any therapist that works with victims of sexual assault can confirm this. So just because you don’t THINK the women in your life wouldn’t wait doesn’t mean that women don’t wait. One of my dearest friends was raped years ago and still hadn’t reported it because she blames herself. Women are considered guilty until they prove they are a victim. They are accused of drinking too much, not wearing enough, being in the wrong place, or out for money. This is rape culture. 

Feel free to explain to me why you are so bothered by Chelsea Clinton not being asked about an event from her childhood. There’s no relevance to her being asked so you came across as partisan.  I’ll willingly admit that I’m partisan. I’ll never vote for a Republican as long as there is breath in my body. They’ve done nothing to earn my respect nor my vote- case in point, they are most likely going to vote in a partisan hack to a lifetime judicial position who most likely has commied sexual assault so that their rapist POTUS can get a pardon for his crimes. 

And you’re dang right I’m triggered by the fact that you want to criticize a media outlet for not asking CC about her father’s sex act in the oval. That’s a very petty thing to post. Since you declare so adamantly how opposed you are to men who commit sexual assault, jump CBS for not asking Trump about raping a 13 year old girl. 

I didn’t mindlessly accuse you of things. There was thought behind what I said. You sound exactly like every other male who has a Clinton complex. If you don’t want to be thought of as such then post differently. And you can type LIAR at me all you want. Your perception is not reality. 

[GiveEmElle 1,559]

1 hour ago, Proud Tiger said:

I never called you out by name any more than you do me when you make general snide remarks about Republicans and Christians. Stop the insults here and be like the lady you were when we talked face to face in Auburn awhile back. Don't you love me?

You don’t have to call me out by name when I’m the only woman who has posted in here. And one more time for the people in back- THIS IS A SMACK TALK FORUM, so snide is a given. Man up and stop whining about it. And insulting political stupidity has zero to do with being a lady. But consider it duly noted that you insult me in a post where you tell me to stop the insults.

[Proud Tiger 4,261]

32 minutes ago, GiveEmElle said:

You don’t have to call me out by name when I’m the only woman who has posted in here. And one more time for the people in back- THIS IS A SMACK TALK FORUM, so snide is a given. Man up and stop whining about it. And insulting political stupidity has zero to do with being a lady. But consider it duly noted that you insult me in a post where you tell me to stop the insults.

WRONG so your credibility (or ego) is shot. But I will leave that for channoc and Tigerbelle to decide if they are women. Even though it is the Smack Forum I won't stoop to your level with further response lest you whine again to a mod by saying I'm threatening you.

[homersapien 12,837]

21 hours ago, WDavE said:

Speaking of ironic

Bill Clinton says Judge Kavanaugh is a “threat” to our country & a “disgrace” to women.

Not sure why this is ironic, but if Trump was backing Kavanaugh so hard because of his positions on executive privilege, he could be a threat to our country.

Obviously, the "disgrace to women part" depends totally on whether or not you believe Ford. I do and I suspect a lot of women do also.

[homersapien 12,837]

16 hours ago, Proud Tiger said:

I wish we had more intelligent, non biased women on the board to get a spectrum of opinion.

Are you saying we don't have enough women on the forum or implying the ones here are biased and unintelligent?

I certainly agree with the former.

[homersapien 12,837]

6 hours ago, DKW 86 said:

1) Sounds like you have a problem with Chelsea Clinton and a million other women who speak up. 

Damn Lie. Completely totally wrong. NEVER said that.

That wasn't a claim of something you said.   Don't misrepresent it.

2) Her only seeming experience? Talk about a thoughtless statement. She is a female so there is an absolutely 100% chance that either she or a female she knows has experienced rape or sexual assault. 

Again BS. You dont know that at all. The only known evidence we have is her Dads harassment of so many women. Why are defendinmg the Clnions over women Bill harassed? What about them? Do they not get Justice too? Or are they not part of the correct party?

Can you prove Elle wrong?  Bill's transgressions have nothing to do with Chelsea's experience, much less being "evidence". Red Herring.

Justice for Bill's victims is also a red herring regarding this discussion of Chelsea.

3) She is a grownup. But so far she has expressed no desire to pursue political aspirations. And if you want to see the bull**** she deals with on a daily basis from misogynistic men go to her Twitter. She is demeaned and personally attacked on the daily by people just like you and she handles it with dignity and grace. 

I have never attacked CC in my life time. again, Total BS. You are getting real good at flying off the handle. Has homey hacked your account?

If you look a little more carefully. Elle didn't say you attacked CC.  She said you she is attacked by people like you. Again you are making something up that someone didn't actually say to serve your rage. 

4) It was relevant to discuss BK’s past from 30+ years ago because he is being considered for a lifetime position on the highest court in the land. It’s remarkable that you can’t grasp this without whining about a Clinton. But then again, that’s what Kavanaugh did. Entitled white males. 

I am not entitled at all. I have Sisters, a wife, and a daughter. I dont think any of them would wait 30 years to confront an ass like BK or WJC. 

Maybe you should ask them.  They might surprise you.

If you want to condemn partisan hacks then maybe you shouldn’t do it while  simultaneously being one yourself.

I am not a partisan anything. You are looking more and more like hack by the minute. I am the one supporting JD. Partisan? BS!

David, you go off on rants all the time - mostly on Democrats.  Hmmmmm?

Anyway a reasonable person might see you as partisan. Doesn't take a "hack" (whatever that is.)

Are you equally enraged that Bill Cosby was tried for acts committed decades ago?

Absolutely not. Where did you get the idea I was?

She asked if you were.  She didn't have an "idea you were". 

Or what about Al Frankken who was forced to resign for a  picture

Again, a lie, he groped many more, Why would you deny them if YOU arent the partisan hack?

How is this a lie?  Maybe incomplete, but certainly not a lie.  You're big on liar accusations aren't you?

while republicans laud a POTUS and SCOTUS nominee both accused of rape and sexual assault respectively.

I do not laud BK at all. I want the entire lot of sorry people prosecuted. YOU do not. 

What's your logic here for concluding Elle "does not"? 

Clearly you think that because a dead Senator wasn’t prosecuted that we should ignore it today.

Again, exactly the opposite. I want ALL CREDIBLE ACTIONABLE Accounts brought up and prosecuted. YOU DO NOT.

What's your logic here for concluding Elle "does not"? 

Women today are becoming more empowered to come forward and report rape and sexual assault. And that bugs the hell out of the patriarchy. 

I agree and LOVE IT.  I HOPE we see HW et al in prison or ruined finanacially at least.

Mindless regurgiatations? That’s code for triggered white male. 

And so far, YOU have proved my point. YOU mindlessly just accused me of things YOU are triggered by. YOU lied your rear end off just now. Not me.

Again with the false liar accusations.  That's become a real pattern with you.

She didn't lie David.  Not once.  Pay more attention to what people actually write instead of running with it emotionally.

My apologies Elle for butting in. You certainly don't need my help.

I just couldn't resist.