AUFAN78 3,889 Posted March 7, 2023 Share Posted March 7, 2023 On 3/6/2023 at 12:56 PM, homersapien said: Stop lying. He didn’t say that. You are free to search the archives and show his previous ethics complaints against Supreme Court Justices. I look forward to seeing them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUFAN78 3,889 Posted March 7, 2023 Share Posted March 7, 2023 On 3/6/2023 at 12:59 PM, homersapien said: Thomas refusing to recuse himself from hearings his wife was involved with politically. That's a long list homes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUFAN78 3,889 Posted March 7, 2023 Share Posted March 7, 2023 3 hours ago, CoffeeTiger said: So if we're acknowledging multiple failures of ethical conduct in the Supreme Court from both conservatives and liberal judges now and in the past, why are you and @AUFAN78 opposed to ethical reform? The Supreme Court obviously doesn't do a good job of keeping it's own justices from hearing cases they have direct involvement in...so why are you comfortable allowing that to continue? I have not stated opposition, but questioned why now? IMO the answer is quite obvious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homersapien 11,347 Posted March 8, 2023 Share Posted March 8, 2023 On 3/6/2023 at 8:22 PM, jj3jordan said: Similarly Kagen failing to recuse herself from the ACA case as she was the architect of the defense of the ACA for Obama. agreed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homersapien 11,347 Posted March 8, 2023 Share Posted March 8, 2023 (edited) On 3/6/2023 at 10:46 PM, jj3jordan said: No. Letting Homer know his research was incomplete. Don't be such a jerk. 78 asked for a list (as if we worked for him ). I provided one off the top of my head, so my "research" is just as good as yours. There may be many more for all I know, so, we are at two and counting. Anyway, thanks for supporting Coffee's point Edited March 8, 2023 by homersapien Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homersapien 11,347 Posted March 8, 2023 Share Posted March 8, 2023 On 3/6/2023 at 12:36 PM, AUFAN78 said: Good grief. Strain at gnats if you choose. Ethics my ***. Go ahead and list recent ethical misconduct. This hasn't been nor is it now an ethics problem. It is an attempted power grab by a power cult. Not complicated. So, how would you describe McConnell's hypocritical strategy regarding SCOTUS senate hearings if not a "power grab'? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homersapien 11,347 Posted March 8, 2023 Share Posted March 8, 2023 (edited) On 3/7/2023 at 3:02 PM, AUFAN78 said: That's a long list homes. Do your own research. JJ and I have started you off. Meanwhile, here's a list on Clarence Thomas alone: A Brief History of Clarence Thomas' Ethical Entanglements - The Atlantic Edited March 8, 2023 by homersapien Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homersapien 11,347 Posted March 8, 2023 Share Posted March 8, 2023 On 3/7/2023 at 3:00 PM, AUFAN78 said: You are free to search the archives and show his previous ethics complaints against Supreme Court Justices. I look forward to seeing them. And you are free to kiss my ass, liar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUFAN78 3,889 Posted March 12, 2023 Share Posted March 12, 2023 On 3/8/2023 at 2:20 PM, homersapien said: And you are free to kiss my ass, liar. Still waiting on that list homes minus your normal obfuscation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now