Jump to content

Bush's Obscene Tirades Rattle White House Aides


TexasTiger

Recommended Posts

Another Day in the Oval Office

While President George W. Bush travels around the country in a last-ditch effort to sell his Iraq war, White House aides scramble frantically behind the scenes to hide the dark mood of an increasingly angry leader who unleashes obscenity-filled outbursts at anyone who dares disagree with him.

“I’m not meeting again with that goddamned bitch,” Bush screamed at aides who suggested he meet again with Cindy Sheehan, the war-protesting mother whose son died in Iraq. “She can go to hell as far as I’m concerned!”

Bush flashes the bird, something aides say he does often and has been doing since his days as governor of Texas.Bush, administration aides confide, frequently explodes into tirades over those who protest the war, calling them “mother****ing traitors.” He reportedly was so upset over Veterans of Foreign Wars members who wore “bull**** protectors” over their ears during his speech to their annual convention that he told aides to “tell those VFW a**holes that I’ll never speak to them again is they can’t keep their members under control.”

White House insiders say Bush is growing increasingly bitter over mounting opposition to his war in Iraq. Polls show a vast majority of Americans now believe the war was a mistake and most doubt the President’s honesty.

“Who gives a flying **** what the polls say,” he screamed at a recent strategy meeting. “I’m the President and I’ll do whatever I goddamned please. They don’t know ****.”

Bush, whiles setting up for a photo op for signing the recent CAFTA bill, flipped an extended middle finger to reporters. Aides say the President often “flips the bird” to show his displeasure and tells aides who disagree with him to “go to hell” or to “go **** yourself.” His habit of giving people the finger goes back to his days as Texas governor, aides admit, and videos of him doing so before press conferences were widely circulated among TV stations during those days. A recent video showing him shooting the finger to reporters while walking also recently surfaced.

Bush’s behavior, according to prominent Washington psychiatrist, Dr. Justin Frank, author of “Bush on the Couch: Inside the Mind of the President,” is all too typical of an alcohol-abusing bully who is ruled by fear.

To see that fear emerges, Dr. Frank says, all one has to do is confront the President. “To actually directly confront him in a clear way, to bring him out, so you would really see the bully, and you would also see the fear,” he says.

Dr. Frank, in his book, speculates that Bush, an alcoholic who brags that he gave up booze without help from groups like Alcoholics Anonymous, may be drinking again.

“Two questions that the press seems particularly determined to ignore have hung silently in the air since before Bush took office,” Dr. Frank says.  “Is he still drinking? And if not, is he impaired by all the years he did spend drinking? Both questions need to be addressed in any serious assessment of his psychological state.”

Last year, Capitol Hill Blue learned the White House physician prescribed anti-depressant drugs for the President to control what aides called “violent mood swings.” As Dr. Frank also notes: “In writing about Bush's halting appearance in a press conference just before the start of the Iraq War, Washington Post media critic Tom Shales speculated that ‘the president may have been ever so slightly medicated.’”

Dr. Frank explains Bush’s behavior as all-to-typical of an alcoholic who is still in denial:

“The pattern of blame and denial, which recovering alcoholics work so hard to break, seems to be ingrained in the alcoholic personality; it's rarely limited to his or her drinking,” he says. “The habit of placing blame and denying responsibility is so prevalent in George W. Bush's personal history that it is apparently triggered by even the mildest threat.”

http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publ...icle_7267.shtml

Link to comment
Share on other sites





Wow! That article is just full of verifible sources there isn't it? It is a good thing that people can just write whatever they want and not have to quote and specific sources huh? Who wrote this? John Grisham, Stephen King, Tom Clancy, or Dr. Suess?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who wrote this? John Grisham, Stephen King, Tom Clancy, or Dr. Suess?

176723[/snapback]

It was probably Kitty Kelly or Al Franken. Dr. Suess uses more verifiable sources and Stephen King would actually waste paper on killing Bush in one of his books.

Alex

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This article is a clear example of the worst the Internet has to offer.

All I had to see was "blue" and I knew then what to look for. SSDD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

C'mon guys, this HAS to be the truth because TT posted it. We have to take off our Republican blinders and see things from an enlightened viewpoint. Remember, America and GWB = BAD

TexasTiger, I assume this is yet more proof of your conservative being?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Left has no problem putting out fantasy where the facts don't fit their world view. Dan Rather,anyone? There's a preconceived idea of how Bush, hell, everyone on the Right acts. It's a prejudice of the Left, a template they perpetuate over and over until it becomes reality. To them, it makes no difference if such events actually occured or not. They FEEL they did, and that justifies , in their mind, putting out such fiction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Left has no problem putting out fantasy where the facts don't fit their world view. Dan Rather,anyone? There's a preconceived idea of how Bush, hell, everyone on the Right acts. It's a prejudice of the Left, a template they perpetuate over and over until it becomes reality. To them, it makes no difference if such events actually occured or not. They FEEL they did, and that justifies , in their mind, putting out such fiction.

176765[/snapback]

We have seen this tactic so many times over the past year: the National Guard issue, memogate, voter suppression-gate, the Rove-Plame accusation, Federalist Society-gate, etc. Our resident liberal leaning conservative has stated before that although the definition of a crime may not be met, suspicion is grounds enough for perceived involvement in "something". Afterall, in the liberal playbook, it is not necessary for the accuser to prove their case to be the truth. It is up to the accused to prove that it is not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just another vast left wing conspiracy. :big:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just another vast left wing conspiracy. :big:

176791[/snapback]

It's interesting to note that Bush has been out of the W.H. for ...how long? The entire month of August ? Yet this article is posted Aug. 25th. Maybe the folks on the Left aren't happy w/the way their Cindy-a-thon bashing of the President is going, so the feel the need to throw more gas on the dying fire that is their delusional hatred for the President of the United States of America.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That someone would actually print this without any verifiable sources is very scary. Could I see it as possible? Anything is possible, but its almost impossible to hide this type of behavior with all the scrutiny the left-nutted media gives the president these days. What, you're telling me that the media "CHOOSES" not to print or air these happenings. Yeah. OK. I believe you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That someone would actually print this without any verifiable sources is very scary. Could I see it as possible? Anything is possible, but its almost impossible to hide this type of behavior with all the scrutiny the left-nutted media gives the president these days. What, you're telling me that the media "CHOOSES" not to print or air these happenings. Yeah. OK. I believe you.

176840[/snapback]

If the president farted and failed to immediately excuse himself, the main stream media would have blown it :) way out of proportion. The media does not choose to "not to print or air" anything negative (real or imagined) about this President.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd suggest a healthy level of skepticism for any "news" report, this one included. Still, I thought it was on par with the sources most of those commenting on it typically rely upon, e.g. Newsmax, etc. I was even surprised to see the Wall Street Journal and H&R Block advertising on it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a time where The New York Times and CBS News have been caught fabricating the news, you base credability on who ADVERTISES on that site ?

My, how standards have changed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a time where The New York Times and CBS News have been caught fabricating the news, you base credability on who ADVERTISES on that site ?

My, how standards have changed.

177079[/snapback]

I didn't say anything of the sort in regard to "credibility". In fact, I said I thought it was on par with Newsmax in that regard, which ain't saying much. But if it is the librul Newsmax, I was surprised to see the WSJ advertising on it. I also saw some MJ legalization ad. Go figure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He worships the devil too. I know some who really believe this.

177128[/snapback]

Some think Elvis is still alive. Carl Everett ( ML Baseball player ) thinks man lived w/ dinosaurs. Bush worshipping Satan makes about as much sense at the other two.

Wash - That sounds like science fiction!

Zoe - You live on a space ship, dear.

Wash - So?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a time where The New York Times and CBS News have been caught fabricating the news, you base credability on who ADVERTISES on that site ?

My, how standards have changed.

177079[/snapback]

I didn't say anything of the sort in regard to "credibility". In fact, I said I thought it was on par with Newsmax in that regard, which ain't saying much. But if it is the librul Newsmax, I was surprised to see the WSJ advertising on it. I also saw some MJ legalization ad. Go figure.

177135[/snapback]

:roflol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't forget. Al Franken is reporting that the President is dating Cortney Love. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't forget. Al Franken is reporting that the President is dating Cortney Love. :P

177234[/snapback]

She still alive? :huh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't forget. Al Franken is reporting that the President is dating Cortney Love. :P

177234[/snapback]

She still alive? :huh:

177253[/snapback]

Yeah, she's still cruising along at 45,000 feet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...