Ford Announces Deep Production Cuts

[DKW 86 7,419]

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/08/18/D8JJ4L3G1.html

I no longer have pity for the American car companies. If the management cant figure out to change the product mix, if the UAW cant figure out that their contracts are horrendously out of touch with global wages, then let the car manufacturers fall on the ash heap of history. You would think they would have made the changes by now to turn this thing around and yet they continue to try and sell vehicles the public wont/cant buy.

Since 1950, American consumers have lost: AllState, Checker, Crosley, DeSoto, Edsel, Frazer, Hudson, Kaiser, Muntz, Olds, Packard, Plymouth, Rambler, Sudebaker, DeLorean, Yugo, Fiat, Geo, and others. Rumors are we will see Pontiac, Buick, Mercury, Saab, either severely cutback or gone in a year or two.

Honda, Hyundai, Toyota, Kia, Suzuki, Mazda, Mercedes, BMW, Nissan are selling like there is no tommorow. Booming is almost an understatement for Honda, Toyota, and Hyundai. You can build cars in the US with US Workers and make scads of money. You just need good mgt and little to no Union involvement. You can pay more than fair wages and benefits and still make tons of cash.

Ford Announces Deep Production Cuts

Aug 18 7:17 PM US/Eastern

Email this story

By SARAH KARUSH

Associated Press Writer

Ford Motor Co. said Friday it would temporarily halt production at 10 assembly plants between now and the end of the year, blaming high gas prices for pushing many consumers away from its pickups and SUVs and toward higher-mileage models.

Ford said the cuts will reduce the need for costly incentives to reduce bloated inventories. But they also illustrate just how out of step the lineup at the nation's second-largest automaker has become, as it loses market share to mostly Asian competitors under the watch of Chairman and Chief Executive Bill Ford.

General Motors Corp. and DaimlerChrysler AG's Chrysler Group also have been caught in the shift away from trucks and SUVs to smaller cars and crossovers as consumers seek better fuel economy. The Big Three's combined U.S. market share fell to 54.5 percent for the first seven months of 2006, down from 58.7 percent in the same period a year ago.

GM already has announced it will cut production 7 percent to 8 percent in the third-quarter.

Ford announced a turnaround plan in January that called for shedding 25,000 to 30,000 jobs and closing 14 plants by 2012. By year's end, the company was to have cut production capacity 15 percent.

Bill Ford said last month that the plan _ dubbed the "Way Forward" _ would be accelerated. He said Friday that the details would be revealed in September.

In response to the production cuts, Fitch Ratings downgraded Ford's debt further into junk status, while two other ratings agencies placed the company on review. Analysts said next month's announcements could include more plant closures and job cuts, as well as speeded-up introductions of new cars and crossovers.

The company said fourth-quarter production would be down 21 percent, or 168,000 units, from last year. Third-quarter production will be 20,000 units below what was previously announced and 78,000 units below last year.

For the full year, Ford plans to produce about 9 percent fewer vehicles than last year for a total of just above 3 million.

"We know this decision will have a dramatic impact on our employees, as well as our suppliers," Chairman and Chief Executive Bill Ford said in an e-mail to employees. "This is, however, the right call for our customers, our dealers and our long-term future."

He said it was the company's biggest North American production cut in more than 20 years.

Dearborn-based Ford, which lost $254 million in the second quarter, said last month that the speed of the market shift away from trucks had taken it by surprise. Like other U.S. automakers, Ford is heavily dependent on sport utility vehicles and other trucks, which have far higher profit margins than cars. Last year, 68 percent of the vehicles sold by the company in the U.S. were trucks, compared with 58 percent for the industry as a whole.

"An unprecedented spike in gasoline prices during the second quarter impacted our product lineup more than that of our competitors because of the long-standing success of our trucks and SUVs," Bill Ford said in his note Friday.

The nation's second-largest automaker said that by better matching inventories to demand, it can avoid costly incentives and reduce inventory carrying costs for dealers.

Reducing incentives will help improve resale values of vehicles, and more rational inventories will help "stabilize operating patterns for our plants and our suppliers," Mark Fields, Ford's president of the Americas, said in a statement.

The Wall Street Journal, citing unidentified sources, reported Friday that Ford is considering shutting down more factories and cutting salaried jobs and benefits by 10 percent to 30 percent.

Ford spokesman Oscar Suris declined to comment on the report.

The new production schedule will result in temporary shutdown this year at assembly plants in St. Thomas, Ontario; Chicago; Wixom, Mich.; Louisville, Ky.; Wayne, Mich.; St. Paul, Minn.; Kansas City, Mo.; Norfolk, Va.; and Dearborn, Mich.; Ford said.

Company officials would not say what specific impact the production cuts would have on workers. In general, hourly workers placed on temporary layoff receive 95 percent of their wages through state unemployment benefits and a supplement by Ford.

The United Auto Workers had no immediate comment on the announcement.

In Louisville, which has two affected plants, Mayor Jerry Abramson said he was told by Ford executives that the Louisville Assembly Plant, which makes the Ford Explorer and Mercury Mountaineer, will be shuttered for six weeks. The Kentucky Truck Plant, one of four plants producing the best-selling F-Series pickups, will close for five weeks in the fourth quarter, he said.

Abramson said state and local officials have asked to meet with Ford officials.

The production cuts are the second time this week that slower sales have forced Ford to announce changes. On Tuesday, it said it would trim the number of dealerships it has in 18 metropolitan areas. Dealer profits declined an average of 10 percent in the first half of 2006, the company has said.

In response to the production cuts, Fitch downgraded Ford and its finance arm Ford Motor Credit Co. to "B" from "B+" and lowered its senior unsecured debt to "B+" from "BB-."

"Implicit in the production cutbacks are expectations of continued weak pickup sales that have resulted in extended inventories," the agency said. "Volume declines in Ford's pickup segment, along with continued declines in mid-size and large SUVs, are likely to accelerate revenue declines and negative cash flows in 2006."

Standard & Poor's Ratings Services and Moody's Investors Service both put Ford's credit ratings on review for possible downgrades further into junk territory.

Ford shares fell 17 cents, or 2.1 percent, to close at $8 on the New York Stock Exchange.

Bank of America analyst Ron Tadross said the cuts are a sign that "Ford is getting more realistic about its share trajectory."

Craig Hutson, an auto analyst at the corporate bond research firm Gimme Credit, said that while the cuts are aimed at matching supply and demand in the long term, "the short-term ramifications will be ugly."

"Trucks are Ford's most profitable vehicles, and the sharp decline in production volumes will make it more difficult to see any signs of a turnaround at Ford," he said in a research note.

The production cuts are likely to affect the revenues of many of Ford suppliers.

"When our customers adjust production up or down, we obviously adjust accordingly," said Jim Fisher, a spokesman for Visteon Corp., Ford's largest supplier.

Fisher said the company was assessing the impact of Ford's cuts.

[rexbo 104]

It all comes down to the basics; good engineering design and manufacturing quality. My brother owned a Chevrlolet Baretta in the mid90's, the door fell off. A friend of mine had a Z28, when his automatic window broke, they actually had to cut the metal frame inside the door to repair it, costing him $500+. My Mazda automatic window broke, I ordered a new part online for $50 and replaced it myself.

I have been an auto enthusiast since the late 70's when I started driving; I saw then there was a huge difference in the quality of cars, and have been waiting for the US to put something on the market that could compete; they have not come close, if anything, they are falling even further behind...