Jump to content

Malzahn's Offense


DKW 86

Recommended Posts

http://www.arsnonline.com/modules.php?op=m...le&sid=3132

Sports: Razorbacks adjusting to Malzahn's offense

on Wednesday, August 09, 2006 - 06:02 AM

Fayetteville - Gus Malzahn's new team is figuring out how to run his offense.

The most important things to remember? Think fast -- and you better be in shape.

"Now we know what to expect as far as no-huddle," guard Stephen Parker said, speaking for the entire offensive line. "Spring was kind of a shock to us."

Malzahn was hired as Arkansas' offensive coordinator in December after an outstanding coaching run at three Arkansas high schools. Last year, his Springdale team went 14-0 and won the Class AAAAA title, outscoring its opponents 664-118 with a devastating spread offense.

Now, Malzahn is with an Arkansas team that averaged only 143.7 yards passing per game in 2005. The Razorbacks went 4-7, their second straight losing record.

"Anything that's new takes time," Malzahn said Monday at media day. "Here's the good thing. We can tell such a huge difference from the spring to here, even though we're still rotating a lot of guys."

Arkansas coaches are trying to choose a starting quarterback and figure out which of the team's many freshman receivers are good enough to make an immediate impact. The Razorbacks are also adjusting to the loss of Darren McFadden, who is doubtful for their season opener against Southern California on Sept. 2 because of a dislocated toe.

But although the depth chart isn't set, the Razorbacks are growing more accustomed to the no-huddle offense Malzahn loves to run. Freshman receiver Andrew Norman, who played for Malzahn at Springdale, says moving quickly between plays is crucial.

"With the no-huddle, obviously you've got to think quick on your feet. That's probably the hardest thing, just getting ready with that pace," he said. "Once you get it down, you pretty much know it. Once you get going, it clicks real quick."

Norman is part of a quartet of Arkansas freshmen who starred at Springdale last year. Quarterback Mitch Mustain, receiver Damian Williams and tight end Ben Cleveland also played for the Bulldogs under Malzahn.

That could ease their transition to the Razorbacks, but Malzahn knows this is a new level.

"I think there's some things that they are very familiar with that could give them an advantage, but at the same time, you've got to prove it on the field, and they understand that," Malzahn said. "This is different. This is different than high school."

The Springdale freshmen aren't the only ones having to adjust, of course. No offense can work without good blocking, and although Arkansas' offensive line lost only one starter from 2005, the transition to Malzahn's offense has been physically demanding.

"No-huddle is designed to tire the defense out," center Jonathan Luigs said. "You get their defensive coordinator working at a faster speed than they're used to."

That won't work if the offense tires first, so the linemen did extra conditioning work in the offseason. Now, Arkansas needs to decide who will throw behind them. Mustain, one of the nation's most sought-after recruits, will compete with Casey Dick and Robert Johnson for the starting job at quarterback.

Coaches are clearly antsy to settle on a starter at that position. Head coach Houston Nutt said he hopes to name one in the next 1½ weeks.

"I think there's a lot of different variables that go into that," Malzahn said. "Until you get in pads and get in scrimmage situations, it's hard to really have all the answers."

Although Malzahn's teams have produced gaudy passing statistics in the past, he's promised not to ignore the running game. McFadden rushed for 1,113 yards and fellow freshman Felix Jones added 626 last season.

Even after McFadden's injury, the Razorbacks still have tremendous depth at running back. In addition to Jones, they also have Peyton Hillis, a threat on the ground and as a receiver. Hillis led the team with 38 catches in 2005 -- and he's optimistic about Malzahn's arrival.

"What makes you really feel comfortable about it is that he's so confident about it," Hillis said. "That's what kind of guy we need. We need a guy with confidence."

Arkansas' use of the No-Huddle could actually benefit Auburn. Their might be players that do not want to run a No-Huddle that end up going to another school instead of :arky: . Maybe :au: we benefit by opicking up a player or two?

Link to comment
Share on other sites





Very interesting....

:au::homer:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love the no huddle and it can be very effective if you know what you are doing. Look at Georgia - they just ran up the field against us last year when they ran it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I think a lot of our trouble late last year was Gibbs on some level. I am sure CTT took over for Gibbs during the IB-06. He let Gibbs run the second half and gave away the late TD.

The no-Huddle is in reality a gimmick. If it was that effective Buffalo would have Super Bowl ring after Super Bowl ring. BTW, they dont. It is like the Wishbone, the novelty will get you so far just because some teams with lesser staffs wont be able to stop it. Remember this though, Bear and the Fabled Bama Wishbone never won a bowl game.

Besides, the No-Huddle may not be what you want on your resume when you go Pro. You have to limit the formations, etc. You cant use all your players because you are limited as to the rotation possibilities. On the flip side your D will be on the field even more times as well. Your three and outs dont run any real time off the clock. We also have the clock running changes this year too. That could really mess this up.

It might end up where we all have to go to some No-Huddle Offense features with the new clock rules.

All I am saying is there are certain pluses but also certain drawbacks to a No-Huddle. IF you cant run it well, it will show up very soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The no-Huddle is in reality a gimmick. If it was that effective Buffalo would have Super Bowl ring after Super Bowl ring. BTW, they dont.

:angry: DKW, you just had remind me of that glaring truth, I watched super bowl after super bowl. I will have to disagree on the no huddle, it can and does work, proof is in 4 straight AFC Championships (91-94), 4 straight Super Bowl Appearances (91-94), 8 consecutive AFC East Titles (88-95) by the Bills in the no huddle time period. It also produced, 5 of the top 6 units in all time offensive production, which isn't to shabby for a team which was AFL Champions twice (64 - 65), with 2 NFL & 1 AFL MVP's. Anyhow it can and does work with the right personnel and tireless persistence to make it work, oh and time, more time and a little more time. Not something college coaches have the luxury of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love the no huddle! If nothing else it's fun to watch, Arkansas O has been so boring over the past couple of years and not productive at all. Nutt is doing everything he can to save his job, it is a gimmick O but 3 yards and a cloud of dust doesn't work anymore! The bill's would have won 1 maybe 2 super Bowls if Scott Norwood have of kicked the ball at all! :big:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The no-Huddle is in reality a gimmick. If it was that effective Buffalo would have Super Bowl ring after Super Bowl ring. BTW, they dont.

Anyhow it can and does work with the right personnel and tireless persistence to make it work, oh and time, more time and a little more time. Not something college coaches have the luxury of.

You and I agree. I like the Bills. I thought it was exciting to watch. I also see that Lombardi, Landry, Parcells, Shula, etc. Won big and did not use it.

And your comment about the time factor is THE crux. With 25-33% average turnover on Offense in the college game you will likely never actually see a full return on the investment. I love how Borges scripts the first 10-20 plays per half. You can make it work from time to time, two minute drills etc. I just see this O crashing and burning very soon if it doesnt get off to a very quick start. I would use a no-hiddle if I was going up against a team that was seriously better talented than mine was. You can camouflage a lack of talent by better prep and coaching. In the fourth quarter though, I am sorry, you still have to have fresh players to make the plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...