Tigermike 4,296 Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 I finally took a look at the entire list at both Rivals & Scout. Below is the list from Scout and a link to the Rivals bottom of the rankings. If you are interested. Team rankings – the bottom of the list.101. New Mexico 10 MWC 102. Miami (Oh) 18 MAC 103. North Texas 15 Sun Belt 104. Nevada 7 WAC 105. Wyoming 12 MWC 105. 106. Ohio 8 MAC 106. 107. Air Force 12 MWC 108. Marshall 13 Conf USA 109. UTEP 11 Conf USA 109. 110. Colorado State 14 MWC 110. t111. Arkansas State 12 Sun Belt t111. UAB 14 Conf USA 113. Louisiana 17 Sun Belt 114. Akron 16 MAC 115. San Jose State 5 WAC 116. Toledo 18 MAC 117. Florida Atlantic 10 Sun Belt 118. New Mexico State 18 WAC 119. Eastern Michigan 9 MAC 120. Buffalo 7 MAC http://auburn.scout.com/a.z?s=6&p=9&c=14&yr=2009 Rivals http://auburn.rivals.com/teamrank.asp?Year...pe=0&Sort=0 Link to comment https://www.aufamily.com/topic/55987-recruiting-rankings/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
abrnfanatc 6 Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 So, does this mean that the 2009 group pf recruits is racist? Link to comment https://www.aufamily.com/topic/55987-recruiting-rankings/#findComment-578929 Share on other sites More sharing options...
BARNER 3 Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 I think it means the high on Wednesday will be 14 Link to comment https://www.aufamily.com/topic/55987-recruiting-rankings/#findComment-578966 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tigermike 4,296 Posted February 2, 2009 Author Share Posted February 2, 2009 Actually I was a little surprised at # 120. I would have to conclude that if T.G. signs the lowest ranked class in college football then based on this past years results, he coaches them up. And this in no way indicates I think he should have been hired instead of Coach Chizik. Link to comment https://www.aufamily.com/topic/55987-recruiting-rankings/#findComment-578968 Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldNewby 27 Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 Water skiing on Lakes Erie & Ontario is limited when frozen (unless you have an icebreaker handy). Link to comment https://www.aufamily.com/topic/55987-recruiting-rankings/#findComment-578969 Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthLink02 8 Posted February 3, 2009 Share Posted February 3, 2009 I finally took a look at the entire list at both Rivals & Scout. Below is the list from Scout and a link to the Rivals bottom of the rankings. If you are interested. Team rankings – the bottom of the list.101. New Mexico 10 MWC 102. Miami (Oh) 18 MAC 103. North Texas 15 Sun Belt 104. Nevada 7 WAC 105. Wyoming 12 MWC 105. 106. Ohio 8 MAC 106. 107. Air Force 12 MWC 108. Marshall 13 Conf USA 109. UTEP 11 Conf USA 109. 110. Colorado State 14 MWC 110. t111. Arkansas State 12 Sun Belt t111. UAB 14 Conf USA 113. Louisiana 17 Sun Belt 114. Akron 16 MAC 115. San Jose State 5 WAC 116. Toledo 18 MAC 117. Florida Atlantic 10 Sun Belt 118. New Mexico State 18 WAC 119. Eastern Michigan 9 MAC 120. Buffalo 7 MAC http://auburn.scout.com/a.z?s=6&p=9&c=14&yr=2009 Rivals http://auburn.rivals.com/teamrank.asp?Year...pe=0&Sort=0 Link to comment https://www.aufamily.com/topic/55987-recruiting-rankings/#findComment-579053 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tigermike 4,296 Posted February 3, 2009 Author Share Posted February 3, 2009 I finally took a look at the entire list at both Rivals & Scout. Below is the list from Scout and a link to the Rivals bottom of the rankings. If you are interested. Team rankings – the bottom of the list.101. New Mexico 10 MWC 102. Miami (Oh) 18 MAC 103. North Texas 15 Sun Belt 104. Nevada 7 WAC 105. Wyoming 12 MWC 105. 106. Ohio 8 MAC 106. 107. Air Force 12 MWC 108. Marshall 13 Conf USA 109. UTEP 11 Conf USA 109. 110. Colorado State 14 MWC 110. t111. Arkansas State 12 Sun Belt t111. UAB 14 Conf USA 113. Louisiana 17 Sun Belt 114. Akron 16 MAC 115. San Jose State 5 WAC 116. Toledo 18 MAC 117. Florida Atlantic 10 Sun Belt 118. New Mexico State 18 WAC 119. Eastern Michigan 9 MAC 120. Buffalo 7 MAC http://auburn.scout.com/a.z?s=6&p=9&c=14&yr=2009 Rivals http://auburn.rivals.com/teamrank.asp?Year...pe=0&Sort=0 If that's the case Iam glad someone else made up the list and not me. Link to comment https://www.aufamily.com/topic/55987-recruiting-rankings/#findComment-579063 Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinCrimson 61 Posted February 3, 2009 Share Posted February 3, 2009 FAU's low ranking surprises me. Schnellenberger can't field a better class among the millions that live in south Florida? And they've had some decent teams, too... Link to comment https://www.aufamily.com/topic/55987-recruiting-rankings/#findComment-579142 Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUman43 5 Posted February 3, 2009 Share Posted February 3, 2009 I guess this puts to rest bammer's claim to have down years, particularly during the coaching changes. These rankings also fail to take into consideration one of the most important reasons for recruiting. That is to fill NEEDS. Yes, you'd want to fill your needs first and filling all of those is a first priority. This ranks above stars etc. and you might not be able to fill those all with the highest ranked players and still have a solid class. IMO, this is where player evaluation comes in. Tubs was good at that. Link to comment https://www.aufamily.com/topic/55987-recruiting-rankings/#findComment-579165 Share on other sites More sharing options...
aubiescottie 1 Posted February 3, 2009 Share Posted February 3, 2009 Its a shame UAB is so low, the UAT trustees have absolutely just destroyed that program. Link to comment https://www.aufamily.com/topic/55987-recruiting-rankings/#findComment-579195 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.